Workers won the union election by an extraordinary landslide, with 97% support and over 200 votes cast. This represents the 11th successful union election across the National Park Service in just twel...

The White House has joined the left-leaning social media site—and has been made thoroughly unwelcome.

The public was forced to navigate five separate comment processes across three federal agencies as the Department of the Interior launched a sweeping review of longstanding policies protecting millions of acres of America’s wildest public lands. The unprecedented review, which requested “information and recommendations” regarding unspecified “revisions”, drew significant backlash from over 100 conservation organizations across the country concerned that the administration is targeting decades-old safeguards for Wilderness, Wilderness Study Areas, and other wilderness-quality lands across the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), National Park Service and Fish, and Wildlife Service. (See National Sign-on Letter; Senate and House Letter) The review comes amid a much broader dismantling of the rules, policies, staffing, and public processes that have protected America’s public lands for decades. The Trump administration has already moved to rescind conservation safeguards, weaken public land planning and public participation, roll back protections governing motorized use, and dramatically expand oil, gas, mining, logging, and other industrial development. The wilderness policy review now puts another layer of those safeguards at risk. For generations, these wild places have supported hiking, hunting, fishing, camping, backpacking, wildlife watching, and other backcountry experiences. Weakening wilderness stewardship in the name of “access” creates a false choice between...