As AI begins to match or exceed human researchers at core scientific tasks, two questions become pressing: \emph{why} should humans keep doing science, and \emph{how} should they use AI when they do? ...

We revisit advantage estimation in Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) and observe that any token-level advantage admits a two-stage factorization: a \emph{sample-level baselining} step that converts scalar verifier rewards into a comparable sequence-level signal, and a \emph{token-level cred…

An activation steering edit should depend on the input exactly when the destination varies \emph{inside} the class a query requests, and that is measurable before any rule is fitted or applied. Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA) adds one fixed direction to every input, the difference of the clas…

Electroencephalography (EEG) measures brain activity through recording electrical potentials of the scalp. EEG recordings capture two distinct sets of characteristics in the signal: (1) \emph{Traits} -- information that remains relatively constant over the course of a recording session, such as sub…

Existing Graphical User Interface (GUI) benchmarks predominantly rely on precise and stateless user instructions. In everyday usage, however, instructions are often \emph{vague and history-dependent}: users omit the exact details of their past operations because they no longer remember them, leavin…

Electroencephalography (EEG) measures brain activity through recording electrical potentials of the scalp. EEG recordings capture two distinct sets of characteristics in the signal: (1) \emph{Traits} -- information that remains relatively constant over the course of a recording session, such as sub…

Membership inference determines whether a candidate example was used to train a text-to-image diffusion model and is an important tool for auditing training-data use. We identify a directional membership signal in \emph{conditional prediction shifts}, the changes in predicted noise under alternativ…

Membership inference determines whether a candidate example was used to train a text-to-image diffusion model and is an important tool for auditing training-data use. We identify a directional membership signal in \emph{conditional prediction shifts}, the changes in predicted noise under alternativ…

The first modern revival of the BBC ghost stories for Christmas strand and it's a corker. Working with a limited budget, the director and writer create a convincing homage to the 1970s films that emph...

We revisit advantage estimation in Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) and observe that any token-level advantage admits a two-stage factorization: a \emph{sample-level baselining} step that converts scalar verifier rewards into a comparable sequence-level signal, and a \emph{token-level cred…

Existing Graphical User Interface (GUI) benchmarks predominantly rely on precise and stateless user instructions. In everyday usage, however, instructions are often \emph{vague and history-dependent}: users omit the exact details of their past operations because they no longer remember them, leavin…

Generative recommendation can reproduce a wider beam's ranked output with roughly half the prefix-capacity budget by reallocating retention capacity across semantic-ID positions. We identify a \emph{f...

As AI begins to match or exceed human researchers at core scientific tasks, two questions become pressing: \emph{why} should humans keep doing science, and \emph{how} should they use AI when they do? This paper argues that the second can be answered only by answering the first. It holds that one in…

Whether models trained on different modalities converge to the same representation of the world is central to AI. The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (PRH) conjectures that they do as they scale, but without a proof it offers neither a guarantee nor a recipe. We turn the hypothesis into a theorem. First, we prove a \emph{Platonic Representation Theorem}: Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) trained separately on any number of modalities learn the same representation up to one rotation whenever their positive pairs are two observations of one scene--\emph{good views}--and their misalignment is bounded otherwise. Second, we show that next-token prediction is a JEPA with \emph{bad views}, parts of a single document, which explains why language models align with vision only through scale. Third, we validate the theory from 145k captions to the texts of 940M web images, and uncover a scaling law of alignment that predicts unseen runs within seed noise. Good views need 42 times fewer training samples than next-token prediction on the same corpus to reach the same alignment, and a 109M-parameter text JEPA aligns with DINOv2 and CLIP's image encoders better than every language model we evaluated, up to 72B parameters, and than CLIP's text encoder: next-token prediction is a remarkably inefficient route to platonic representations. As a showcase, one rotation turns separately trained encoders into an image captioner (CIDEr .838 on COCO). Even that rotation needs no pair: on the latest pair-free benchmark, our text JEPA beats every zero-shot accuracy reported with language models up to 8B parameters, e.g., 64\% against at most 56\% top-5 on ImageNet-100. Positive views, and not scale alone, are thus the lever to build platonic representations.

Shares of Amazon.com Inc., Microsoft Corp., Alphabet Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc. closed higher today following Democrats’ resounding midterm victory. Amazon jumped 8.3% at one point and ended the trading session 6.1% higher than Tuesday. Microsoft gained nearly 6.7% while Alphabet and Google rose by about 3.1% and 1.4%, respectively. Multiple industry analysts tied the stock gains to the companies’ artificial intelligence buildout. Democrats won both chambers of Congress on a campaign that emphasized data center restrictions. Furthermore, voters approved 40 ballot measures focused on blocking or limiting AI infrastructure projects. Bloomberg cited Robert Pavlik, a senior portfolio manager at Dakota Wealth Management, as saying that tech giants’ shares jumped because investors believe a data center slowdown could improve their finances. Amazon, Meta and Google have become cash-flow-negative in recent months because of their steep infrastructure investments. Last Wednesday, the search giant reported a negative cash flow that exceeded the consensus estimate by about $6.4 billion. Google’s stock price plummeted 10% in after-hours trading even though its cloud revenue more than doubled. Needham & Co., B. ‌Riley ⁠Wealth and prominent tech industry analyst Ben Thompson highlighted another possible contributor to the stock rally. New restrictions on AI projects would make...

As AI begins to match or exceed human researchers at core scientific tasks, two questions become pressing: \emph{why} should humans keep doing science, and \emph{how} should they use AI when they do? This paper argues that the second can be answered only by answering the first. It holds that one in…

United Arab List chairman accuses Netanyahu of incitement over foreign interference claims United Arab List (UAL) chairman Mansour Abbas has hit back at Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's claims about foreign interference in the elections, accusing him of waging an incitement and deligitimisation camapaign against Israel's Palestinian citizens. In a statement, Abbas welcomed Central Elections Committee chairman Justice Noam Sohlberg's decision to investigate the claims, but emphasised that "UAL has no connection whatsoever to this affair or any other, and we declare that we will fully cooperate with all law enforcement authorities to establish the truth". He said that Netanyahu was the one "whose office employs Qatari agents". Sources familiar with the allegations told Haaretz that they are being blown "far out of proportion".

Whether models trained on different modalities converge to the same representation of the world is central to AI. The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (PRH) conjectures that they do as they scale, but without a proof it offers neither a guarantee nor a recipe. We turn the hypothesis into a theorem. First, we prove a \emph{Platonic Representation Theorem}: Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) trained separately on any number of modalities learn the same representation up to one rotation whenever their positive pairs are two observations of one scene--\emph{good views}--and their misalignment is bounded otherwise. Second, we show that next-token prediction is a JEPA with \emph{bad views}, parts of a single document, which explains why language models align with vision only through scale. Third, we validate the theory from 145k captions to the texts of 940M web images, and uncover a scaling law of alignment that predicts unseen runs within seed noise. Good views need 42 times fewer training samples than next-token prediction on the same corpus to reach the same alignment, and a 109M-parameter text JEPA aligns with DINOv2 and CLIP's image encoders better than every language model we evaluated, up to 72B parameters, and than CLIP's text encoder: next-token prediction is a remarkably inefficient route to platonic representations. As a showcase, one rotation turns separately trained encoders into an image captioner (CIDEr .838 on COCO). Even that rotation needs no pair: on the latest pair-free benchmark, our text JEPA beats every zero-shot accuracy reported with language models up to 8B parameters, e.g., 64\% against at most 56\% top-5 on ImageNet-100. Positive views, and not scale alone, are thus the lever to build platonic representations.

Whether models trained on different modalities converge to the same representation of the world is central to AI. The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (PRH) conjectures that they do as they scale, but without a proof it offers neither a guarantee nor a recipe. We turn the hypothesis into a theorem. First, we prove a \emph{Platonic Representation Theorem}: Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) trained separately on any number of modalities learn the same representation up to one rotation whenever their positive pairs are two observations of one scene--\emph{good views}--and their misalignment is bounded otherwise. Second, we show that next-token prediction is a JEPA with \emph{bad views}, parts of a single document, which explains why language models align with vision only through scale. Third, we validate the theory from 145k captions to the texts of 940M web images, and uncover a scaling law of alignment that predicts unseen runs within seed noise. Good views need 42 times fewer training samples than next-token prediction on the same corpus to reach the same alignment, and a 109M-parameter text JEPA aligns with DINOv2 and CLIP's image encoders better than every language model we evaluated, up to 72B parameters, and than CLIP's text encoder: next-token prediction is a remarkably inefficient route to platonic representations. As a showcase, one rotation turns separately trained encoders into an image captioner (CIDEr .838 on COCO). Even that rotation needs no pair: on the latest pair-free benchmark, our text JEPA beats every zero-shot accuracy reported with language models up to 8B parameters, e.g., 64\% against at most 56\% top-5 on ImageNet-100. Positive views, and not scale alone, are thus the lever to build platonic representations.

While multimodal contrastive models like CLIP and CLAP successfully learn shared representations, their embeddings typically exhibit a persistent \emph{modality gap}. We propose addressing this separation through a purely geometric approach: changing the embedding domain from the unit sphere, $S^{d…

Whether models trained on different modalities converge to the same representation of the world is central to AI. The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (PRH) conjectures that they do as they scale, but without a proof it offers neither a guarantee nor a recipe. We turn the hypothesis into a theorem. First, we prove a \emph{Platonic Representation Theorem}: Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) trained separately on any number of modalities learn the same representation up to one rotation whenever their positive pairs are two observations of one scene--\emph{good views}--and their misalignment is bounded otherwise. Second, we show that next-token prediction is a JEPA with \emph{bad views}, parts of a single document, which explains why language models align with vision only through scale. Third, we validate the theory from 145k captions to the texts of 940M web images, and uncover a scaling law of alignment that predicts unseen runs within seed noise. Good views need 42 times fewer training samples than next-token prediction on the same corpus to reach the same alignment, and a 109M-parameter text JEPA aligns with DINOv2 and CLIP's image encoders better than every language model we evaluated, up to 72B parameters, and than CLIP's text encoder: next-token prediction is a remarkably inefficient route to platonic representations. As a showcase, one rotation turns separately trained encoders into an image captioner (CIDEr .838 on COCO). Even that rotation needs no pair: on the latest pair-free benchmark, our text JEPA beats every zero-shot accuracy reported with language models up to 8B parameters, e.g., 64\% against at most 56\% top-5 on ImageNet-100. Positive views, and not scale alone, are thus the lever to build platonic representations.

Recent \emph{test-time training} (TTT) frameworks have enabled open-weight large language models (LLMs) to outperform inference-only frameworks powered by frontier models on scientific discovery tasks. However, TTT introduces additional computational cost for online weight updates during the discov…