#Editorialists
good thing is that even students who attend elitists schools are showing support for the movement & progressive policies, which fucking break the brains of the editorialists from the various tv channels owned by billionnaires
October 9, 2026 at 1:32 PM
Don't worry, the only ones getting excited or faking it are the editorialists of the ROC. No Canadian politician reacted because they can read the numbers. 28% + a minority gov. is a new Canadian low. The average lifetime is 18 months or less. Both PSPP & Carney want to collaborate & need to.
October 8, 2026 at 2:58 PM
Because they're reporters, not editorialists, and if they DID do that, people would scream they were putting their thumb on the scale.
October 5, 2026 at 12:57 PM
I mean where do you get editorialists stupider than the people you interview in MAGA diners, NYT, it should be impossible
October 5, 2026 at 12:37 AM
My deep appreciation to the pundits, editorialists, and politicos who keep us woke and aware.
Also my deep appreciation to all of those that don't, for keeping us sane. You really can't have too much art, for animal pictures and videos.
October 2, 2026 at 8:52 PM
You mean not according to the opinions of the Haaretz editorialists. It is leftist. It existence proves that Israel is a democracy. Did Gaza have an equivalent? Nope.
September 29, 2026 at 12:05 AM
Making lists now? Maybe the PM made the cardinal sin of not paying attention to the confused political antics of the Globe & Mail's editorialists?
September 29, 2026 at 3:38 AM
It’s an industry. And not just in the US. We have it here in Europe, too. About half of german-speaking regular editorialists only know how to write about woke and anti-woke. UK and France - the same. It’s a genre now, like food columns.
September 28, 2026 at 6:24 AM
Carbon Copy Editorials Against El-Sayed - fair.org/home/carbon-...
Carbon Copy Editorials Against El-Sayed
Editorialists at the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal might not like El-Sayed's ideas, but it is clear voters do.
fair.org
September 29, 2026 at 1:17 AM
Yeah just to be clear I was saying basically, “wow that’s how suspensions on this kind of case are supposed to work? that’s totally inconsistent with how I know them to actually work.” I fully agree with the editorialists and was pointing out that the process doesn’t match up.
September 27, 2026 at 5:00 PM
I disagree.
How else is the lie and liar exposed.
If they took your advice, WaPo would never have accounted for well over 30,000 lies he told in his first term.
Some of us, history included want the the full picture no matter how messy.
The editorialists can then do their job commenting on it.
September 27, 2026 at 4:10 AM
Their editorialists have been far far right and Trump's biggest journalistic promoters...until recently when even they seem to have drunk too much of his koolaide.
September 25, 2026 at 11:02 PM
I'm not sure how the Canadian media scolds can handle this new paradigm. Editorialists and pundits jump to the conclusion that Canada wants to join the EU but downplays the danger from the US annexing Canada. Do you have dysfunctional hyperbole syndrome?
September 23, 2026 at 1:23 PM
Puff puff pass, nytimes and wapo editorialists. I want what you're having.
September 19, 2026 at 9:36 PM
Great job bending the knee and ass kissing him, Bezos and all those ‘editorialists’ at the NYT…
POLITICO: “.. . A second person close to the White House said there’s already been discussions about adding more outlets to the ban. Trump himself on Friday cited The New York Times and The Washington Post as possible additions.”

@politico.com
www.politico.com/newsletters/...
September 19, 2026 at 6:51 PM
This is rather typical of NYTimes opinion editorialists, btw.

I think he is pointing out that wealthy concerns just see politics through the lens of their own money.
September 17, 2026 at 4:02 PM
I keep getting these annoying ads saying to vote "no" on CA Prop 40 because public workers are against it. But as far as I can tell, the breakdown appears to be more like:

No: Newsome, Tech and Business types, Newspaper editorialists

Yes: Unions, many Democrats, teachers, healthcare workers
September 15, 2026 at 3:53 PM
CNN is moving right, but the point would be to remove/lessen political leanings in news as much as possible.

There should just be the news and the entertainment editorialists can add their slants. But facts should be facts.

Make News Facts Again......lol
September 15, 2026 at 2:45 PM
The art of dealing with a sealion. Whenever a question includes "...what exactly..." I know I've found one and it's time to let the editorialists answer.
September 3, 2026 at 7:31 PM
This is absolutely because of how nobody ever takes crypto/AI shitheels seriously, nosy racist dipshit editorialists running away crying to Substack or whatever. It will never be applied to racist bad-faith types, it will never protect the actually-vulnerable.
Dogpiling or harassing users is unacceptable. We have taken recent action against accounts for this behavior, and we will be increasing our efforts, consistent with our Community Guidelines.
Community Guidelines - Bluesky
bsky.social
September 2, 2026 at 9:03 PM
the racism is also why only twenty newspaper editorialists are Black
August 30, 2026 at 1:58 PM
It's not so far from not seeing the nazi salute of a billionaire because in the mind of many editorialists, markets can't possibly grow a nazi. How could elections be influenced by racist ideologies then?
August 29, 2026 at 2:25 PM
the most cited authors are a mix of SEGM and its grantees as well as co-authors of the SOC8. many of these researchers (including the SOC8 authors) are well known in anti-trans media
August 27, 2026 at 3:21 PM
What is Canada supposed to do when the American government is run by a lunatic with a spineless political class surrounding him? Editorialists better get inline with the political reality they are too ideologically right or left from.
August 22, 2026 at 8:17 PM