Arguments focused on whether DCF records showing prior allegations or a purported recantation could be used for impeachment or Bohannon cross-examination; justices probed whether a recantation is required or whether third-party assessments can suffice.

The Washington Court of Appeals heard oral argument Sept. 14 over whether evidence was sufficient to convict Kathan Tenry as an accomplice in shootings tied to a multi-jurisdiction carjacking and chase; judges took the matter under advisement. Counsel disputed whether Tenry had the requisite knowledge or acted in a way that aided crimes before they were completed.

Jurors review evidence standards in aggravated assault trial in Bexar County Texas.

In an appeal raising multiple trial‑error claims, counsel argued a scowling juror, unredacted restraining‑order testimony and ambiguous text‑message evidence combined to prejudice the juvenile's trial; the Commonwealth defended the verdict and disputed the scope of the alleged errors.

Appellant Philip Palmer argued the evidence tying him to a shooting was insufficient and that Detective Molinaris testimony that a handgun appeared to be placed in the defendants waistband amounted to an improper lay opinion; the Commonwealth said shell casings and video timing support a reasonable inference and that limiting instructions cured any risk. The case was submitted.

Defense highlights absence of physical evidence linking defendant to gun or shooting.

Court reviews gunshot residue evidence and trial counsel effectiveness in defendant's appeal.

The 2025-2030 Dietary Guidelines have sparked unprecedented scientific controversy over evidence standards and me… #Dietaryguidelines #Evidencestandards #Nutritionpolicy #Publichealth #Scientificcontroversy

Judge examines lack of proof regarding Brasfield's primary residence status and GPS usage.

Court questions validity of evidence against Archie, citing lack of clear allegations and Fourth Amendment concerns.