#FunSearch
im doing a test with small task subset rn i wanna see the funsearch envs keep spiking
November 6, 2026 at 5:04 PM
finally got a hit on one of the funsearch tasks. it's been 1.677 days and 22 steps. 2b model. this is torture. a single positive hit in funsearch_dudeney_1917
November 10, 2026 at 8:54 PM
i added these funsearch-like environments that explicitly keep track of responses and rewards to feed in some @ random to every new rollout where the rwd is improvement over the highest performing parent idk if it's a good idea but we're gonna see!
November 5, 2026 at 11:32 PM
funsearch envs added to trainer:
- training an RNN on the pile, they design both the trainer and the optimizer
- golomb rulers
- no-three-in-line problem
November 5, 2026 at 11:34 PM
DeepMind’s FunSearch paired a large language model with an automated evaluator and improved on the best-known results for the cap set problem in mathematics. Published in Nature. Apparently the “hype machine” found time to contribute to mathematics while you were dismissing it.
October 30, 2026 at 9:44 PM
the original p = np + ai (/jokingly). i reference this a lot and folk dont remember. i recommend
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
October 28, 2026 at 7:31 PM
the original p = np + ai (/jokingly). i reference this a lot and folk dont remember. i recommend
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
October 28, 2026 at 7:31 PM
These 'AI cracks math research' headlines keep getting walked back once someone actually reruns the numbers. Same pattern as the Erdos-problem and FunSearch claims last year.
October 17, 2026 at 9:06 AM
재귀적 자기 개선(RSI, Recursive Self-Improvement) 기법에 대한 서베이 연구 (2/2): 검증 계층과 자동 연구, 안전 문제 등

핵심 요약

• Recursive Self-Improvement in AI 서베이는 개선 신호를 신뢰도에 따라 형식 검증기, 실행 피드백, 학습된 심판, 내재 신호의 네 단계 검증 계층으로 정렬하고, 실제로 입증된 자기 개선의 강도가 이 계층을 따른다고 관찰합니다(측정된 법칙이 아닌 정성적 패턴입니다).
• 자기 개선 루프의 실패 모드는 자기 확증 루프, 붕괴, 다양성 붕괴, …
재귀적 자기 개선(RSI, Recursive Self-Improvement) 기법에 대한 서베이 연구 (2/2): 검증 계층과 자동 연구, 안전 문제 등
핵심 요약 • Recursive Self-Improvement in AI 서베이는 개선 신호를 신뢰도에 따라 형식 검증기, 실행 피드백, 학습된 심판, 내재 신호의 네 단계 검증 계층으로 정렬하고, 실제로 입증된 자기 개선의 강도가 이 계층을 따른다고 관찰합니다(측정된 법칙이 아닌 정성적 패턴입니다). • 자기 개선 루프의 실패 모드는 자기 확증 루프, 붕괴, 다양성 붕괴, 프레임 고착의 네 가지이며, 이 중 프레임 고착은 루프가 추적하는 지표로는 감지할 수 없습니다. • 자동 연구(139편)에서는 자동 평가기가 있는 진화적 프로그램 발견(FunSearch, AlphaEvolve)이 AI 인프라로 되돌아가는 결과를 냈지만, AI 과학자 에이전트는 SciIntegrity-Bench에서 7개 모델 전반에 $34.2%$ 의 무결성 실패율을 보이는 등 검증이 생성을 따라가지 못하고...
discuss.pytorch.kr
October 6, 2026 at 9:01 AM
FunSearch demonstrated generate-and-test search in December 2023, reporting new mathematical constructions from generated programs and external evaluation. It was an existing capability, but a reason to doubt the inference that further progress was capped.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06924-6
September 8, 2026 at 8:15 AM
AlphaEvolve. train an agent to explore updates and iteratively improve a codebase on a well-defined task. its predecessor was "FunSearch"
AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery
In this white paper, we present AlphaEvolve, an evolutionary coding agent that substantially enhances capabilities of state-of-the-art LLMs on highly challenging tasks such as tackling open scientific...
arxiv.org
August 24, 2026 at 3:46 PM
Sketching out my next book, loosely inspired by the Siege of the International Legations
For funsearch I watched 55 Days at Peking and it's got the... Problems... Endemic to movies of the era, and the scale of production is wild. Thousands and thousands of extras and all of them get blown up
March 26, 2026 at 3:23 PM
Oh, interesting! I’ve opened but not read your paper. I was going to ask if you saw this as a variant of “genetic programing” but that phrase is not in your paper. You do mention FunSearch, which indeed talked about its connection to GP. Similar but with GP crossover replaced with LLM synthesis.
April 27, 2025 at 9:12 PM
e.g. deepmind's funsearch used an llm to find a previously unknown solution to the cap-set problem, improving a 20-year-old bound. the solution is mechanically verifiable and the previous record is published. you can check both yourself:

www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models - Nature
FunSearch makes discoveries in established open problems using large language models by searching for programs describing how to solve a problem, rather than what the solution is.
www.nature.com
August 10, 2026 at 9:38 AM
LLM-Guided Search for Deletion-Correcting Codes

Franziska Weindel, Reinhard Heckel

Action editor: Zhengzhang Chen

https://openreview.net/forum?id=qZ69Ozpo6v

#funsearch #deletions #constructions
July 12, 2026 at 4:20 AM
The Mini Sneaky Ninja is hidden somewhere in this scene 👀
It’s not as easy as it looks — think you can spot him?

#SneakyNinja #MiniNinja #PuzzleChallenge #HiddenGame #SeekAndSpot #FunSearch #BlueJays #Baseball #Game

youtube.com/shorts/pTGp4...
Let's Go Blue Jays! #SneakyNinja #challenge #puzzle #HiddenObject #Game #hideandseek #Ninja #findit
YouTube video by Spot The Sneaky Ninja
youtube.com
October 6, 2025 at 12:22 PM
August 1, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Interestingly there have been successful usages of LLMs in genetic algorithm like ways, i.e. FunSearch / AlphaEvolve.
August 1, 2025 at 1:27 PM
LLM-Guided Search for Deletion-Correcting Codes
Finding deletion-correcting codes of maximum size has been an open problem for over 70 years, even for a single deletion. We adapt FunSearch, a large language model (LLM)-guided evolutionary search, to discover functions that construct deletion-correcting codes at short code lengths. For a single deletion, our search finds a function that we prove constructs the conjectured-optimal Varshamov-Tenengolts code. For multiple deletions and quaternary edit codes, the discovered functions improve on prior explicit, search-based, and neural constructions but remain empirical heuristics without new theoretical insights. We study design choices for LLM-guided evolutionary search and find that, for our problem, compute is better allocated to sampling more functions than to longer reasoning traces per function, and that co-evolving natural language descriptions with code hurts search quality. We propose deduplicating logically identical functions during evolution, which we find critical for search diversity. Our results demonstrate the potential of LLM-guided evolutionary search for information theory and code design and represent the first application of such methods for constructing error-correcting codes. However, in our current formulation, evaluating a function scales exponentially with code length, limiting the approach to short codes.
arxiv.org
June 8, 2026 at 7:48 AM
LLM-Guided Search for Deletion-Correcting Codes
Finding deletion-correcting codes of maximum size has been an open problem for over 70 years, even for a single deletion. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for constructing deletion-correcting codes. A code is a set of sequences satisfying certain constraints, and we construct it by greedily adding the highest-priority sequence according to a priority function. To find good priority functions, we leverage FunSearch, a large language model (LLM)-guided evolutionary search proposed by Romera et al., 2024. FunSearch iteratively generates, evaluates, and refines priority functions to construct large deletion-correcting codes. For a single deletion, our evolutionary search finds functions that construct codes which match known maximum sizes, reach the size of the largest (conjectured optimal) Varshamov-Tenengolts codes where the maximum is unknown, and independently rediscover them in equivalent form. For two deletions, we find functions that construct codes with new best-known sizes for code lengths \\( n = 12, 13 \\), and \\( 16 \\), establishing improved lower bounds. These results demonstrate the potential of LLM-guided search for information theory and code design and represent the first application of such methods for constructing error-correcting codes.
arxiv.org
April 2, 2025 at 5:09 AM