sky i am suing you for IIED
September 19, 2026 at 10:06 PM
sky i am suing you for IIED
russia has kіIIed so many of our incredible people who could have chаnged the world for the better…
August 30, 2025 at 10:24 PM
russia has kіIIed so many of our incredible people who could have chаnged the world for the better…
I am once again threatening to sue my father, claiming IIED for making me a Phillies fan.
September 27, 2026 at 12:49 AM
I am once again threatening to sue my father, claiming IIED for making me a Phillies fan.
Putting this on my timeline is IIED
June 25, 2026 at 3:17 AM
Putting this on my timeline is IIED
I'm surprised they haven't been Biosphere IIed
December 27, 2025 at 1:45 AM
I'm surprised they haven't been Biosphere IIed
Hostile work environment? IIED? Trans people are actually, legally, not up for fuckin debate here.
November 24, 2025 at 11:44 PM
Hostile work environment? IIED? Trans people are actually, legally, not up for fuckin debate here.
IIED is not a crime as far as I know it is a tort (civil case)
June 6, 2024 at 7:53 PM
IIED is not a crime as far as I know it is a tort (civil case)
Also for
IIED
Intentional
Infliction of
Emotional
Distress
IIED
Intentional
Infliction of
Emotional
Distress
August 3, 2026 at 10:34 PM
Also for
IIED
Intentional
Infliction of
Emotional
Distress
IIED
Intentional
Infliction of
Emotional
Distress
this should be basis for an IIED claim idc
August 5, 2026 at 10:09 PM
this should be basis for an IIED claim idc
That's IIED.
the Nats did fireworks on their Bark in the Park night are you kidding
April 27, 2025 at 7:09 PM
That's IIED.
Sure it does. “IIED is a very tough claim to bring” is a description of an IIED claim.
January 8, 2026 at 4:23 PM
Sure it does. “IIED is a very tough claim to bring” is a description of an IIED claim.
Can I sue for IIED just for having read this?
So much for the “Nuzzi’s prose is bad because she used ChatGPT” hypothesis
November 18, 2025 at 2:04 AM
Can I sue for IIED just for having read this?
Should ban everyone in this thread for IIED
February 4, 2026 at 8:51 PM
Should ban everyone in this thread for IIED
Translation: I Iied.
Mike Johnson on Friday: Trump was an FBI informant against Jeffrey Epstein.
Mike Johnson yesterday: "I don't know if I used the right terminology."
Mike Johnson yesterday: "I don't know if I used the right terminology."
September 9, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Translation: I Iied.
Now, I am not a First Amendment expert. But I'm pretty sure those posts don't constitute defamation per se, IIED, false light, doxxing, misappropriation, or unjust enrichment. I hope all the women of Chicago know about him now, though.
January 11, 2024 at 8:56 PM
Now, I am not a First Amendment expert. But I'm pretty sure those posts don't constitute defamation per se, IIED, false light, doxxing, misappropriation, or unjust enrichment. I hope all the women of Chicago know about him now, though.
We love a per se standard for IIED for that conduct don't we folks.
June 21, 2026 at 5:40 PM
We love a per se standard for IIED for that conduct don't we folks.
I Iied, we aren't going to have sex
We're going to lay on the floor fully clothed and hold hands
We're going to lay on the floor fully clothed and hold hands
February 18, 2025 at 6:46 AM
I Iied, we aren't going to have sex
We're going to lay on the floor fully clothed and hold hands
We're going to lay on the floor fully clothed and hold hands
Legal fees? I'm thinking IIED tort suit for a gazillion dollars. Let them defend that.
June 17, 2026 at 4:20 AM
Legal fees? I'm thinking IIED tort suit for a gazillion dollars. Let them defend that.
I'm suing you for IIED for putting this on my timeline...
May 4, 2025 at 1:43 AM
I'm suing you for IIED for putting this on my timeline...
"I thought you were going to bed" it's not that Iied it's that I failed
August 6, 2025 at 4:39 AM
"I thought you were going to bed" it's not that Iied it's that I failed
I think there is a very viable argument that the posts are Twitter's, and that §230 does not apply.
I also think that it's possible someone might be able to state a claim (IIED and/or NIED, if available) that would stick.
Copyright probably won't, despite the derivative work issue, due to license.
I also think that it's possible someone might be able to state a claim (IIED and/or NIED, if available) that would stick.
Copyright probably won't, despite the derivative work issue, due to license.
the state of Twitter: you can reply to any image of a woman with a request to Grok to undress her to her underwear and it will comply and post the reply in thread: www.404media.co/elon-musks-g...
Elon Musk's Grok AI Will 'Remove Her Clothes' In Public, On X
Elon Musk’s AI bot is undressing women on X.
www.404media.co
May 6, 2025 at 10:36 PM
I think there is a very viable argument that the posts are Twitter's, and that §230 does not apply.
I also think that it's possible someone might be able to state a claim (IIED and/or NIED, if available) that would stick.
Copyright probably won't, despite the derivative work issue, due to license.
I also think that it's possible someone might be able to state a claim (IIED and/or NIED, if available) that would stick.
Copyright probably won't, despite the derivative work issue, due to license.
In 10/23, the court granted SJ on $965 million debt in compensatory damages (defamation and IIED), and $150 million in CUTPA (punitives). Excepting these amounts from discharge.
November 25, 2024 at 8:42 PM
In 10/23, the court granted SJ on $965 million debt in compensatory damages (defamation and IIED), and $150 million in CUTPA (punitives). Excepting these amounts from discharge.
I was looking at a different tort than IIED; IIED would still apply to untreated patients.
September 16, 2024 at 12:26 AM
I was looking at a different tort than IIED; IIED would still apply to untreated patients.
The radio just called no doubt's Don't speak classic rock and that's IIED and RICO.
June 11, 2025 at 12:23 PM
The radio just called no doubt's Don't speak classic rock and that's IIED and RICO.
The first "I" in IIED would be a big big FTCA problem.
January 13, 2026 at 4:46 AM
The first "I" in IIED would be a big big FTCA problem.