#JCIDS
lmfao

JCIDS: not entirely bullshit, actually
Wow, so I guess all those traditional T&E processes weren't complete bullshit huh? Who would have thought?
September 27, 2025 at 1:48 PM
Should note that this the old way because JCIDS is gone and CAPE is sidelined while the JROC isn’t doing component level reviews and the RRAB is kinda doing what JCIDS did
March 11, 2026 at 2:41 PM
RIP JCIDS you were too pure
March 4, 2026 at 5:16 PM
He now chairs the CAPE/JCIDS replacement board

media.defense.gov/2025/Nov/10/...
media.defense.gov
April 22, 2026 at 11:45 PM
It didn't go through JCIDS and JROC, it was established on a SecDef's memo referencing a partially rescinded Obama EO. There was no capability based assessment done to see who had what, who did what, who needed what, who owned what regarding CHMR. 14/
July 7, 2026 at 3:16 PM
JCIDS though...
January 15, 2025 at 1:35 AM
Who called it JCIDS reform to emphasize commercial off-the-shelf acquisition instead of Defense Industrial Bass Pro Shops?
December 12, 2025 at 1:14 PM
There's a reason the DAF has multiple career fields while entire job is understanding and executing the DAS, PPBE, and the JFRP (formerly JCIDS)
May 7, 2026 at 5:33 PM
Oh, Russ, bless your heart. You're not ready for the confluence of PPBE and JCIDS.
April 6, 2025 at 12:22 AM
put the gundam suit through JCIDS
Like you want to argue against stereotypes but in my first month as a liaison at a regional HQ, a counterpart showed me a JSDF study written on the feasibility of Gundam suits and there was no hint that it was a parody study.
March 15, 2026 at 9:05 PM
In a nutshell, this is why this is stupid: Units who would experiment w/ things don't have time to do that & work on current readiness. You need a futures enterprise to develop the long-range concepts & capabilities. Not everything is needed now. Bottom<

www.airandspaceforces.com/new-report-a...
New Report: Abolish JCIDS, Replace with Bottom-Up Approach
A new paper argues the Pentagon should abandon its requirements-setting process JCIDS and focus on one relying on experimentation.
www.airandspaceforces.com
February 16, 2025 at 2:19 AM
I really only came up with this to say "Space DFAS." You think they have Space JCIDS?
Ooooh I have a fun headcanon of how knowledge of the Death Star leaves the incredibly small circle that's probably just the Emperor, Tarkin, Vader, Krennic, and Erso
i can't find it now but there's a classic star wars fanfic that's like an exasperated report from an imperial accountant about the mounting costs of the death star project, definitely the ANDOR writers room has read that, right?
April 25, 2025 at 8:53 PM
jcids quest
May 9, 2026 at 8:49 PM
Looks like the new Secretary of the “Department of War” has been busy. Hegseth Cuts JCIDS in Move to Speed Weapons Development.

www.airandspaceforces.com/pentagon-lea...
Hegseth Cuts JCIDS in Move to Speed Weapons Development
The Pentagon is dismantling JCIDS, looking to dramatically speed up the process for setting requirements for new weapons systems.
www.airandspaceforces.com
August 31, 2025 at 5:30 PM
The biggest issue was, as I've written here several times, what happened to the CHMR project was obvious to anyone who knew anything about the HTS experiment. Additionally, being established outside of the JCIDs/JROC process made CHMR especially vulnerable. 33/
August 27, 2026 at 12:49 AM
"Please explain the Department of Defense acquisition process, highlighting the role JCIDS, DAS, and PPBE play in ensuring each service branch meets their Title 10 responsibilities?"
January 15, 2025 at 12:53 AM
Hegseth is announcing that he's killing JCIDS today as if it's a big move, but that was announced back in August. breakingdefense.com/2025/08/pent...
Pentagon terminating JCIDS process as part of larger acquisition reform: Memo   - Breaking Defense
“So, the way I read the memo is great, we can go a lot faster now but the big question that remains is, ‘Are we moving faster in the right direction?’” a service official said.
breakingdefense.com
November 7, 2025 at 7:37 PM
FY27 Budget Submission of $1.5T any day now, I'm sure Budgets Steve is working the PPBE like a charm now that CAPE is kneecapped and JCIDS is gone
February 24, 2026 at 8:47 PM
A new Hudson Institute report argues JCIDS has failed to produce promised results and is beyond salvaging.
‘Burn it down’: Experts urge ditching sluggish Pentagon arms process
A new Hudson Institute report argues JCIDS has failed to produce promised results and is beyond salvaging.
www.defensenews.com
February 10, 2025 at 9:53 PM
who has good links to some of the recent changes at DoD the last couple weeks? end of JCIDS and JROC, increased authorities for DSD?
September 1, 2025 at 3:16 PM
The program was never going to last. It was established & built outside the normal processes w/in DOD (JCIDS & JROC), Congress created unfunded mandates, it was one SecDef's baby, & no one in the program's leadership had a clue how civil service hiring worked or how to fix it. 18/
July 8, 2026 at 3:29 PM
No all of these PPBE/JCIDS processes need to be taken out back of the Pentagon and shot. Their replacement probably won’t be any better but step one is finally exorcising Robert McNamara’s Ghost out of the Pentagon.
November 8, 2025 at 3:02 AM
>a dedicated human to practice. Process doesn't begin to compensate for the need to have a person who moves in and out of this world in the same way we treat other career fields deemed path specific because of a particular domain knowledge. JCIDS failed in part because we didn't train people to it.
May 7, 2026 at 5:13 PM
They didn't do a capabilities based assessment to see who was doing what, who had what, who needed what. They didn't write a policy & a strategy, they didn't go through JCIDS & JROC, they just wrote an action plan based on the SecDef memo & the NDAA. Then they wrote a DOD Instruction. 9/
March 13, 2026 at 1:20 AM