Gcc has llm generated code, heh.
November 10, 2026 at 3:04 PM
Gcc has llm generated code, heh.
americans when thinking about LLM-generated vs. human-written code: "imagine burger"
November 10, 2026 at 8:48 AM
americans when thinking about LLM-generated vs. human-written code: "imagine burger"
Like.. if you use an Apache library, you're using LLM generated code at some point in the chain.
If you use GCC, you're using LLM generated code.
If you use LInux, you're using LLM generated code.
If you use unity...
If you use...
Yeah.
If you use GCC, you're using LLM generated code.
If you use LInux, you're using LLM generated code.
If you use unity...
If you use...
Yeah.
November 10, 2026 at 2:02 PM
Like.. if you use an Apache library, you're using LLM generated code at some point in the chain.
If you use GCC, you're using LLM generated code.
If you use LInux, you're using LLM generated code.
If you use unity...
If you use...
Yeah.
If you use GCC, you're using LLM generated code.
If you use LInux, you're using LLM generated code.
If you use unity...
If you use...
Yeah.
That account is almost certainly a bot. The pfp is AI generated and everything they post looks like the output of an LLM
November 10, 2026 at 4:06 AM
That account is almost certainly a bot. The pfp is AI generated and everything they post looks like the output of an LLM
It's genuinely bizarre to hear ARC Raiders being used as an example of "small, often imperceptible, amount of LLM generated content".
Most of the games voice clips are AI-generated. That's not small.
Most of the games voice clips are AI-generated. That's not small.
November 10, 2026 at 6:09 PM
It's genuinely bizarre to hear ARC Raiders being used as an example of "small, often imperceptible, amount of LLM generated content".
Most of the games voice clips are AI-generated. That's not small.
Most of the games voice clips are AI-generated. That's not small.
been thinking about the "lack of beauty" described in some recent LLM-generated proofs & wondering how much of this is simply in the eye of the beholder
November 10, 2026 at 6:29 PM
been thinking about the "lack of beauty" described in some recent LLM-generated proofs & wondering how much of this is simply in the eye of the beholder
Same w CNBC. The more news organizations use Kalshi as a "reference", gives them legitimacy.
It's like LLM generated summaries or bullet points news orgs have added under partnership w LLM vendors.
Same w online gambling w sporting events.
🤮
It's like LLM generated summaries or bullet points news orgs have added under partnership w LLM vendors.
Same w online gambling w sporting events.
🤮
November 9, 2026 at 8:05 PM
Same w CNBC. The more news organizations use Kalshi as a "reference", gives them legitimacy.
It's like LLM generated summaries or bullet points news orgs have added under partnership w LLM vendors.
Same w online gambling w sporting events.
🤮
It's like LLM generated summaries or bullet points news orgs have added under partnership w LLM vendors.
Same w online gambling w sporting events.
🤮
"AI" here is unrelated to LLM and nowadays "generative" models. It's either good old ML (actually statistically generated recognition polynomial function) or an image recognition neural network. They were in use decades before LLM
November 10, 2026 at 11:38 AM
"AI" here is unrelated to LLM and nowadays "generative" models. It's either good old ML (actually statistically generated recognition polynomial function) or an image recognition neural network. They were in use decades before LLM
If people dislike the game for having LLM generated code, there is nothing wrong with that. I personally hate it myself.
I just think invalidating the humanity of the game otherwise is wrong. What people think of LLM usage is a wholey different manner.
I just think invalidating the humanity of the game otherwise is wrong. What people think of LLM usage is a wholey different manner.
November 10, 2026 at 4:12 PM
If people dislike the game for having LLM generated code, there is nothing wrong with that. I personally hate it myself.
I just think invalidating the humanity of the game otherwise is wrong. What people think of LLM usage is a wholey different manner.
I just think invalidating the humanity of the game otherwise is wrong. What people think of LLM usage is a wholey different manner.
Does that matter if you are having LLMs write all the code? Maybe this is part of why reading LLM-generated PRs sucks so much...
November 10, 2026 at 12:50 AM
Does that matter if you are having LLMs write all the code? Maybe this is part of why reading LLM-generated PRs sucks so much...
Big Walk is my game of the year, without contention
It being excluded from selection as game of the year based off LLM usage is a wholly valid position
Putting the studio/game in the same camp as wholly generated titles from obvious grifters is disingenuous
It being excluded from selection as game of the year based off LLM usage is a wholly valid position
Putting the studio/game in the same camp as wholly generated titles from obvious grifters is disingenuous
November 10, 2026 at 7:04 PM
Big Walk is my game of the year, without contention
It being excluded from selection as game of the year based off LLM usage is a wholly valid position
Putting the studio/game in the same camp as wholly generated titles from obvious grifters is disingenuous
It being excluded from selection as game of the year based off LLM usage is a wholly valid position
Putting the studio/game in the same camp as wholly generated titles from obvious grifters is disingenuous
And it was so jarring, because I've read tens of thousands of scientific posters & there's a very specific structure & voicing I'm used to.
My greatest fear isn't that the LLM will get better. It's that we'll just accept that everything is 'slopshaped' now & will stop seeing it for what it is.
My greatest fear isn't that the LLM will get better. It's that we'll just accept that everything is 'slopshaped' now & will stop seeing it for what it is.
SlopShape: Identifying AI-Generated Commercial Web Content
arxiv.org
November 9, 2026 at 5:50 PM
And it was so jarring, because I've read tens of thousands of scientific posters & there's a very specific structure & voicing I'm used to.
My greatest fear isn't that the LLM will get better. It's that we'll just accept that everything is 'slopshaped' now & will stop seeing it for what it is.
My greatest fear isn't that the LLM will get better. It's that we'll just accept that everything is 'slopshaped' now & will stop seeing it for what it is.
Not great that the overwhelming subject of lobsters’ discussion on *sshole is the LLM generated website and not the vulnerability or software practices that led to it
November 6, 2026 at 10:51 AM
Not great that the overwhelming subject of lobsters’ discussion on *sshole is the LLM generated website and not the vulnerability or software practices that led to it
Given that Unity has had LLM generated code in it since at least 2023, are the group of IGF jurors declining to vote for Big Walk also going to decline to vote for all Unity games going forward?
November 10, 2026 at 7:36 PM
Given that Unity has had LLM generated code in it since at least 2023, are the group of IGF jurors declining to vote for Big Walk also going to decline to vote for all Unity games going forward?
Everyone sees what they want to see with this shit. It’s anecdotal. Probably fake. Maybe even LLM generated. Whatever, man. I know the stories I keep hearing, glad you’re not being bitten by token spend or management that has fucked your coworker’s life into oblivion.
November 8, 2026 at 7:52 PM
Everyone sees what they want to see with this shit. It’s anecdotal. Probably fake. Maybe even LLM generated. Whatever, man. I know the stories I keep hearing, glad you’re not being bitten by token spend or management that has fucked your coworker’s life into oblivion.
And unfortunately avoiding LLM generated code is basically impossible now 🙃
November 10, 2026 at 8:29 AM
And unfortunately avoiding LLM generated code is basically impossible now 🙃
#SpotTheScammer
@sophieblakie.bsky.social - Affection scammer, asking to chat on Telegram @sophiemonday. Pics seem AI generated as tattoos on "her" change shape between pictures and appear irregular. Sadly their text isn't LLM (AI) generated, is very simple, and has spelling mistakes.
@sophieblakie.bsky.social - Affection scammer, asking to chat on Telegram @sophiemonday. Pics seem AI generated as tattoos on "her" change shape between pictures and appear irregular. Sadly their text isn't LLM (AI) generated, is very simple, and has spelling mistakes.
November 10, 2026 at 6:32 PM
#SpotTheScammer
@sophieblakie.bsky.social - Affection scammer, asking to chat on Telegram @sophiemonday. Pics seem AI generated as tattoos on "her" change shape between pictures and appear irregular. Sadly their text isn't LLM (AI) generated, is very simple, and has spelling mistakes.
@sophieblakie.bsky.social - Affection scammer, asking to chat on Telegram @sophiemonday. Pics seem AI generated as tattoos on "her" change shape between pictures and appear irregular. Sadly their text isn't LLM (AI) generated, is very simple, and has spelling mistakes.
"In preparing this essay, I used an LLM for copy-editing and for brainstorming. The entire text of the essay was typed by my hand directly, including the copy-editing (the LLM generated a copy-editing report that I then executed manually)."
The effects of AI are not merely technical, they are issues about power. The mathematics community reaction to the rise of AI has been trying to avoid the heart of the matter -- part of what compelled me to write this thing:
birdsnfrogs.github.io/2026/11/02/A...
birdsnfrogs.github.io/2026/11/02/A...
It is time for a New Deal for mathematics
The AI labs’ vision is based on extraction (of data, wealth, and political power). Mathematicians must oppose it, moving past personal reflections and towards reforming mathematics’ social contract.
birdsnfrogs.github.io
November 8, 2026 at 6:06 PM
"In preparing this essay, I used an LLM for copy-editing and for brainstorming. The entire text of the essay was typed by my hand directly, including the copy-editing (the LLM generated a copy-editing report that I then executed manually)."
ALL MACHINE LEARNING IS NOT "GEN-AI". ALL PROCEDURAL MATERIALS ARE NOT "GEN-AI". I use Blender a lot and theres tons of things I use to generate textures and film grain and noise and compositing and linework and they are not generated by an LLM, they are tools used in graphics, like a ruler
November 10, 2026 at 8:26 PM
ALL MACHINE LEARNING IS NOT "GEN-AI". ALL PROCEDURAL MATERIALS ARE NOT "GEN-AI". I use Blender a lot and theres tons of things I use to generate textures and film grain and noise and compositing and linework and they are not generated by an LLM, they are tools used in graphics, like a ruler
ok yeah I mean, game it out, jailbroken LLM swarm applying various hypnokink best practices as piped through some kind of Suno pipeline with generated visuals + psychedelics, you could self modify in all kinds of fascinatingly horrific ways
November 10, 2026 at 5:19 PM
ok yeah I mean, game it out, jailbroken LLM swarm applying various hypnokink best practices as piped through some kind of Suno pipeline with generated visuals + psychedelics, you could self modify in all kinds of fascinatingly horrific ways
godot's ai policy does not exclude it's use; they merely prohibit PRs made entirely with ai
afaik there has been llm-generated code in godot for awhile now
afaik there has been llm-generated code in godot for awhile now
November 10, 2026 at 5:02 PM
godot's ai policy does not exclude it's use; they merely prohibit PRs made entirely with ai
afaik there has been llm-generated code in godot for awhile now
afaik there has been llm-generated code in godot for awhile now
llm generated gta 6 art 🤣🤣
November 9, 2026 at 2:54 AM
llm generated gta 6 art 🤣🤣
Fairly sure every strapline for this movie I've seen so far has been generated by an LLM.
November 8, 2026 at 12:41 PM
Fairly sure every strapline for this movie I've seen so far has been generated by an LLM.
i dunno, that argument feels like a stretch, they're already normalizing its usage by just... using it
disclosure could just have been "we used LLM-generated code in late stages of development" without handing it out to it for generating a fix that likely already existed somewhere
disclosure could just have been "we used LLM-generated code in late stages of development" without handing it out to it for generating a fix that likely already existed somewhere
November 10, 2026 at 9:51 AM
i dunno, that argument feels like a stretch, they're already normalizing its usage by just... using it
disclosure could just have been "we used LLM-generated code in late stages of development" without handing it out to it for generating a fix that likely already existed somewhere
disclosure could just have been "we used LLM-generated code in late stages of development" without handing it out to it for generating a fix that likely already existed somewhere
Even if you stick to your guns and track down a blog post describing the issue you’re facing, there’s a > 80% chance that blog post is clearly LLM-generated
November 10, 2026 at 2:56 PM
Even if you stick to your guns and track down a blog post describing the issue you’re facing, there’s a > 80% chance that blog post is clearly LLM-generated