The Munich Regional Court has ruled that AI music generator Suno unlawfully used copyrighted songs by artists such as Boney M and Lou Bega to train its models without obtaining licenses. GEMA, a German licensing agency, successfully argued that Suno's actions breached both German and US copyright laws, leading to potential damages and requiring other AI companies to license music from GEMA's repertoire. The decision underscores the importance of respecting creators' rights in the age of artificial intelligence, with GEMA's CEO emphasizing that AI models built on stolen intellectual property lack legal protection. This ruling follows previous cases against OpenAI and Suno, which faced lawsuits for large-scale copyright violations. The court's verdict strengthens Europe's position as a cultural hub and highlights growing concerns about AI-generated music dominating platforms like Deezer, where it now accounts for over 50% of daily uploads. Industry efforts to combat AI-generated content include tools for detection and policy changes, such as the UK government abandoning plans allowing unlicensed use of copyrighted works by AI firms.

Jackie 'O' Henderson has filed court documents alleging that her co-host Kyle Sandilands caused her post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) through ongoing workplace bullying. The sworn statement, released by the Federal Court, details how Sandilands' 'unpredictable and erratic' behaviour, including belittling and humiliating comments, contributed to her mental health decline. Medical reports from Dr Jonathan Phillips and Dr Emma Agnew state that Henderson's PTSD stems from the bullying, lack of organisational support, and public nature of the interactions. The case involves Henderson's lawsuit against ARN, the owner of KIIS FM, over alleged breaches of workplace rights and misleading statements to the ASX. Sandilands, who was terminated from his contract after being accused of serious misconduct, has since sued ARN for $12 million. Henderson seeks at least $82.25 million in damages, with her case ongoing. The affidavit highlights her growing anxiety and emotional distress, describing a workplace environment where she felt 'emotionally unsafe' despite outwardly positive interactions. This legal battle follows the collapse of Henderson and Sandilands' radio show, with both hosts separately suing the station.

Prince Harry and six other high-profile individuals, including Elton John, have been ordered to pay an initial £9.5 million to the Daily Mail newspaper following their unsuccessful privacy invasion lawsuit. The judgment, delivered by Justice Matthew Nicklin, mandates the payment by August 28, with the remainder of the costs to be reimbursed later. The claimants, who alleged malpractice by Associated Newspapers, lost their High Court case in London, where evidence was deemed insufficient to support their claims. The publisher had denied the allegations, citing legitimate sources for the reporting. This case marks the end of a series of lawsuits against tabloid publishers for alleged unlawful tactics like phone hacking. Harry previously won a 2023 case against the Daily Mirror for phone hacking and received an apology from The Sun in 2023. His legal battles, which strained his relationship with the royal family, are part of his broader effort to reform media practices he believes damaged his personal life and relationships. The case also highlights ongoing tensions between the royal family and the press, with Harry blaming the media for the death of his mother, Princess Diana, and attacks on his wife, Meghan Markle.

The article details a legal case where the father of a teenager accused of a crime is pursuing a wrongful dismissal claim against his former employer. The case highlights concerns about corporate accountability and the intersection of personal responsibility with legal action. While the article initially focuses on the father's lawsuit, it also touches on broader societal issues such as the consequences of youth violence and the role of institutions in addressing such cases. The narrative includes references to other news stories, such as a dental regulator's warning about an unauthorized practitioner and a political controversy involving a mayoral candidate. However, the central story revolves around the father's legal battle, which raises questions about workplace rights and the potential for corporate liability in cases involving personal misconduct. The article's structure blends multiple news items, but the core content centers on the legal dispute and its implications for both the individual and the broader community.

Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon faced backlash after a federal judge dismissed the Justice Department's lawsuit against Portland police. The case, which sought to enforce a 2012 reform agreement, was rejected due to Dhillon's social media post criticizing Portland authorities. U.S. District Judge Michael H. Simon ruled that her tone in a tweet and demand letter exhibited 'all the hallmarks of a threat' and attempted intimidation. The judge noted the post appeared to signal to Portland police that non-compliance with Justice Department demands could lead to legal consequences. While the 2012 settlement agreement remains active, courts have previously rejected all 15 of Dhillon's voter roll lawsuits. Her actions have drawn scrutiny amid rumors of her potential promotion to associate attorney general. The ruling highlights tensions between federal oversight and local law enforcement practices, particularly regarding political influence in legal proceedings.

A federal judge has certified for appellate review whether President Donald Trump's January 6, 2021 tweet about the Capitol riot was protected by presidential immunity. U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta initially ruled the tweet was an official act and immune from civil liability under the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. However, the judge acknowledged the tweet 'arguably poured gasoline on the fire' but maintained that any presidential action, even if controversial, becomes official if it occurs after receiving official advice. Plaintiffs, including former Rep. Barbara Lee, argue the tweet was a conspiratorial act to block Congress from certifying the 2020 election results. The case involves allegations of coordination with Rudy Giuliani, the Proud Boys, and the Oath Keepers. The deadline to file an appeal with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is August 5, with the opening brief due by August 10. The ruling allows the plaintiffs to challenge the immunity claim without waiting for the full case to conclude, highlighting the legal and political implications of the president's actions during the riot.

Canada's justice minister has ordered a new trial for Daniel Jolivet, a Quebec man convicted of four murders in 1994, after concerns emerged about the fairness of his initial trial. Jolivet, who spent 33 years in prison, was released on bail in December 2025 pending a federal review. Justice Minister Sean Fraser cited reasonable grounds to believe a miscarriage of justice occurred, emphasizing the need to restore public trust in the legal system. Jolivet, who has consistently denied the charges, expressed relief at the decision, calling it 'freedom' and vowing to focus on self-care. His lawyer, Nicholas St-Jacques, highlighted the importance of the ruling for victims of wrongful convictions, stressing the need for formal acquittal. The Crown prosecutor's office will now assess whether to proceed with the case. Jolivet's case, which involved the 1994 convictions of four murders in Brossard, Quebec, was initially overturned on appeal but reinstated by the Supreme Court in 2000. His repeated requests for review were denied until 2025, when federal authorities acknowledged potential justice flaws. The decision underscores ongoing debates about systemic errors in criminal convictions and the complexities of overturning long-standing legal rulings.

The Why How Do Company has successfully won a lawsuit against shareholder Yamaguchi, emphasizing its commitment to protecting its reputation.

A federal jury ruled against GrooMore for misappropriating trade secrets from MoeGo, highlighting the need for integrity in pet care tech.