But *in theory*, does it have to?
Let’s talk about the theoretical curse of multilinguality for embedding space structure.
But *in theory*, does it have to?
Let’s talk about the theoretical curse of multilinguality for embedding space structure.
@crystinaz.bsky.social
@oxxoskeets.bsky.social
@dayeonki.bsky.social @onadegibert.bsky.social
@crystinaz.bsky.social
@oxxoskeets.bsky.social
@dayeonki.bsky.social @onadegibert.bsky.social
hjosephinegiles.substack.com/p/in-transla...
hjosephinegiles.substack.com/p/in-transla...
No borders, sure. But language rights are, I'd say, worth dying for.
No borders, sure. But language rights are, I'd say, worth dying for.
This is work with @tomlim.bsky.social, @jlibovicky.bsky.social, and Alex Fraser.
arxiv.org/abs/2502.06468
#newpaper #NLP #NLProc
This is work with @tomlim.bsky.social, @jlibovicky.bsky.social, and Alex Fraser.
arxiv.org/abs/2502.06468
#newpaper #NLP #NLProc
🥳I'm excited to share that I've started as a postdoc at Uppsala University NLP @uppsalanlp.bsky.social, working with Joakim Nivre on topics related to constructions and multilinguality!
🙏Many thanks to the Walter Benjamin Programme of the DFG for making this possible.
🥳I'm excited to share that I've started as a postdoc at Uppsala University NLP @uppsalanlp.bsky.social, working with Joakim Nivre on topics related to constructions and multilinguality!
🙏Many thanks to the Walter Benjamin Programme of the DFG for making this possible.
Come check it out if your interested in multilingual linguistic evaluation of LLMs (there will be parse trees on the slides! There's still use for syntactic structure!)
arxiv.org/abs/2504.02768
Come check it out if your interested in multilingual linguistic evaluation of LLMs (there will be parse trees on the slides! There's still use for syntactic structure!)
arxiv.org/abs/2504.02768
Multilinguality claims are often based on downstream tasks like QA & MT, while *formal* linguistic competence remains hard to gauge in lots of languages
Meet MultiBLiMP!
(joint work w/ @jumelet.bsky.social & @weissweiler.bsky.social)
Introducing 🌍MultiBLiMP 1.0: A Massively Multilingual Benchmark of Minimal Pairs for Subject-Verb Agreement, covering 101 languages!
We present over 125,000 minimal pairs and evaluate 17 LLMs, finding that support is still lacking for many languages.
🧵⬇️
Multilinguality claims are often based on downstream tasks like QA & MT, while *formal* linguistic competence remains hard to gauge in lots of languages
Meet MultiBLiMP!
(joint work w/ @jumelet.bsky.social & @weissweiler.bsky.social)
Read it here: arxiv.org/abs/2502.06468
Read it here: arxiv.org/abs/2502.06468
Looking forward to exciting work on computational linguistics, interpretability, and multilinguality!
Find out more on our website lionlabnlp.github.io
Looking forward to exciting work on computational linguistics, interpretability, and multilinguality!
Find out more on our website lionlabnlp.github.io
- Efficient evaluation (Nov 5, 16:30, poster session 3)
- MT difficulty (Nov 7, 12:30, findings 3)
- COMET-poly (Nov 8, 11:00, WMT)
(DM to meet 🌿 )
- Efficient evaluation (Nov 5, 16:30, poster session 3)
- MT difficulty (Nov 7, 12:30, findings 3)
- COMET-poly (Nov 8, 11:00, WMT)
(DM to meet 🌿 )
Main conf: @kathaem.bsky.social presented joint work w/ @tomlim.bsky.social, @jlibovicky.bsky.social and Alex Fraser: Beyond Literal Token Overlap: Token Alignability for Multilinguality aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-s...
Main conf: @kathaem.bsky.social presented joint work w/ @tomlim.bsky.social, @jlibovicky.bsky.social and Alex Fraser: Beyond Literal Token Overlap: Token Alignability for Multilinguality aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-s...
Why do we publish English only resources?
linguistic findings?❌ weak due to focus on a single language
support model multilinguality? ❌so why this specific morphologically poor language?
Spoken by a large population?❌ why don't work on Mandarin instead?
Why do we publish English only resources?
linguistic findings?❌ weak due to focus on a single language
support model multilinguality? ❌so why this specific morphologically poor language?
Spoken by a large population?❌ why don't work on Mandarin instead?