Residents pressed the Newtown Board of Supervisors over the future of a sewer-authority parcel and questioned a prior $11.5 million spending effort; callers urged transparency, asked the board to reconsider the township solicitor, and warned against rezoning the land for 87 townhouses.

The board took final action to adopt a joint municipal zoning amendment to provide for data centers in the jointure (targeting Wrightstown/Quarry District). Dozens of residents urged stronger setbacks, water protections and financial safeguards before enactment.

After a public hearing with extensive resident concerns about setbacks, water use, lighting and protections, supervisors enacted a joint municipal zoning ordinance amendment to provide for data centers limited to Wrightstown Township; board noted the ordinance is an initial layer of protection that could be revised only with re-advertising.

The board voted to send a revised data-center ordinance to the jointure for advertisement, making the draft public and scheduling a future hearing while members and residents press for additional expert briefings and edits.

The board voted to send a revised data center ordinance to the joint solicitor for advertisement and a public hearing; residents pressed for clearer public notice and revisions before final adoption.

Multiple residents told the board the pending Chandler Hall sale may require state redesignation from nonprofit to for-profit and urged writing the attorney general to preserve services; board members said they will monitor and gather information.

At the July 8 meeting the township solicitor summarized Wrightstown Township's requested revisions to the joint municipal zoning ordinance (JMZO) data center draft, including on-site utilities, limiting attachment of other ordinances, fire marshal review and added noise protections; supervisors were told each municipality must re-review and re-vote the amendment.

On a 3–2 vote, the supervisors authorized execution of a memorandum of understanding obligating township opioid settlement funds to Bucks County, which officials say will supply a co‑responder for Newtown; board members noted county assurances but said no written guarantee was provided at the meeting.

The board voted to forward a joint zoning amendment that would define and permit data centers (minimum lot size 25 acres) to the jointure for a joint public hearing; residents urged stricter limits and questioned whether the jointure’s QAA district leaves Newtown adequately protected.

On June 24 the New Town Township Supervisors authorized sending a joint zoning amendment that would add 'data center' as a permitted use (minimum lot size 25 acres) to the jointure for advertising a public hearing. Supervisors and residents debated whether the 25‑acre threshold and the jointure process sufficiently protect New Town.

Supervisors debated whether to obligate Newtown’s $133,000 opioid-settlement distribution to Bucks County under a proposed MOU and ultimately voted to table action to allow further research; proponents said obligating funds preserves future distributions and supports the county co‑responder program, opponents sought firmer local guarantees.

After extended debate and public comment, the New Town Township Board of Supervisors voted to table a memorandum of understanding that would obligate this year's ~$133,000 opioid settlement distribution to Bucks County, citing deadline pressure, uncertainty over allowable uses and interest in exploring local options.