It’s the same skill that we teach in social studies: you need to look at the source’s OPCVL. The origin (who wrote it), the purpose (why did they write, who was the intended audience).
It’s the same skill that we teach in social studies: you need to look at the source’s OPCVL. The origin (who wrote it), the purpose (why did they write, who was the intended audience).
You can’t ascertain the OPCVL of a source if you don’t have a clue who wrote it, or why. Answering those questions about a source is fundamental to critical analysis.
You can’t ascertain the OPCVL of a source if you don’t have a clue who wrote it, or why. Answering those questions about a source is fundamental to critical analysis.
Do you not see how this is problematic?
A reader of this article has no way of analyzing the OPCVL of the sources cited in this footnote, much less the
Do you not see how this is problematic?
A reader of this article has no way of analyzing the OPCVL of the sources cited in this footnote, much less the
📺 Watch now: youtu.be/Ndj_5AE4Tvo
#IBHistory #OPCVL #IBRevision #Paper1 #IBDP #OPCVL
📺 Watch now: youtu.be/Ndj_5AE4Tvo
#IBHistory #OPCVL #IBRevision #Paper1 #IBDP #OPCVL