#OfANYTHING
LightNews LightNews
shoezq.bsky.social
This needs to be shared EVERYWHERE!!! #BelieveTheWomen #BelieveTheChildren #PedophilesShouldNotBePresident #OfANYTHING #ExposeThemAll #TheRichPredatorClass #FollowTheMoney #WydenExposedTheWireTransfers #EatTheRich
July 24, 2025 at 9:15 PM
illuminatus.bsky.social
There’s not a lot of conserving ofanything going on there any more, other than the interest of a very small number of lobbyists and donors. And it’s been that way for a generation or more now
March 29, 2026 at 2:47 PM
raccoon.pictures
you can take text from a short form vid if you cant think ofanything
August 29, 2026 at 6:59 PM
trickcyclist.bsky.social
He is speaking only to the part of the audience that will align the two event without issue. He always does that what make him so dangerous, there are many, who will never give any thought to rational analysis ofanything he utters.
October 28, 2024 at 7:28 PM
panagonia.bsky.social
His elitism seeps out of him. He has no self awareness, no humbleness, no true concern ofanything beyond his own needs. He exudes being pampered all his life withthe capacity for pouting & whining when things didn't go his way. He has no authenticity & you know, he would betray youfor hisown gain.
March 22, 2025 at 2:52 PM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
EFTA01977642.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01977642
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01977641 | EFTA01977642 Dear All, I can't thinking ofanything more interesting than spending an afternoon talking with David Deutsch. So here's a preview of a new EDGE piece which includes a 47-minute video which is worth every minute of your very valuable time. Hope you enjoy it. Comments for a Reality Club discussion are welcome. In addition, we're trying something new for this edition - using an artist's representational drawing rather than the usual photo. We're divided on it - some of us like it. Some don't. I would appreciate any feedback you may have. Best regards, JB John Brockman Mobil President Edge Foundation, Inc. tel: fax: Visit EDGE "The World's Smartest Website" (The Guardian *************************************** t: ******************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacationegmail.com and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_00464218 EFTA01977642 Epstein Web iOS app on the App Store.
March 17, 2026 at 9:33 AM
hattiejosh.bsky.social
No way, you mean the same network of channels that keep Michael Waltrip on payroll?
Michael Waltrip mentioned in the Epstein files: "To: Jeffre E teirfeevacationSgmail.com] From: Sent Thur 5/30/2013 7:01:57 PM Subject: Re: The general manager ofMWR called • to ask about it. Someone sent them an email with links to some articles about me, the one with me and Story and Prince Andrew. I was on the call as well..I may have misunderstood, but it sounded like he said there was an article on Gawker that talked about dating me and referencing that story. He could have been referring to an old Gawker link the person may have emailed to them as well. We then called the 2 owners ofMWR, Rob Kauffman and Michael Waltrip to discuss with them and answer any questions they may have. They are good with it on a personal level, but said they have to keep the best interest of the team in mind and the CEO of Aaron's is the kind of person who doesn't even want someone holding a beer in their hands while wearing an Aarons shirt. Rob doesn't think they will care what the truth really is, just what the perception is. They don't intend to bring it to Aaron's attention right now and are hoping they won't find out. We are going to try and confirm with MWR who sent the email, but we think its a girl B has had issues with in the past who is behind the blog. We think she's the one who also emailed his current sponsor, Dollar General. We have been working with a web reputation company for me. Before when you googled girlfriend" the first thing that came up was the blog which was saying nasty things about us. They wanted to push that down in the list, so they needed to create content with that term to move to the top. Also, when you googled my name, the first thing that would come up was the article about Prince Andrew, so they are trying to push that down too. Rob has asked that we hire a lawyer to (1/2) go through the documents online and to basically write a statement saying they've researched the case and that I was never convicted ofanything and that all the articles are slanderous and gossip and overblown. has a lawyer he uses in NC he's going to have do this. He may want to speak with Jack if that's OK. We won't give the statement to anyone unless its necessary if sponsors question it. They just think its a good thing to have a third party professional statement since there is nothing out there from me or any statements denying my involvement. On May 30, 2013, at 7:15 AM, Jeffrey Epstein leevacation@gmail,com> wrote: ask who exactly who called and what did they say? the only bad story on line we can find are from a blog with two or three retards, this can't be it. Im not sure why you have your the girlfriend blog. that attracts nuts and unnecessary attention."
February 17, 2026 at 6:37 PM
bev.bsky.social
Gee thanks! *blushing* RT @Worvolutionary @theinventher You're brilliant! Such authority...who wouldn't listen to you. BEV4PREZ #ofanything
December 27, 2024 at 3:36 PM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
EFTA01118355.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01118355
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01118354 | EFTA01118355 This instrument prepared by and should be returned to: Paul Tbibadcau Suite 306 205 Worth Avenue Palm Beach, FL 33480 CONTRACTOR'S FINAL PAYMENT AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Joseph Doran, who after first being duly mom, deposes and says ofhis personal lmowledge, the following: 1. He Is the president ofAnything Electric, Inc., which does business In the StateofFlorida, hereinafter refened to as "Connector". 2. Contractor, pursuant to a contract with Jeffrey Epstein, hereinafter referred to as "Owner", has furnished or caused tobe famished labor materials and services for the construction ofcatain improvements to real property as more particularly described in said contract 3. This affidavit is executed by Contractor in accordance with section 713.06 of the Florida Statutes for the purposa of obtaining final payment from the Owna in the amount of 52,696.1T 4. All work to be preformed under the contract has been fully completed, and all tenors under the direct contract, have been paid in full, except the following listed lienors: NAME OF L1ENOR AMOUNT DUE NONE i i Signed sealed and delivered, this y day ofDecember, 2010. By: Joseph Doran Presiderlcof Anything Electric, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH Sworn to mid subscribed before me this personally known to me orproduced •• 't V day of December, 2008, by Joseph Doran, who is , as identification. Notary Public State of Florida at large at commission expires: EU?A9Elli D. SMITH IX( COARISW2 • DO 545483 EXPIRES. June 29, 2014 1 Bariplitru xdarf Mkt LP:dinners EFTA01118355
May 10, 2026 at 1:05 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-3/3 — EFTA01080392.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01080392
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01080289 | EFTA01080392 corruptly in furtherance of an offer, payment. promise to pay. or authorization of the payment of any money, or offer, gift. promise to give, or authorization of the giving ofanything of value to— official the purpose of which is to expedite or to secure the performance of a routine governmental action by a foreign official, political party. or parry official. (I) any foreign official for purposes of— (c) Affirmative defenses (A) (i) influencing any act or decision of such foreign official in his official capacity. (ii) inducing such foreign official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official, or (iii) securing any improper advantage: or It shall be an affirmative defense to actions under subsection (a) or (i) of this section that— (8) inducing such foreign official to use his influence with a foreign government or instrumentality thereof to affect or influence any act or decision of such government or instrumentality, in order to assist such domestic concern in obtaining or retaining business for or with. or directing business to. any person; or (2) any foreign political party or official thereof or any candidate for foreign political office for purposes of— (A) (i) influencing any act or decision of such party, official. or candidate in its or his official capacity, (ii) inducingsuch party, official.or tindidate to do or omit to do an act in violation of the lawful duty ofsuch party, official, or candidate, or (iii) securing any improper advantage; or (1) the payment, gift. offer, or promise of anything of value that was made. was lawful under the written laws and regulations of the foreign official's political party's. parry official's. or candidate's country; or (2) the payment, gift. offer, or promise of anything of value that was made, was a reasonable and bona fide expenditure, such as travel and lodging expenses. incurred by or on behalf of a foreign official, party. party official, or candidate and was directly related to— (A) the promotion. demonstration, or explanation ofproducts or services; or (8) the execution or performance of a contract with a foreign government or agency thereof (d) Injunctive relief (8) inducing such parry, official, or candidate to use its or his influence with a foreign government or instrumentality thereofto affect or influence any act or decision of such government or instrumentality. in order to assist such domestic concern in obtaining or rttainingbusiness for or with, or directingbusiness to. any person; (3) any person, while knowing that all or a portion of such money or thingofvalue will be offered, given, or promised,direcdy or indirectly. to any foreign official, to any foreign political party or official thereof. or to any candidate for foreign political office, for purposes of— (A) (i) influencing any act or decision of such foreign official, political party. party official, or candidate in his or its official capacity, (ii) inducing such foreign official, political party, party official, or candidate to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such foreign official, political party. party official.or candidate,or (iii) securing any improper advantage; or (8) inducing such foreign official, political party. party official, or candidate to use his or its influence with a foreign government or instrumentality thereof to affect or influence any act or decision of such government or instrumentality, in order to assist such domestic concern in obtaining or retaining business for or with, or directing business to, any person. (b) Exception for routine governmental action Subsections (a) and (i) of this section shall not apply to any Facilitatingor expeditingpayment to a foreign official, political party. or party (1) When it appears to the Attorney General than any domestic concern to which this section applies, or officer, director, employee, agent. or stockholder thereof. is engaged. or about to engage. in any act or practice constituting a violation of subsection (a) or (i) of this section. the Attorney General may. in his discretion, bring a civil action in an appropriate district court of the United States to enjoin such act or practice. and upon a proper showing. a permanent injunction or a temporary restraining order shall be granted without bond. (2) For the purpose of any civil investigation which, in the opinion of the Attorney General. is necessary and proper to enforce this section, the Attorney General or his designee are empowered to administer oaths and affirmations. subpoena witnesses. cake evidence, and require the production of any books. papers. or other documents which the Attorney General deems relevant or material to such investigation. The attendance of witnesses and the production of documentary evidence may be required from any place in the United States, or any territory. possession, or commonwealth of the United States. at any designated place ofhearing. (3) In case of contumacy by, or refusal to obey a subpoena issued to. any person, the Attorney General may invoke the aid of any court of the United States within the jurisdiction of which such investigation or proceeding is carried on, or where such person resides or carries on business. in requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of books. papers, or other documents. Any such court may issue an order requiring such person to appear before the Attorney General or his designee, there to produce records, if so 95 EFTA01080392
May 9, 2026 at 12:37 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
EFTA02226851.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta02226851
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA02226850 | EFTA02226851 Karyna's cell: Randy Clum is head of security at Bard and will be organizing the wind sock as well as the fire department which is required for landing the hell. Randy's cell: AnneMaric, can you please provide the contact name and phone number of who will be on the ground awaiting Jeffrey's arrival? My cell in case ofanything: effrey Epstein *** DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected/suspicious looking cmails *** EFTA_R1_00971377 EFTA02226851
April 1, 2026 at 5:15 PM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-3/3 — EFTA01723533.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01723533
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01723517 | EFTA01723533 12)003 08/08/2007 WED 17:08 FAX Public Law 544 - 106th Congress 2nd Session ILIL 3048 AN ACT To amend Title IS, United Stairs Code, to provide clearer coverage ova ducats against former Presidents tau] members of their families, and for other purposes. Bc it matted by the Sense and House ofRepresentatives of the United Salts of Amuica in Congress assembled. SEC. 5 (a)IN GENERAL- Section 3486(a) of fine IS, United Stales Codc, is amended — (1) so that peraueph (1) reads to follows: (1)(A) In any investigation of— (OW a Federal health ewe offense; or (1) a Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children. the Attorney General; or (ii).an offmsc under section 871 or 879, or a threat against a person protected by the United Slates Secret Service tmda paragraph (5) or (6) of section 3056, if theDirector of the Secret Service dctornines that the threat coostiuning the offense or thethreat against the person protected Is imminent, the Secretary of the Treasury, may issue in writing and cause to be served a subpoena requiring the production and testimony described in subparagraph 03). (Et) lixcept la provided In subparagraph (C). asubpoena issued under subparagraph (A)may require —(i) the production of any records or other things relevant to the investigation; and (ii) testimony by the custodian of the things requital to be produced concerning the production and authenticity of those things (C) A subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) with respect to a provider ofelectronic communication service or remote computing service, in an investigation of a Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or phase of children shill nor extend beyond — (I) requiting that provider to disclose the name, address, local and long distance telephone toll billing records, telephone number or other subscriber number or identity, and length of service of a subscribe to or customer of such service and the types of services the subsuibtr or customer utilized, which maybe relevant to an authorized law enforcement inquiry; or 0i) requiring a custodian of the records of that provider to give testimony concerning the production and authentication of such records or information. (D) As used in this paragraph, the term 'Federal offense involving die casual exploitation of abuse ofchildren' scans an offense under section 1201, 2241(e). 2242, 2243, 2251. 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 3422, or 2423, in which thc victim is ice individual who has Mat attained the age of la yeers.'; (2) in paragraph (3)-. (A) by Inserting 'relating to a Federal health care offense' after 'production ofrecords% and (B) by adding at the end the following: 'The production of things in any ether ease may be required from any place within the United States or subject to the laws orjurisdictiOre of the United Stares; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (5) M any time before thc return dale specified io the summons, the pawn or entity summoned may, in the United States &strict cowl for the district In which that person or entity does business or resides, petition for an orda modifying or setting aside the summons. or a prohibition of disclosure ordered by a court under paragraph (6). (6)(A) A United State district court for the district in which the summons is or will be served, upon application of the United States, may issue an ex pate order that no person or entity disclose to any other person or entity (other than to an attorney in order to obtain legal advice) the existence of such summons fora period of up to 90 days. (B) Suds order may be issued on a showing that the things being sought may be relevant to the investigation and there is reason to believe that such disclosure may result in— (i) endangerment to the life or physical safety ofany person; (u) flight to avoid prosecution; destruction ofor tampering with evidence; or (iv) intimidation Of potential witnesses. (C) An order under this paragraph may be renewed for additional periods of up to 90 days upon a showing that the circumstances described in subparagnoth(3) continue to exist (7) A summons issued under this section shall not require the production ofanything that would be protected from production tinder the Ma:dards applicable to asubpoena duos tecum issued bye court of the United States. (8)Ifno case or proceeding arises from the production ofrecords a other things pursuant to this section within a masa:table time atm those records or things are produced, the agency to which those records or things were delivered shall, upon wrinen demand made by the person producing those records or things, return them to that person except where the production required was only of copies rather than originals. (9) A subpoena issued under paragraph (I)(AXi)(11) or (I)(A)(ii) may roquiro production as soon as possible, but in no event Ices than 24 hours after service of the subpoena. (10) As soon as practicable following the issuance of a subpoena under paragraph (l)(Ard), the Secretary of the Tretonry shall notify the Attorney Clausal of its issuance:. (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS(1) SECTIONHEADING- The heading for section 3486 of title IS. United Stares (lode, is amended by striking: EFTA01723533
March 8, 2026 at 3:32 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-3/3 — EFTA01696829.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01696829
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01696804 | EFTA01696829 Public Law 544 - I 06th Congress 2nd Session H.R. 3048 AN ACT • To amend Title 18, United States Code, to provide clearer coverage over threats against former Presidents and members of their families, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. SEC. 5 (a) IN GENERAL- Section 3486(a) of tide IS, United States Code, is amended — (1) so that paragraph (I) reads as follows: (IXA) In any investigation of— W(t) a Federal health care offense; or (II) a Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children, the Attorney General; or (i) an offense under section 871 or 879, or a threat against a person protected by the United States Secret Service under paragraph (5) or (6) of section 3056, if the Director of the Secret Service determines that the threat constituting the offense or the threat against the person protected is imminent, the Secretary of the Treasury, may issue in writing and cause to be served a subpoena requiring the production and testimony described in subparagraph (B). (B) Except as provided in subparagraph (C), a subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) may require — (i) the production of any records or other things relevant to the investigation; and (ii) testimony by the custodian of the things required to be produced concerning the production and authenticity of those things. (C) A subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) with respect to a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service, in an investigation of a Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children shall not extend beyond — (i) requiring that provider to disclose the name, address, local and long distance telephone toll billing records, telephone number or other subscriber number or identity, and length of service of a subscriber to or customer of such service and the types of services the subscriber or customer utilized, which may be relevant to an authorized law enforcement inquiry; or (ii) requiring a custodian of the records of that provider to give testimony concerning the production and authentication of such records or information. (D) As used in this paragraph, the term 'Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children' means an offense under section 1201, 2241(e), 2242, 2243, 2251, 225IA, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423, in which the victim is an individual who has not attained the age of I8 years.; (2) in paragraph (3)— (A) by inserting 'relating to a Federal health care offense' after 'production of records'; and (B) by adding at the end the following: 'The production of things in any other case may be required from any place within the United States or subject to the laws or jurisdiction of the United States.'; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (5) At any time before the return date specified in the summons, the person or entity summoned may, in the United States district court for the district in which that person or entity does business or resides, petition for an order modifying or setting aside the summons, or a prohibition of disclosure ordered by a court under paragraph (6). (6)(A) A United State district court for the district in which the summons is or will be served, upon application of the United States, may issue an ex parte order that no person or entity disclose to any other person or entity (other than to an attorney in order to obtain legal advice) the existence of such summons for a period of up to 90 days. (B) Such order may be issued on a showing that the things being sought may be relevant to the investigation and there is reason to believe that such disclosure may result in— () endangerment to the life or physical safety of any person; (i) flight to avoid prosecution; (ill) destruction of or tampering with evidence; or (iv) intimidation of potential witnesses. (C) An order under this paragraph may be renewed for additional periods ofup to 90 days upon a showing that the circumstances described in subparagraph (B) continue to exist. (7) A summons issued under this section shall not require the production ofanything that would be protected from production under the standards applicable to a subpoena duces tecum issued by a court of the United States. (8)If no case or proceeding arises from the production of records or other things pursuant to this section within a reasonable time after those records or things are produced, the agency to which those records or things were delivered shall, upon written demand made by the person producing those records or things, return them to that person, except where the production required was only of copies rather than originals. (9) A subpoena issued under paragraph (1)(A)(0(Il) or (1)(A)(ii) may require production as soon as possible, but in no event less than 24 hours after service of the subpoena. (10) As soon as practicable following the issuance of a subpoena under paragraph (1)(A)(ii), the Secretary of the Treasury shall notify the Attorney General of its issuance.'. (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS(I) SECTION HEADING. The heading for section 3486 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking: EFTA01696829
March 7, 2026 at 5:28 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-3/3 — EFTA01696771.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01696771
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01696704 | EFTA01696771 • Public LaW 544 - 106th Congress . 2nd Session H.R. 3048 AN ACT • To amend Title 18, United States Code, to provide clearer coverage over threats against former Presidents and members of their families, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresentatives of the United Suites of America in Congress assembled. SEC. 5 (a) IN GENERAL- Section 3486(a) of title 18,'United States Cod; is amended — (I) so that paragraph (1) reads as follows: (I)(A) In any investigation Of— (iXI) a Federal health care offense; or (II) a Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children, the Attorney General; or (ii) an offense under section 871 or 879, or a threat against a person protected by the United States Secret Service under paragraph (5) or (6) of section 3056, if the Director of the Secret Service determines that the threat constituting the offense or the threat against the person protected is imminent, the Secretary of the Treasury, may issue in writing and cause to be served a subpoena requiring the production and testimony described in subparagraph (B). (B) Except as provided in subparagraph (C), a subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) may require — (i) the production of any records or other things relevant to the investigation; and (ii) testimony by the custodian of the things required to be produced concerning the production and authenticity of those things. (C) A subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) with respect to a provider ofelectronic communication service or remote computing service, in an investigation of a Federal offense involving the seven! exploitation or abuse of children shall not extend beyond (i) requiring that provider to disclose the name, address, local and long distance telephone toll billing records, telephone number or other subscriber number or identity, and length of service ofa subscriber to or customer of such service and the types of services the subscriber or customer utilized, which may be relevant to an authorized law enforcement inquiry; or (ii) requiring a custodian of the records of that provider to give testimony concerning the production and authentication of such records or information. (D) As used In this paragraph, the term 'Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children' means an offense under section 1201, 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260,2421, 2422, or 2423, in which the victim is an individual who has not attained the age of 18 Yom• (2) in Paragraph (3)— (A) by inserting 'relating to a Federal health care offense' after 'production of records'; and (B) by adding at the end the following: 'The production of things in any other case may be required from any place within the United Stet= or subject to the laws or jurisdiction of the United States.; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (5) At any time before the return date specified in the summons, the person or entity summoned may, in the United States district court for the district in which that person or entity does business or resides, petition for an order modifying or setting aside the summons, or a prohibition of disclosure ordered by a court under paragraph (6). (6XA) A United State district court for the district in which the summons is or will be served, upon application of the United States, may issue an ex parte order that no person or entity disclose to any other person or entity (other than to an attorney in order to obtain legal advice) the existence of such summons for a period of up to 90 days. (B) Such order may be issued on a showing that the things being sought may be relevant to the investigationand there is reason to believe that such disclosure may result in-(i) endangerment to the life or physical safety of any person; (ii) flight io avoid prosecution; (iii) destruction of or tampering with evidence; or (iv) intimidation of potential witnesses. (C) An order under this paragraph may be renewed for additional periods of up to 90 days upon a showing that the circumstances described in subparagraph (B) continue to exist. (7) A summons issued under this section shall not require the production ofanything that would be protected from production under the standards applicable to a subpoena duces team issued by a court of the United States. (8) If no case or proceeding arises from the production of records or other things pursuant to this section within a reasonable time after those records or things are produced, the agency to which those records or things were delivered shall, upon written demand made by the person producing those records or things, return them to that person, except where the production required was only of copies rather than originals. (9) A subpoeni issued under paragraph (IXA)(D(U) or (1XAXii) may require production as soon as possible, but in no event less than 24 hours after service of the subpoena (10) As soon as practicable following the issuance of a subpoena under paragraph (T XAXii), the Secretary of the Treasury shall notify the Attorney General of its issuance.'. (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS(I) SECTION HEADING- The heading for section 3486 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking: EFTA01696771
March 7, 2026 at 5:25 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-3/3 — EFTA01696691.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01696691
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01696604 | EFTA01696691 • Public Law 544 • 106th Congress 2nd Session H.R. 3048 AN ACT • To amend Title 18, United States Code, to provide clearer coverage over threats against former Presidents and members of their families, and fur other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. SEC. 5 (a) IN GENERAL- Section 3486(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended — (1) so that paragraph (I) reads as follow= (I XA) in any investigation of— (0(T) a Federal health care offense; or op a Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children, thr Attorney General; or (ii) an offense under section 871 or 879, or a threat against a person protected by the United States Secret Service under paragraph (5) or (6) of section 3056, if the Director of the Secret Service determines that the threat constituting the offense or the threat against the person protected is imminent, the Secretary of the Treasury, may issue in writing and cause to be served a subpoena requiring the production and testimony described in subparagraph (B). (B) Except as provided in subparagraph (C), a subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) may require -- (i) the production of any records or other things relevant to the investigation; and (i) testimony by the custodian of the things required to be produced concerning the production and authenticity of those things. (C) A subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) with respect to a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service, in an investigation of a Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children shall not extend beyond — (i) requiring that provider to disclose the name, address, local and long distance telephone toll billing records, telephone number or other subscriber number or identity, and lengtlof service of a subscriber to or customer of such service and the types of services the subscriber or customer utilized, which may be relevant to an authorized law enforcement inquiry; or (ii) requiring a custodian of the records of that provider to give testimony concerning the production and authentication of such records or information. (D) As used in this paragraph, the term 'Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children' means an offense under section 1201, 2241(4 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423, in which the victim Lean individual who has not attained the age of 18 years.; (2) in Paragraph (3)— (A) by inserting 'relating to a Federal health care offense' after 'production of records'; and (B) by adding at the end the following: 'The production of things in any other case may be required from any place within the United States or subject to the laws or jurisdiction of the United States.'; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (5) At any time before the return date specified in the summons, the person or entity summoned may, in the United States district court for the district in which that person or entity does business or resides, petition for an order modifying or setting aside the summons, or a prohibition of disclosure ordered by a court under paragraph (6). (6)(A) A United State district court for the district in which the summons is or will be served, upon application of the United States, may issue an ex parte order that no person or entity disclose to any other person or entity (other than to an attorney in order to obtain legal advice) the existence of such summons for a period ofup to 90 days. (B) Such order may be issued on a showing that the things being sought may be relevant to the investigation and there is reason to believe that such disclosure may result in— (i) endangerment to the life or physical safety of any person; (ii) flight to avoid prosecution; (iii) destruction ofor tampering with evidence; or (iv) intimidation of potential witnesses. (C) An order under this paragraph may be renewed for additional periods of up to 90 days upon a showing that the circumstances described in subparagraph (B) continue to exist. (7) A summons issued under this section shall not require the production ofanything that would be protected from production under the standards applicable to a subpoena duces tecum issued by a court of the United States. (8) If no case or proceeding arises from the production of records or other things pursuant to this section within a reasonable time after those records or things are produced, the agency to which those records or things were delivered shall, upon written demand made by the person producing those records or things, return them to that person, except where the production required was only of copies rather than originals. (9) A subpoena issued under paragraph (IXAXI)(II) or (I XAXii) may require production as soon as possible, but in no event less than 24 hours after service of the subpoena. (10) As soon as practicable following the issuance of a subpoena under paragraph (I)(AXii), the Secretary of the Treasury shall notify the Attorney General of its issuance.'. (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS( I ) SECTION HEADING-The heading for section 3486 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking: EFTA01696691
March 7, 2026 at 5:21 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-3/3 — EFTA01696662.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01696662
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01696604 | EFTA01696662 Public Law 544 - 106th Congress 2nd Session H.R. 3048 AN ACT • To amend Title 18, United States Code, to provide clearer coverage over threats against former Presidents and members of their families, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. SEC. 5 (a) IN GENERAL- Section 3486(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended -(1) so that paragraph (1) reads as follows: (1XA) In any investigation of-- (i)(I) a Federal health care offense; or (II) a Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children, thr Attorney General; or (ii) an offense under section 871 or 879, or a threat against a person protected by the United States Secret Service under paragraph (5) or (6) of section 3056, if the Director of the Secret Service determines that the threat constituting the offense or the threat against the person protected is imminent, the Secretary of the Treasury, may issue in writing and cause to be served a subpoena requiring the production and testimony described in subparagraph (B). (B) Except as provided in subparagraph (C), a subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) may require — the production of any records or other things relevant to the investigation; and (ii) testimony by the custodian of the things required to be produced concerning the production and authenticity of those things. (C) A subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) with respect to a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service, in an investigation of a Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children shall not extend beyond — (i) requiring that provider to disclose the name, address, local and long distance telephone toll billing records, telephone number or other subscriber number or identity, and length of service ofa subscriber to or customer of such service and the types of services the subscriber or customer utilized, which may be relevant to an authorized law enforcement inquiry; or (Ii) requiring a custodian of the records of that provider to give testimony concerning the production and authentication of such records or information. (D) As used in this paragraph, the term 'Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children' means an offense under section 1201, 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 225IA, 2252, 2252A, 2260,2421, 2422, or 2423, in which the victim is an individual who has not attained the age of 18 years.% (2) in paragraph (3)— • (A) by inserting 'relating to a Federal health care offense after 'production of records; and (B) by adding at the end the following: 'The production of things in any other case may be required from any place within the United . States or subject to the laws or jurisdiction of the United States.; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (5) At any time before the return date specified in the summons, the person or entity summoned may, in the United States district court for the district in which that person or entity does business or resides, petition for an order modifying or setting aside the summons, or a prohibition of disclosure ordered by a court under paragraph (6). (6)(A) A United State district court for the district in which the summons is or will be served, upon application of the United States, may issue an ex pane order that no person or entity disclose to any other person or entity (other than to an attorney in order to obtain legal advice) the existence of such summons for a period of up to 90 days. (B) Such order may be issued on a showing that the things being sought may be relevant to the investigation and there is reason to believe that such disclosure may result in— (i) endangerment to the life or physical safety of any person; (i) flight to avoid prosecution; (iii) destruction ofor tempering with evidence; or (iv) intimidation of potential witnesses. (C) An order under this paragraph may be renewed for additional periods of up to 90 days upon a showing that the circumstances described in subparagraph (B) continue to exist. (7) A summons issued under this section shall not require the production ofanything that would be protected from production under the standards applicable to a subpoena duces tecum issued by a court of the United States. (8) If no case or proceeding arises from the production of records or other things pursuant to this section within a reasonable time after those records or things are produced, the agency to which those records or things were delivered shall, upon written demand made by the person producing those records or things, return them to that person, except where the production required was only of copies rather than originals. (9) A subpoena issued under paragraph (IXAXIXID or (1XAXii) may require production as soon as possible, but in no event less than 24 hours after service of the subpoena. (10) As soon as practicable following the issuance of a subpoena under paragraph (I)(A)(ii), the Secretary of the Treasury shall notify the Attorney General of its issuance.'. (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS(1) SECTION HEADING- The heading for section 3486 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking: EFTA01696662 Epstein Web iOS app on the App Store.
March 7, 2026 at 5:19 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-3/3 — EFTA01696639.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01696639
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01696604 | EFTA01696639 • Public Law 544 - 106th Congress 2nd Session H.R. 3048 AN ACT To amend Title 18, United States Code, to provide clearer coverage over threats against former Presidents and members of their families, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. SEC. 5 (a) IN GENERAL- Section 3486(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended -(1)50 that paragraph (I) reads as follows: (1XA) In any investigation of— (00) a Federal health care offense; or (II) a Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children, the Attorney General; or (ii) an offense under section 871 or 879, or a threat against a person protected by the United States Secret Service under paragraph (5) or (6) of section 3056, if the Director of the Secret Service determines that the threat constituting the offense or the threat against the person protected is imminent, the Secretary of the Treasury, may issue in writing and cause to be served a subpoena requiring the production and testimony described in subparagraph (B). (B) Except as provided in subparagraph (C), a subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) may require (i) the production of any records or other things relevant to the investigation; and (ii) testimony by the custodian of the things required to be produced concerning the production and authenticity of those things. (C) A subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) with respect to a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service, in an investigation Ma Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children shall not extend beyond — () requiring that provider to disclose the name, address, local and long distance telephone toll billing records, telephone number or other subscriber number or identity, and length of service of a subscriber to or customer of such service and the types of services the subscriber or customer utilized, which may be relevant to an authorized law enforcement inquiry; or (ii) requiring a custodian of the records of that provider to give testimony concerning the production and authentication of such records or information. (D) M used in this paragraph, the term 'Pedenl offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children' means an offense under section 1201, 224I(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423, in which the victim is an individual who has not attained the age of 18 years.% (2) in paragraph (3)-(A) by inserting 'relating to a Federal health care offense' after 'production of records'; and (B) by adding at the end the following: 'The production of things in any other case may be required from any place within the United States or subject to the laws or jurisdiction of the United States'; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (5) At any time before the return date specified in the summons, the person or entity summoned may, in the United States district court for the district in which that person or entity does business or resides, petition for an order modifying or setting aside the summons, or a prohibition of disclosure ordered by a court under paragraph (6). (6)(A) A United State district court for the district in which the summons is or will be served, upon application of the United States, may issue an ex parte order that no person or entity disclose to any other person or entity (other than to an attorney in order to obtain legal advice) the existence of such summons for a period of up to 90 days. (B) Such order may be issued on a showing that the things being sought may be relevant to the investigation and there is reason to believe that such disclosure may result in— (i) endangerment to the life or physical safety of any person; (ii) flight to avoid prosecution; (ii) destruction of or tampering with evidence; or (iv) intimidation ofpotential witnesses. (C) An order under this paragraph may be renewed for additional periods of up to 90 days upon a showing that the circumstances described in subparagraph (B) continue to exist. (7) A summons issued under this section shall not require the production ofanything that would be protected from production under the standard., applicable to a subpoena duces tecum issued by a court of the United States. (8)If no case or proceeding arises from the production of records or other things pursuant to this section within a reasonable time after those records or things are produced, the agency to which those records or things were delivered shall, upon written demand made by the person producing those records or things, return them to that person, except where the production required was only of copies rather than originals. (9) A subpoena issued under paragraph (I XAXi)(I1) or (IXAXii) may require production as soon as possible, but in no event less than 24 hours after service of the subpoena. (10) As soon as practicable following the issuance Ma subpoena under paragraph (IXAXii), the Secretary of the Treasury shall notify the Attorney General of its issuance.'. (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS(I) SECTION HEADING-The heading for section 3486 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking: In Federal health care Investigations'. (2) TABLE OF SECTIONS- The item relating to section 3486 in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 223 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking: in Federal health care investigations'. (3) CONFORMING REPEAL- Section 3486A, and the item relating to that section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 223, of title 18, United States Code, are repealed. (c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT- Section 3486 of title 18, United States Code, is amended — (I) in subsection (aX4), by striking 'summoned' and inserting 'subpoenaed'; and (2) in subsection (d), by striking 'summons' each place it appears and inserting 'subpoena'. EFTA01696639
March 7, 2026 at 5:18 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-3/3 — EFTA01693999.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01693999
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01693996 | EFTA01693999 FEB-25-2008 11!38 P. 03/03 FBI 2nd Session NAL 3048 AN ACT To amend Title 18, United States Code. to provide clearer coverage over threats against former presidents and members of their families. end for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. SEC'S (a) IN GENERAL- Section 3486(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended — (1) so that paragraph (I) reads as follows: (IXA) in any invmligation of— (O(l) a Federal health care offense; or (11) a Federal offense involving the sexual expkitation or abuse of children, the Attorney General; or (Ryan offatse under section 811 or 879, or a threat against a person protected by the United States Scant Service under pa:V*3Pb (5) or (6) of section 3056, if the Director of the Secret Service determines that the threat constituting the offense or the threat against the person protected is imminent. the Secretary of the Treasury. may issue In writing and cause to be saved a subpoena requiring the production and testimony desaibed in subparagraph (B). (B) Except as provided in sobparawsPh (C). a subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) may require (1) the production of any records or other things relevant to the investigation; and (ii) testimony by the custodian of the things required to be produced concerning the production and authenticity of those things. (C) A subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) with respect to a provider ofelectronic communication service or remote computing service, in an inventigatinn tea Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children shell not ostond beyond — (i) requiring that sisuridin Cu disclose the Dame, address, load and long distance telephone toll billing records, telephone number or other subscriber number or Identity, and length ofservice of a subscriber to or customer ofsuch service and the types of servkes the subscriber or CUStOrner utilized, which may be relevant to an authorized law enforcement inquiry; or (ii) requiring a custodian of the records of that provider to give testimony contenting the production and authentication °torch records or Information. ... (0) As UFOS in this paragraph, the term 'Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children' means an offense under section 1201. 2241(e). 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A-2252. 22524.., 2260. 2421, 2422, or 2423. In which the victim is an individual who has not attained the age of 18 years.; (2) in paragraph (3)— (A) by insening 'relating to a Federal health ears offense after *pmduction of records'; and (B) by adding at the end the following: 'The production of things in any other case may be required from any place within the United States or subject to the laws or Jurisdiction of the United States?: and (3) by adding at the end the following: (3) AL my time before the return date specified in the summons. the person or entity summoned may, in the United Skies district court for the district in which that person or entity does business or resides, petition for an order modifying or sating aside the summons, a prohibition or of disclosure ordered by a court under paragraph (6). (6)(A) A United State district court for the district in which the summons is or will be saved, upon application of the United States. may issue an ex parte order that no person or entity disclose to any other person or entity (other than to an attorney in order to obtain legal advice) the existence of such summons for is naiad of up to 90 days (B) Such order may be issued on a showing that the things being sought may he relevant to the investigation and there is reason to believe that such disclosure may result in— (i) endangerment to the life or physical safety ofany person; (ii) flight to avoid prosecution; (iii) destruction of or tampering with evidence; or (iv) intimidation ofpotential witnesses. (C) An order under this paragraph may be renewed for additional periods of up to 90 days upon a showing that the eirewnstances described in subparagraph (8) continue to exist. (7) A summons issued under this ration shall not require the production ofanything that would be protected from production under the standards applicable to a subpoena du= tecum issued by a court of the United States. (8)If no Cat or pr seeding arises from the production ofrecords or other things pursuant to this section within a reasonable time after those records or things ore produced, the agency to which those records or things were delivered shall, upon written demand made by the person producing those records or things, return them to that person. exapt where the production required was only of copies rather than originals. (9) A subpoena issued under paragraph (IXAXi)(11) or (IXAXIi) may require production as son possible, but In no event las than 24 hours after as service of the subpoena. (I0) As soon es practicable following the issuance of a subpoena under paragraph (1)(AXii). the Secretary of the Treasury shall fluffy the Attorney General of its issuance'. (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. ••••.' • • eon • :flan. ”M • • EFTA01693999
March 7, 2026 at 3:09 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-3/3 — EFTA01692593.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01692593
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01692526 | EFTA01692593 DEC-22-200:6 15:S9 FBI WEST Pall BEACH RR Pune Law )44 - min txeigress 2nd Session H.R. 3048 AN ACT P.03 To amend Title IS, United States Code, to provide clearer Ovalle ova threats against former Presidents end members of their families, and for other purposes, Be it enacted by the Sawa andHouse of Representatives of the United States of Amerlea In Congress assembled. SEC 5 (1)1N GISNISRAL- Seaton 3486(a) of title 18, United Slates Code, is amended — (1) so that paragraph (I) reads as follows: b any investigation of— (00)a Pcdund health care offense: or (11) a Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children, the Attorney General; or (ii) an offense under section 871 or 819, or a threat against a pason protected by the United States Secret Service under paragraph (5) or (6) of section 3056, if the Direetoc or the Secret Service determines that the threat constituting the offense or the threat against the person protected is imminent, the Sea Lary of the Treasury, nay issue in writing and cause to be screed a subpoena requiring the production end testimony described In subparagraph (B). (B) Except as provided In subparagraph (C), a subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) may require () the production of any records or other things relevant to the investigation; and (II) testimony by the custodian ofMc things required to be produced concerning the production and authenticity of those things. (C) A subpoena issued under subparagraph (A) with respect to a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service, In en investigation ofa Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children shalt not extend beyond —() requiting that provider to disclose the name, address, local and long distance telephone toll billing records, telephone number or other subscriber number or identity. sad length of service of a subsalber to or customer of such saving and the types of services the subscriber or CuROMer utilized, which may be relevant to an authorised law enforcement inquiry; or (ii) requiring o custodian of the records of that provider to give testimony concerning the production and authentication of such records or information. (D) M used in this paragraph, the tarn 'Federal offense involving the sexual exploitation or abuse of children' means an offense under section 1201, 2241(e), 2242, 2243, 2251, 225IA, 2252. 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423. in which the victim Is an individual who has not attained the age of 18 men.% (2) in Paragraph (3)— (A) by inserting 'relating to a Federal health we offense' after 'production of records': and (B) by adding at the end the following 'The production of things in any elle rya nifty be required from any plate within the United States or subject to the laws or jurisdiction of the United States:: and (3) by adding at the end the folltnUing: • (5) At any time before the return date specified in the somntonsahe person or entity summoned may, in the United States district court lot the district in which that person or entity does business or resides, petition for an order modifying or setting Aide the SUrra.ons, or aprohibition of disclosure ordered by a court undu paragraph (6). (6)(A) A United State district court for the district In which the summons is or will be served, upon application of the UniteCIStates, may issuer= • patio order that no person or entity disclose to any other person or entity (other then to an attorney in order to obtain legal advice) the existence of such SUMMOT1S fora period of up to 90 days. (B) Such order may be issued on a showing that the things being sought may be relevant to the investigation and them Is reason to believe that such disclosure may result in— () endangerment to the life a physical safety of any person: (i) flight to avoid prosecution; (iii) destruction of or tampering with evidence; or (iv) Intimidation ofpotential wimascs. (C) An order under this paragraph may be renewed for additional periods of up to 90 days upon a showing that the circumstances described in subparagraph (B) continue to exist. (7) A summons issued under this section shall not require the production ofanything that would be protected from production under the milt& applicable to a subpoena duces teeurn issued by a court of the United States. (8)If no case or proceeding grim from the production of records or other things pursuant to this section within a reasonable time after those records or things are produced, the agency to which those records or things were delivered shall, upon written demand made by the person producing those records or things, return them to that paean, except where the production required was only of copies rather than originals. (9) A subpoena issued under paragraph (1)(A)(0(1) or (1)(A)(ii) may requite production as soon as possible, but in no event Ices than 24 hours after service of the subpoena. (10) As soon as practicable following the issuance of a subpoena under paragraph (1)(A)00, the Secretary of the Treasury shall notify the Attorney General of ass issuance.'. (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS* (1) SECTION READING- The heading for section 1486 of title IS, United States Code, is averted by striking: 12/22/2006 02:40PM EFTA01692593
March 7, 2026 at 2:00 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-4/4 — EFTA01657068.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01657068
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01657063 | EFTA01657068 726 R. FISHER, E. GE1SELMAN, AND M. AMADOR Because the Cognitive Interview is more complex and encourages more extensive and focused retrieval. we expected it to take longer to conduct than the standard police interview Such differences have been found in previous laboratory studies (Fisher, Geiselman, Raymond, Jurkevich, & Warhaftig, 1987; Geiselman et al., 1985); however, in neither of these two studies was the extra time responsible for the superiority of the Cognitive Interview. In the present study, the interview times were surprisingly similar for the various interviews. The posttrained interviews of the trained detectives (11.47 min) were not reliably longer than their pretrained interviews( l0.65 min) or than those conducted by the untrained detectives (9.05 min). both h's< I, = (1, 6) and (I, II), and Atces = 10.587 and 21.295, respectively. Of the sewn trained detectives, four took more time to conduct posttrained interviews than pretrained interviews, and three took less time. In this study, therefore, the observed superiority of the Cognitive Interview over the standard police interview was not due to differences in interview time. Discussion The overall pattern of data—an increase in the amount of investigatively relevant information accompanied by extremely high corroboration ratcs--provides strong support for the effectiveness of the Cognitive Interview in field investigations. Training in the Cognitive Interview enhanced performance in both the before-after and the between-groups comparisons. Six of the seven detectives improved with training; only the one detective who did not use the technique as intended did not improve. In the between-groups comparison, the two groups of detectives were equivalent before training, as judged by their supervisors and by empirical observations. After training, the trained detectives elicited 63% more information. That the effectiveness of the training was comparable for the before-after and between-groups comparisons suggests that the conclusions are unlikely to be a product ofanything unique to either design. Furthermore, the magnitude of the effect (50%-60% improvement) is reasonably dose to what we would expect on the basis of the previous laboratory findings, in which the revised technique was 45% more effective than the original (Fisher Geiselman. Raymond, Jurkevich, & Warhaftig, 1987), which, in turn, was 25%-35% more effective than standard police interviews (Geiselman et al., 1985; Geiselman, Fisher, Cohen, et al., 1986). The similarity of the corroboration rates associated with the Cognitive Interview and with standard police interviews also mirrors the findings from our laboratory studies, in which aeonracy rates were equivalent. In sum, the Cognitive Interview increased the effectiveness of investigative interviews without any apparent negative consequences. How does the Cognitive Interview compare with other memory-enhancing techniques used by investigative interviewers? Historically, little training has been provided to law-enforcement interviewers to enhance the recollection of cooperative witnesses. Similarly, there is no formal training in memory-enhancement techniques for law students or attorneys to conduct effective interviews with clients, even though the fact-finding stage is often critical to successful legal inquiry (Fisher, 1986). We know of no formal technique other than hypnosis that appears regularly in the training of investigative interviewers, at least for memory-enhancement purposes. How does the Cogni- tive Interview compare with hypnosis? Although we have never directly compared the current version of the Cognitive Interview with hypnosis, Fisher, Geisclman, Raymond, Jurlcevich, and Warhaftig (1987) found that in similar observing conditions across two experiments, the Cognitive Interview elicited 33.4% more correct information than did hypnosis. The Cognitive Interview also is not beset with the problems sometimes found with hypnosis. The Cognitive Interview does not lead to increased error rates and does not render respondents hypersuggestible to leading questions; if anything, it mitigates the effect (Geiselman, Fisher, MacKinnon, et al., 1986). Yuillc and Kim (1987) recently analyzed several police hypnosis interviews and found that interviewers frequently used some components of the Cognitive Interview. Yuille and Kim concluded that "the advantage of hypnosis found in the present study has nothing to do with hypnosis. . . . [Instead) the cognitive interview is the 'active' memory component ofhypnosis" (p. 427). Because the Cognitive Interview has been a reliable technique to enhance recall, yet has none of the negative consequences of hypnosis, it has been suggested as a preferable alternative (Delfenbacher 1988; Orne, as cited in Commonwealth v. Di Nicole', 1985), and one that should be more acceptable by the courts (Yoffie & Kim, 1987). In addition to its technical merit, the Cognitive Interview has considerable practical utility; that is, (a) the technique can be learned within a few hours, (b)it requires little theoretical background or previous training, and (c) it is easily administered. Finally, because the technique is based primarily on proper timing, sequencing, and phrasing of questions, the respondent should not perceive that any special intervention is occurring. As such, eyewitnesses should have no apprehensions about participating in this form of interview. Although the Cognitive Interview is an effective investigative instrument. there are a few limitations. First, its usefulness may vary from one event to another Its primary contribution for police will be in cases such as commercial robbery or battery, in which the bulk of the evidence comes from eyewitness reports, as opposed to crimes that rely more heavily on physical evidence. Second, the Cognitive Interview can be used only with cooperative witnesses. Witnesses who wish to withhold information intentionally will not be "broken" by the Cognitive Interview. Third, although our study found no differences between the time taken to conduct the Cognitive Interview and a standard interview; we expect that the Cognitive Interview takes somewhat longer. It can be used to greatest effect, therefore, when there is ample time to conduct the interview. Finally. the Cognitive Interview requires considerable mental concentration on the part of the interviewer He or she must make more on-line decisions and show greater flexibility than is typically demonstrated in standard police interviews. In that sense, it is probably more difficult to conduct the Cognitive Interview than the standard interview. As with other skills, however, with practice, many of the resource-demanding mental operations required initially will he handled automatically. Because this version of the Cognitive Interview contains several components, we cannot be sure which of the suggested techniques are primarily responsible for its overall effectiveness. Some components may have only marginal value. Others may vary depending on the specific features of the interview, for example, whether the witness is a child or an adult and whether EFTA01657068
March 5, 2026 at 8:41 PM