I recommend the excellent discussion at Michael Plaxon's Substack: Interpretive Methodology: Is Anything Ever Really Settled?. Here is a taste: Yet I believe we have reached a kind of tipping point in Canadian constitutional discourse. No matter what the majority in Taylor said, the idea that alternative constitutional methodologies are inherently implausible or beyond-the-pale or unworthy of attention by constitutional scholars in Canada is simply not a serious intellectual position in 2026.