from boingboing rss feed

West Australian Greens MLC Sophie McNeill has condemned Nationals MP Lachlan Hunter after he was suspended from parliament for four days following alleged disrespectful behaviour. Hunter, the Central Wheatbelt MLA, was cautioned three times during question time and interjected repeatedly during private members' business to raise concerns about a pro-Palestine event held at parliament. The event, organized by Perth Doctors for Palestine and Parliamentary Friends of Palestine, displayed names of 18,000 children killed in Gaza since October 2023. Speaker Stephen Price suspended Hunter for persistently challenging the deputy speaker's authority, citing 'wilful disregard for the institution'. McNeill accused Hunter of hypocrisy, claiming he sought attention rather than addressing genuine issues. Hunter argued the suspension was politically motivated, accusing speakers of bias. Premier Roger Cook emphasized the suspension aimed to restore respect for parliamentary rules, clarifying it was unrelated to the debate content but focused on procedural conduct.

Martin Sellner, a far-right Austrian white nationalist banned from the UK for promoting extremist narratives, has expressed hope of entering Canada to attend a conference in Hamilton organized by the Dominion Society, which advocates for mass immigration deportation. Sellner's ban from the UK in 2019 was due to security concerns, and his U.S. travel permit was revoked after links to the Christchurch mosque shooter were uncovered. Canadian officials have not commented on his potential entry, citing immigration laws. Hamilton Mayor Andrea Horwath has urged businesses to avoid renting venues to the Dominion Society, which promotes 'remigration' and anti-immigration rhetoric. Experts warn that groups like the Dominion Society exploit economic anxieties to advance white nationalist agendas, similar to historical far-right movements. The article highlights tensions between free speech and hate speech, with calls for vigilance against extremist ideologies.

Republican representative Nancy Mace (R-SC) faced sharp criticism from former GOP strategist Steve Schmidt after her recent CNN interview. Mace sparked controversy by suggesting the U.S. should ban Islamic immigration, stating, 'Go back to that country of origin. It doesn't need to be here.' Schmidt condemned her remarks as 'uglier, more bigoted, and more un-American,' comparing her behavior to historical figures like David Duke. He emphasized that Muslims have historically fought for America, citing George Washington's support for religious freedom. Schmidt argued that Mace's comments reflect a 'fetish for cruelty' and 'political posture,' accusing her of dehumanizing fellow Americans. The incident highlights tensions within the GOP over immigration policy and the role of rhetoric in political discourse. Mace's remarks, which overshadowed constitutional discussions on freedom of worship, underscore broader debates about tolerance and national identity in U.S. politics.

Kevin Hassett, director del Consejo Nacional de la Economía, defendió un enfoque positivo hacia un informe de empleo de julio que mostró una pérdida neta de 23,000 empleos. Sin embargo, el Departamento de Trabajo revisó hacia abajo las cifras de mayo y junio en 103,000, lo que elevó la preocupación. El desempleo se mantuvo en un 4.1%, su nivel más bajo desde junio de 2025, pero la pérdida de 264,000 personas en el mercado laboral generó críticas. Hassett argumentó que, al excluir sectores como el fútbol y los empleados gubernamentales, el informe mostraba un aumento de 100,000 empleos, lo que fue ampliamente criticado como manipulación de datos. Usuarios en redes sociales y expertos destacaron la falta de rigor en su análisis, comparando su enfoque con prácticas engañosas. La controversia refleja desconfianza en la transparencia de las políticas económicas y la importancia de datos precisos en la toma de decisiones públicas.

Politicians from the Coalition and independent factions have increasingly called for the removal of a proposed statue commemorating former Victorian Premier Dan Andrews, sparking debate over its appropriateness. The controversy stems from Andrews' tenure as premier, marked by policies related to pandemic management and public health measures. Critics argue the statue would serve as an enduring symbol of divisive governance, while supporters view it as a tribute to his leadership during challenging times. The discussion has gained traction in political circles, with calls for the project to be reconsidered amid growing public sentiment. Media outlets have reported that the debate reflects broader tensions around commemoration and accountability in public life. While no formal decision has been made, the controversy highlights how symbolic gestures can become focal points for political discourse. The situation also underscores the role of media in amplifying such debates, as coverage of the issue has intensified in recent weeks.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has revealed his intentions to work with federal agencies to enforce the Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, aiming to permanently restrict abortion access across all states. During a private conference call with religious leaders, Blanche stated that the Department of Justice is collaborating with health agencies to ensure the ruling becomes 'permanent in every state.' He emphasized efforts to prevent physicians in abortion-permitting states from prescribing mail-order abortion drugs to patients in restricted states, claiming such actions would undermine states' rights to protect life from conception. Critics, including Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, condemned Blanche's remarks as indicative of a 'zealot' seeking to strip reproductive rights, while the Center for Reproductive Rights condemned his plans to 'gut reproductive healthcare access.' The call, recorded by the religious group Intercessors for America, included instructions for journalists to hang up, raising concerns about transparency. Blanche's nomination faced scrutiny after Trump initially considered withdrawing it due to controversies over a proposed anti-weaponization fund, which critics argued would benefit political allies. Despite these challenges, his nomination advanced with a party-line vote, highlighting the polarized political landscape surrounding abortion rights and federal-state power dynamics.

Graham Platner, the Democratic candidate for Maine's U.S. Senate seat, has suspended his campaign following allegations of sexual assault that have led to the withdrawal of endorsements. The candidate, who had until July 13 to remain on the ballot, claimed the accusations are politically motivated and part of a broader effort by the 'political establishment' to undermine his candidacy. In an 11-minute video statement, Platner denied the allegations, asserting they are 'false' and part of a coordinated attack. The controversy comes after he won the Democratic primary against Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), but the allegations have already damaged his campaign. Critics argue the timing of the accusations, which emerged just weeks before the July 13 deadline to remove his name from the ballot, suggests a strategic move to derail his bid. Platner's campaign has called for transparency, urging supporters to understand the 'timeline' of events and the 'reason' behind the allegations. The incident highlights the intense scrutiny faced by political candidates, particularly in close races where personal conduct can significantly impact electoral outcomes.

FBI Director Kash Patel responded vehemently to a critical op-ed by MS NOW’s Hayes Brown, who accused him of indulging in a 'lavish lifestyle' funded by taxpayers. The critique highlighted Patel's alleged use of FBI resources for personal leisure, including trips to Italy, Hawaii, and Nashville, as well as his association with luxury items like a gold-plated jet ski. Patel dismissed the criticism on social media, accusing Brown of lying and emphasizing his duty to protect Americans. Analysts suggest Patel’s lifestyle could make him a political target for Republicans seeking to criticize figures close to Trump. The controversy underscores ongoing scrutiny of high-ranking officials’ personal expenditures and their potential impact on public trust in government institutions.