An evaluation committee reviewed 19 proposals for RFP 2062, applying four scoring criteria and agreeing consensus scores and rankings. Blue Heron Consulting scored highest; the county asked proposers to monitor the procurement portal for next steps.

Proposal for Filsera app meets most requirements but lacks complete references and disaster recovery plan.

Staff presented a draft RFP and streamlined real‑estate agreement to put county lots in Progress Point on the market. Commissioners debated offering all lots at once versus phased marketing, avoiding single‑developer lockups, creating a review committee, and requiring development milestones in agreements.

DPH said complete proposals must be submitted by Aug. 31, 2026 at 4 p.m.; evaluation weights include scope of services 40%, work plan 25%, and organization profile 15%, among other categories.

The committee edited a draft RFP for an investment advisory contract, agreeing to require electronic submissions, to ask for historical one- and three-year analyses, and to propose a 3-year initial contract term with renewal options and termination-for-convenience language.

TDOT described who is ineligible (PMC/HNTB), conflict‑of‑interest rules under TDOT policy 101.05, prequalification requirements, page limits (Section E: 10 pages; Section F: 5 projects; total: 40 pages), evaluation weights (25% team, 15% technical approach, 20% presentation), and presentation logistics (5 people, 30‑minute presentation + 15‑minute Q&A).

Reviewer identifies shortcomings in policy development and intake processes for housing proposals.

Committee scores Balance Partners, Johnston and Stewart, and Pittman Law Group on proposals.

Rating reflects local team's availability issues with one member at 50 percent capacity.