#RRFS
RadarScope 5.7 is available today for iOS with support for ProbSevere, RRFS, indie radars, and

One more thing…
September 21, 2026 at 3:58 PM
Making decisions
April 26, 2025 at 2:38 AM
A new interactive REFS (RRFS Ensemble Forecast System) viewer is coming to an SPC site near you. Probably sometime in early 2026.
August 13, 2025 at 11:44 PM
Forecasters, please check your Halloween candy this year. I just found RRFS output in this Snickers bar
October 31, 2024 at 2:26 AM
There's a reason why I don't take the RRFS seriously, and you shouldn't either.
March 10, 2026 at 2:23 PM
PSA 🧵

Religion Research Friends don't let other religion research friends (RRFs) explain what they really do for a living to strangers on a plane

RRFs confirm a very bland back story w/ each other that they use like some form of temporarily induced witness protection ID to & from a conference
When the stranger next to you on the plane asks what you do for work, and you make the mistake of telling them the truth. #SBLAAR24
November 21, 2024 at 4:23 PM
I think the RRFS is about to be very wrong in about 15 minutes
April 14, 2026 at 6:47 PM
Forecasters, please check your Halloween candy this year. I just found RRFS output in this Snickers bar
October 31, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Tidal levels appear to be coming in a bit lower than forecast on this evening's cycle but concerned that could change for Sun am, particularly from northern NJ up into southern New England where winds should increase again later tonight and have more onshore component in some areas.
September 27, 2026 at 12:00 AM
This would kill all weather model development - RRFS, HAFS, and WoFS - in NOAA. These are activities that the private sector can’t support; they leverage these models to train & benchmark their own.

I wish the headline didn’t just focus on climate as it limits the audience who will listen.
BREAKING from @science.org: The Trump admin is seeking to kill nearly all climate research at NOAA, its climate science agency.

Its near-final budget proposal would end all NOAA research labs, academic institutes, and regional climate centers. And it wants to fully end the NOAA Research division.
Trump seeks to end climate research at premier U.S. climate agency
White House aims to end NOAA’s research office; NASA also targeted
www.science.org
April 11, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Surprise, surprise...more forecast model disagreement! European & RRFS models showing vastly more rain for the Puget Sound area than others (0.5-1" vs 0.1-0.25"). Consensus for heavy rain on the WA Coast and over some wildfires in the Cascades. #wawx
September 25, 2026 at 2:21 AM
Replacing the NAM and HREF with the RRFS in early 2026 is a really bad idea IMHO. The RRFS does not handle low-level cold air masses nearly as well as the NAM and a couple other HREF members, although they can be too aggressive with low-level cold air.
June 26, 2025 at 10:47 PM
So this area of rain in Houston kind of came out of nowhere? No signal on HRRR, minimal useful signal on RRFS. The hell?
May 19, 2026 at 11:17 AM
HRRR? RRFS? Those models don’t exist without NOAA’s Global Systems Lab.

The physics used in even more models? Not possible without us.

Decision-support tools like DESI and IDSS Engine used throughout the NWS? Also us.

What my lab does is *integral* to weather prediction and keeping people safe.
April 17, 2025 at 1:32 AM
just, uh, not while FV3 is the RRFS core 🫣
April 14, 2026 at 5:41 PM
"Fun" forecast model disagreement tonight...Last 2 European model runs keep 40-50 mph gusts for the Seattle area, while the hi-res HRRR and RRFS models keep strongest winds south of Olympia, w/40-50 mph for Portland, 50-60 mph for OR & S. WA Coast. Stay tuned. #wawx #orwx
September 25, 2026 at 1:53 AM
As someone who regularly forecasts severe weather, I can confidently state that decommissioning the NAM and HREF in favor of the RRFS (even though the NAM and HREF are admittedly old) is by no means an upgrade.
Noem: "Frankly, the National Weather Service under President Trump has been working to put in a new system bc it has been neglected for years. It's an ancient system that needed to be upgraded, so President Trump recognized that right away and got to work... but that installation is not complete"
July 7, 2025 at 11:22 PM
I don't know enough about this to dispute it
April 27, 2025 at 1:08 PM
Strongly disagree with this move. The RRFS is not ready for prime time. The NAM has value in corners of the universe. The HREF is a phenomenal model. This is not smart IMO.
May 12, 2026 at 10:07 PM
Is the RRFS the NAM’s Cat6 Katrina it’s always simulating?
June 26, 2025 at 11:58 PM
#31SLS
Inbound. Pitching some HMT work on RRFS precip verification from the flash flood experiment.
October 20, 2024 at 9:11 PM
Hot take: the RRFS is actually pretty good (even better than HRRR in some regards) for most everything but severe convection! And for that, at least deterministically, we have our developmental real-time MPAS forecasts that help demonstrate the physics + DA advances from RRFS v1 development.
May 12, 2026 at 10:07 PM
RRFS A is whats going in. mpas should be the core for v2
May 22, 2026 at 12:56 AM
Friends don't let friends storm chase based only on the RRFS (I posted this here as well, but the search function here is terrible, so a Twitter screenshot it is).
April 28, 2025 at 1:12 AM
So just to be clear. When using Pivotal and opting to use the RRFS, should I be looking at the RRFS A or the GSL MPAS version? I want the closest thing to whatever is getting forced on us in September.
May 22, 2026 at 12:53 AM