The "export defer" TC39 proposal aims to introduce a similar optimization *at the language level*, so that you can rely on it in all the tools and environments that you might run your code with.
Just because you need one thing from a module, you shouldn't pay the cost of all the others!
Just because you need one thing from a module, you shouldn't pay the cost of all the others!
February 12, 2026 at 3:45 PM
The "export defer" TC39 proposal aims to introduce a similar optimization *at the language level*, so that you can rely on it in all the tools and environments that you might run your code with.
Just because you need one thing from a module, you shouldn't pay the cost of all the others!
Just because you need one thing from a module, you shouldn't pay the cost of all the others!
Rspack v1.5 will introduce an experimental optimization that skips building unused reexports in side-effect-free barrel files.
This reduces the build time of `import { Button } from 'antd'` from 528ms to 82ms.
This reduces the build time of `import { Button } from 'antd'` from 528ms to 82ms.
August 1, 2025 at 10:07 AM
Rspack v1.5 will introduce an experimental optimization that skips building unused reexports in side-effect-free barrel files.
This reduces the build time of `import { Button } from 'antd'` from 528ms to 82ms.
This reduces the build time of `import { Button } from 'antd'` from 528ms to 82ms.
It has been surprisingly hard to find decent data on eighteenth-century sugar reexports, except for Great Britain. I made some heroic assumptions, so this chart is not fit for publishing, but if it is even in the correct ballpark, it shows how French reexports really were something else entirely.
February 24, 2026 at 8:48 PM
It has been surprisingly hard to find decent data on eighteenth-century sugar reexports, except for Great Britain. I made some heroic assumptions, so this chart is not fit for publishing, but if it is even in the correct ballpark, it shows how French reexports really were something else entirely.
met someone who imports them from China and illegally reexports to the US, lucrative business
July 4, 2026 at 3:47 PM
met someone who imports them from China and illegally reexports to the US, lucrative business
it reexports (==) as `phys_equal` and restricts (=) and `compare` to ints
January 9, 2025 at 7:50 PM
it reexports (==) as `phys_equal` and restricts (=) and `compare` to ints
u could always do a metapackage that reexports from all the constituent ones
February 24, 2026 at 9:46 AM
u could always do a metapackage that reexports from all the constituent ones
did you know that rust has support for parameterized modules, just like ocaml: github.com/rust-lang/ru...
You can pass generic arguments to a module path segment if the module reexports an enum variant · Issue #154962 · rust-lang/rust
What the-. enum Enum<T> { Variant, Carry(T) } mod module { pub(super) use super::Enum::Variant; } fn scope() { let _ = module::<i32>::Variant; // OK! 😨 let _ = self::module::<()>::Variant {}; // OK...
github.com
April 9, 2026 at 11:00 AM
did you know that rust has support for parameterized modules, just like ocaml: github.com/rust-lang/ru...
Auf Deutschlands Drängen wurde eine Maßnahme zur Verhinderung von Sanktionsumgehungen durch Tochterfirmen aus EU-Staaten abgeschwächt, welche zum vertraglichen Verbot des Reexports ihrer Waren nach russland verpflichtet hätte./Ma
June 24, 2024 at 9:03 AM
Auf Deutschlands Drängen wurde eine Maßnahme zur Verhinderung von Sanktionsumgehungen durch Tochterfirmen aus EU-Staaten abgeschwächt, welche zum vertraglichen Verbot des Reexports ihrer Waren nach russland verpflichtet hätte./Ma
Ha! I was thinking more reexports to the continent.
November 27, 2024 at 5:17 PM
Ha! I was thinking more reexports to the continent.
loook wat super cool amazig optize preqest droped !
tangled.org/coil-habdle....
tangled.org/coil-habdle....
January 12, 2026 at 3:49 PM
loook wat super cool amazig optize preqest droped !
tangled.org/coil-habdle....
tangled.org/coil-habdle....
Another WIP
less than 1.5 minutes, a few clicks and i have a Substance Painter file with my mesh, textures exported, everything set up in UE and (mostly) ready for further iterations and reexports🙌
still MANY issues, but happy to see that my idea is coming to life
less than 1.5 minutes, a few clicks and i have a Substance Painter file with my mesh, textures exported, everything set up in UE and (mostly) ready for further iterations and reexports🙌
still MANY issues, but happy to see that my idea is coming to life
January 3, 2026 at 6:16 PM
Another WIP
less than 1.5 minutes, a few clicks and i have a Substance Painter file with my mesh, textures exported, everything set up in UE and (mostly) ready for further iterations and reexports🙌
still MANY issues, but happy to see that my idea is coming to life
less than 1.5 minutes, a few clicks and i have a Substance Painter file with my mesh, textures exported, everything set up in UE and (mostly) ready for further iterations and reexports🙌
still MANY issues, but happy to see that my idea is coming to life
Je pourrait faire un fil sur ces choses, mais je pense que @mariefernet.bsky.social est mieux placée pour expliquer tout ça.
L'information importante est que c'est un outil utilisé par les US pour bloquer les exports/réexports de matériels militaires.
L'information importante est que c'est un outil utilisé par les US pour bloquer les exports/réexports de matériels militaires.
February 28, 2025 at 10:45 PM
Je pourrait faire un fil sur ces choses, mais je pense que @mariefernet.bsky.social est mieux placée pour expliquer tout ça.
L'information importante est que c'est un outil utilisé par les US pour bloquer les exports/réexports de matériels militaires.
L'information importante est que c'est un outil utilisé par les US pour bloquer les exports/réexports de matériels militaires.
are they actual star reexports or just namespace reexports? namespace reexports aren't as annoying to deal with
March 5, 2025 at 4:13 AM
are they actual star reexports or just namespace reexports? namespace reexports aren't as annoying to deal with
Two bugfixes on rustdoc nightly features were merged:
* doc_cfg feature: `cfg` on glob reexports are now correctly handled: github.com/rust-lang/ru...
* macro expansion: Foreign items are now correctly expanded: github.com/rust-lang/ru...
1/2
* doc_cfg feature: `cfg` on glob reexports are now correctly handled: github.com/rust-lang/ru...
* macro expansion: Foreign items are now correctly expanded: github.com/rust-lang/ru...
1/2
rustdoc: correctly propagate cfgs for glob reexports by lcian · Pull Request #157039 · rust-lang/rust
View all comments
This fixes some cases of rustdoc not surfacing the correct required feature combination when using #[cfg(feature = ...)] in combination with glob reexports.
See the example cases...
github.com
May 30, 2026 at 9:18 PM
Two bugfixes on rustdoc nightly features were merged:
* doc_cfg feature: `cfg` on glob reexports are now correctly handled: github.com/rust-lang/ru...
* macro expansion: Foreign items are now correctly expanded: github.com/rust-lang/ru...
1/2
* doc_cfg feature: `cfg` on glob reexports are now correctly handled: github.com/rust-lang/ru...
* macro expansion: Foreign items are now correctly expanded: github.com/rust-lang/ru...
1/2
This doesn’t seem fanciful to me at all tbh: 40% of our total consumption is local production, and some think like 10-15% is in each of power generation and exports. Our actual dependence on the globa lng market is small, maybe 5-8% of use after accounting for our reexports of lng via pipeline.
March 16, 2026 at 8:36 AM
This doesn’t seem fanciful to me at all tbh: 40% of our total consumption is local production, and some think like 10-15% is in each of power generation and exports. Our actual dependence on the globa lng market is small, maybe 5-8% of use after accounting for our reexports of lng via pipeline.
I like inline module blocks for imports/reexports and keeping more descriptive names, instead of having mod․rs files, I hate having a hundred mod․rs files in my project
April 28, 2026 at 8:48 PM
I like inline module blocks for imports/reexports and keeping more descriptive names, instead of having mod․rs files, I hate having a hundred mod․rs files in my project
With Iran unlikely to continue receiving weapon reexports through the UAE, rerouting through Pakistan and the Caspian Sea, and more direct sourcing from China are the most likely substitutes. This shift creates rare policy openings to disrupt the new routes.
Read: https://bit.ly/4eDxZd3
Read: https://bit.ly/4eDxZd3
June 26, 2026 at 9:00 PM
With Iran unlikely to continue receiving weapon reexports through the UAE, rerouting through Pakistan and the Caspian Sea, and more direct sourcing from China are the most likely substitutes. This shift creates rare policy openings to disrupt the new routes.
Read: https://bit.ly/4eDxZd3
Read: https://bit.ly/4eDxZd3
I usually see public reexports at the lib.rs level, with the inner module structure largely hidden. Also note judicious use of non_exhaustive on public structs for api stability
January 15, 2025 at 5:44 PM
I usually see public reexports at the lib.rs level, with the inner module structure largely hidden. Also note judicious use of non_exhaustive on public structs for api stability
The (incomplete) pic i get from the data is: Direct Imports from China way down, China exports to rest of world up, Port of LA traffic only moderately down. So it's reexports.
June 3, 2025 at 8:37 PM
The (incomplete) pic i get from the data is: Direct Imports from China way down, China exports to rest of world up, Port of LA traffic only moderately down. So it's reexports.
Why? Kazakhstan is still a strong supporter of russia, undermining the EU sanctions with reexports. Unless Kazakhstan is clearly and strongly cutting ties with russia, there is no reason to give such privilege.
December 5, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Why? Kazakhstan is still a strong supporter of russia, undermining the EU sanctions with reexports. Unless Kazakhstan is clearly and strongly cutting ties with russia, there is no reason to give such privilege.
Fixed one of the oldest rustdoc reexport bug (5 years!) where transient crates were ignored:
```
// crate a
/// a
pub struct X;
// crate b
/// b
pub use a::X
// crate c
/// c
pub use b::X;
```
Before github.com/rust-lang/ru..., the docs from the `b` crate was not present.
Enjoy!
```
// crate a
/// a
pub struct X;
// crate b
/// b
pub use a::X
// crate c
/// c
pub use b::X;
```
Before github.com/rust-lang/ru..., the docs from the `b` crate was not present.
Enjoy!
[rustc_resolve] Correctly keep all reexports in `ModChild::reexport_chain` by GuillaumeGomez · Pull Request #162543 · rust-lang/rust
View all comments
Fixes #81893.
First commit comes from #161872 and it's the base I used for the fix in the second commit (which also reverts basically everything from the first commit, not su...
github.com
September 17, 2026 at 8:59 AM
Fixed one of the oldest rustdoc reexport bug (5 years!) where transient crates were ignored:
```
// crate a
/// a
pub struct X;
// crate b
/// b
pub use a::X
// crate c
/// c
pub use b::X;
```
Before github.com/rust-lang/ru..., the docs from the `b` crate was not present.
Enjoy!
```
// crate a
/// a
pub struct X;
// crate b
/// b
pub use a::X
// crate c
/// c
pub use b::X;
```
Before github.com/rust-lang/ru..., the docs from the `b` crate was not present.
Enjoy!
I also added a few improvements to the tool: It reexports all at once, and I finally got to automate a lot of smaller things in decompression I was lazy about for the longest time.😅
Including this automated precise decompression window with no stray garbage tiles around the gfx!
Including this automated precise decompression window with no stray garbage tiles around the gfx!
April 11, 2025 at 3:43 PM
I also added a few improvements to the tool: It reexports all at once, and I finally got to automate a lot of smaller things in decompression I was lazy about for the longest time.😅
Including this automated precise decompression window with no stray garbage tiles around the gfx!
Including this automated precise decompression window with no stray garbage tiles around the gfx!
I think I wasn’t clear enough about what I wanted. I would like to see function names of reexports on the index, linking to the reexports site. This seems to be working when I list one of the reexports in the pkgdown yaml. At least it worked for me here www.nflfastr.com/reference/in...
October 16, 2025 at 7:00 PM
I think I wasn’t clear enough about what I wanted. I would like to see function names of reexports on the index, linking to the reexports site. This seems to be working when I list one of the reexports in the pkgdown yaml. At least it worked for me here www.nflfastr.com/reference/in...