issuing a retraction, to my earlier statement made only to myself in the privacy of my own home: "fuck, this edible was, in point of fact, shit"
November 8, 2026 at 4:56 AM
issuing a retraction, to my earlier statement made only to myself in the privacy of my own home: "fuck, this edible was, in point of fact, shit"
By the time you figure out this was all a lie, you’ll have moved on and will never print a correction or retraction
The US president has offered to work with Democrats on an amnesty deal for migrants in a sign that he could temper his deportation campaign in the wake of Republicans’ midterm rout. ft.trib.al/jnq0brs
November 9, 2026 at 2:25 PM
By the time you figure out this was all a lie, you’ll have moved on and will never print a correction or retraction
A while back, I was looking at Neocities as a personal site option, but held off because I found that the guy was rather dismissive of concerns regarding a/i in favor of a cool new toy
Well, apparently his blog post has since been updated with a full retraction:
kyledrake.com/writings/ai
Well, apparently his blog post has since been updated with a full retraction:
kyledrake.com/writings/ai
A Retraction
kyledrake.com
November 8, 2026 at 3:48 AM
A while back, I was looking at Neocities as a personal site option, but held off because I found that the guy was rather dismissive of concerns regarding a/i in favor of a cool new toy
Well, apparently his blog post has since been updated with a full retraction:
kyledrake.com/writings/ai
Well, apparently his blog post has since been updated with a full retraction:
kyledrake.com/writings/ai
I'm refreshing the news every 15 minutes to see whether they'll issue a retraction or double down.
November 7, 2026 at 10:32 PM
I'm refreshing the news every 15 minutes to see whether they'll issue a retraction or double down.
Are they gonna publish a retraction or nah?
"For a lot of progressives, Stevens hasn’t done enough. No matter how many times she says she’s supporting El-Sayed, progressives are sure that, in her heart of hearts, she doesn’t really mean it. She doesn’t truly love El-Sayed. To which I say: Grow up."
Stop Whining. Just Win.
Republicans are babies. Some progressives are, too.
lnk.thebulwark.com
November 1, 2026 at 7:31 PM
Are they gonna publish a retraction or nah?
I keep waiting on them to either issue a retraction or double down.
November 7, 2026 at 9:47 PM
I keep waiting on them to either issue a retraction or double down.
No reality adjacent person would believe for one moment that El Sayed would give his acceptance speech in Arabic. Not for a moment. This requires more than retraction, it requires an explanation.
November 7, 2026 at 4:48 PM
No reality adjacent person would believe for one moment that El Sayed would give his acceptance speech in Arabic. Not for a moment. This requires more than retraction, it requires an explanation.
A year after plagiarism allegations and author’s retraction request, Elsevier is still investigating.
A year after plagiarism allegations and author’s retraction request, Elsevier is still investigating
At a glance, the papers look completely different: One, published in 2023, describes forest co-management in Bangladesh. The other, published last year, is about soil conservation in China. But an …
retractionwatch.com
November 9, 2026 at 7:48 PM
A year after plagiarism allegations and author’s retraction request, Elsevier is still investigating.
I'm so tired of this shit. They KNOW the MAGA base believes the first thing they see and no follow up. Zero. So a retraction later means zero.
November 7, 2026 at 1:33 AM
I'm so tired of this shit. They KNOW the MAGA base believes the first thing they see and no follow up. Zero. So a retraction later means zero.
Well shukran for the apology/retraction anyway.
November 6, 2026 at 10:57 PM
Well shukran for the apology/retraction anyway.
The Democrats need their first veto from POTUS to be a retraction of this bill.
November 7, 2026 at 6:48 AM
The Democrats need their first veto from POTUS to be a retraction of this bill.
He's beyond redemption. There is no retraction or apology that will ever be enough for his gaslighting.
November 8, 2026 at 10:45 PM
He's beyond redemption. There is no retraction or apology that will ever be enough for his gaslighting.
Ingrown toenails:
"Dear Sir,
We demand a retraction of your unfair and frankly cruel comparison . . . ."
"Dear Sir,
We demand a retraction of your unfair and frankly cruel comparison . . . ."
November 6, 2026 at 12:39 AM
Ingrown toenails:
"Dear Sir,
We demand a retraction of your unfair and frankly cruel comparison . . . ."
"Dear Sir,
We demand a retraction of your unfair and frankly cruel comparison . . . ."
Don't forget the Lancet, which published a study by some quack with a dozen mice in his basement as if it were a peer reviewed university study. Despite the later retraction it's still quoted today.
November 8, 2026 at 7:09 PM
Don't forget the Lancet, which published a study by some quack with a dozen mice in his basement as if it were a peer reviewed university study. Despite the later retraction it's still quoted today.
I suspect the smart ones felt testicular retraction and some considerable sphincter twitching.
So none of them, then
So none of them, then
November 6, 2026 at 7:27 AM
I suspect the smart ones felt testicular retraction and some considerable sphincter twitching.
So none of them, then
So none of them, then
One of the world’s top professional societies for scientists and engineers has retracted 1,417 conference papers in one go
go.nature.com/4iye6WE
go.nature.com/4iye6WE
Record-breaking retraction: scholarly publisher pulls 1,400 conference papers on one day
Nature - Announcement by IEEE follows publication of a study showing the retracted papers are linked to paper mills.
go.nature.com
November 7, 2026 at 10:49 AM
One of the world’s top professional societies for scientists and engineers has retracted 1,417 conference papers in one go
go.nature.com/4iye6WE
go.nature.com/4iye6WE
I count this as a formal retraction of the bullshit AEW article and accept them saying they were wrong.
Salon.com's team had an amazing election night. It is truly so fun, such an honor, to work with such smart, passionate, deeply funny people.
This morning, we were informed the publication was closed, effective immediately.
Here's the official company message.
www.salon.com/2026/11/05/g...
This morning, we were informed the publication was closed, effective immediately.
Here's the official company message.
www.salon.com/2026/11/05/g...
Goodbye from Salon - Salon.com
It has been an extraordinary privilege.
www.salon.com
November 6, 2026 at 1:52 AM
I count this as a formal retraction of the bullshit AEW article and accept them saying they were wrong.
No they don’t.
They did that intentionally.
Nobody reads the retraction and they know it.
Easier to beg for forgiveness, once the damage is done, rather than ask for permission prior.
F them.
They did that intentionally.
Nobody reads the retraction and they know it.
Easier to beg for forgiveness, once the damage is done, rather than ask for permission prior.
F them.
November 6, 2026 at 11:12 PM
No they don’t.
They did that intentionally.
Nobody reads the retraction and they know it.
Easier to beg for forgiveness, once the damage is done, rather than ask for permission prior.
F them.
They did that intentionally.
Nobody reads the retraction and they know it.
Easier to beg for forgiveness, once the damage is done, rather than ask for permission prior.
F them.
We're going to kick off Woke II with The Free Press issuing a never-before-seen retraction.
It's me, the politics knower, who thinks a senator-elect would give an acceptance speech entirely in Arabic
can confirm that there was a period in 2024 and 2025 when every wannabe Media Big Shot was obsessed with The Free Press as some kind of model and standard
November 7, 2026 at 4:22 PM
We're going to kick off Woke II with The Free Press issuing a never-before-seen retraction.
Academic fraud is widespread
In a record-breaking retraction, a scholarly publisher pulled 1,400 conference papers in one day
Many were from "paper mills" that sell authorship to the highest bidder. Prices for authorship ranged from $43 to $400 for a 1st-author
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
In a record-breaking retraction, a scholarly publisher pulled 1,400 conference papers in one day
Many were from "paper mills" that sell authorship to the highest bidder. Prices for authorship ranged from $43 to $400 for a 1st-author
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
November 7, 2026 at 7:22 PM
Academic fraud is widespread
In a record-breaking retraction, a scholarly publisher pulled 1,400 conference papers in one day
Many were from "paper mills" that sell authorship to the highest bidder. Prices for authorship ranged from $43 to $400 for a 1st-author
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
In a record-breaking retraction, a scholarly publisher pulled 1,400 conference papers in one day
Many were from "paper mills" that sell authorship to the highest bidder. Prices for authorship ranged from $43 to $400 for a 1st-author
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
The page 3 story retraction of posts.
November 6, 2026 at 9:37 PM
The page 3 story retraction of posts.
Do NOT defame chihuahuas! Mimi (the blonde) demands a retraction! 😂
November 7, 2026 at 10:08 PM
Do NOT defame chihuahuas! Mimi (the blonde) demands a retraction! 😂
Finally! Almost two years after we alerted the journal, Springer has retracted and removed this article based on illegal and unethical research on young trans people in Norway.
The authors didn’t even care to reply.
The authors didn’t even care to reply.
Retraction Note: Population-adjusted numbers, demographics and mental health among children and adolescents referred to the Norwegian National Center for Gender Incongruence over two decades - Europea...
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry -
link.springer.com
November 6, 2026 at 5:21 PM
Finally! Almost two years after we alerted the journal, Springer has retracted and removed this article based on illegal and unethical research on young trans people in Norway.
The authors didn’t even care to reply.
The authors didn’t even care to reply.
This is completely untrue. Most cava and prosecco is trash unless you spend big. Seeking a retraction in the next FT.
November 8, 2026 at 12:44 PM
This is completely untrue. Most cava and prosecco is trash unless you spend big. Seeking a retraction in the next FT.
The only surprise is this propaganda organization attempting a retraction.
November 7, 2026 at 7:23 AM
The only surprise is this propaganda organization attempting a retraction.