The next Dem administration needs to subpoena Sulz
Can we circle back to the part where the NY Times never disclosed that they have incriminating information on Donald Trump from sent by Epstein that's been sitting on their email servers for nearly a decade?
Stuff like this makes me wonder why there hasn't been any reporting about Trump having affairs during his presidencies
November 12, 2025 at 10:08 PM
The next Dem administration needs to subpoena Sulz
Sulz is in the tank for Trump because Sulz is a racist
Update: Apparently, the journalist (Gold) had included this in the original article, but the NYT Editors pulled it out. This was apparently a senior editorial decision, raising a lot more questions about what is going on at the TImes.
October 20, 2024 at 1:08 PM
Sulz is in the tank for Trump because Sulz is a racist
Sulz will be crying for days
Terrible take from the NYT: “Orban’s defeat is a setback for the global nationalist revival promoted by President Trump.”
Is that what we’re calling Fascism these days? (Also, it started with Putin.)
Is that what we’re calling Fascism these days? (Also, it started with Putin.)
April 12, 2026 at 9:40 PM
Sulz will be crying for days
Mags is talking about Sulz
June 25, 2025 at 2:41 AM
Mags is talking about Sulz
no matter how much you despise Sulz and his paper, you don't actually despise them enough
This is quite a hed/subhed.
1) Start with Vance. Use strong action verb. Accept the autocratic premise that the “Marines’ Might” are Vance’s to flex.
2) Mention the protest second and absurdly describe them as in the thousands
3) Treat Trump’s strong man use of the military as a partisan scuffle.
1) Start with Vance. Use strong action verb. Accept the autocratic premise that the “Marines’ Might” are Vance’s to flex.
2) Mention the protest second and absurdly describe them as in the thousands
3) Treat Trump’s strong man use of the military as a partisan scuffle.
October 19, 2025 at 12:14 PM
no matter how much you despise Sulz and his paper, you don't actually despise them enough
We should bring back public stockades just for Sulz
April 3, 2025 at 2:04 PM
We should bring back public stockades just for Sulz
Sulz can eat shit, we're with the tech guild here
NYT publisher AG Sulzberger tells the newsroom that he expects the @nytguildtech.bsky.social strike to continue through the election.
Sulzberger: "It is troubling that the Tech Guild would try to block this public service at such a consequential moment for our country." (via Max Tani, Semafor)
Sulzberger: "It is troubling that the Tech Guild would try to block this public service at such a consequential moment for our country." (via Max Tani, Semafor)
November 4, 2024 at 7:31 PM
Sulz can eat shit, we're with the tech guild here
I need Congessional Dems to depose Sulz under oath
This is a combination of “the NYT leadership like Trump and wish him to rule over us like a king” and “the NYT finds the Epstein scandal vulgar and what it says about the rich, power and sex distasteful”
NYT top story declares Epstein scandal already over and Trump victorious. Base more united even.
Evidence: Steve Bannon, Laura Loomer, and JD Vance said so. And Elon Musk said he doesn’t like the WSJ. Not exactly neutral parties.
It’s an editorial choice. Try to make it go away, not perpetuate it.
Evidence: Steve Bannon, Laura Loomer, and JD Vance said so. And Elon Musk said he doesn’t like the WSJ. Not exactly neutral parties.
It’s an editorial choice. Try to make it go away, not perpetuate it.
July 21, 2025 at 12:57 PM
I need Congessional Dems to depose Sulz under oath
Sulz likes the racism
NYT either will not or cannot speak honestly about what JD Vance is doing on the campaign trail
September 19, 2024 at 11:18 AM
Sulz likes the racism
sulz probably has a letter in the book too
WHY IS THE TIMES TRYING TO KILL THE EPSTEIN STORY??? WHAT DO THEY HAVE TO HIDE???
NYT top story declares Epstein scandal already over and Trump victorious. Base more united even.
Evidence: Steve Bannon, Laura Loomer, and JD Vance said so. And Elon Musk said he doesn’t like the WSJ. Not exactly neutral parties.
It’s an editorial choice. Try to make it go away, not perpetuate it.
Evidence: Steve Bannon, Laura Loomer, and JD Vance said so. And Elon Musk said he doesn’t like the WSJ. Not exactly neutral parties.
It’s an editorial choice. Try to make it go away, not perpetuate it.
July 21, 2025 at 2:50 PM
sulz probably has a letter in the book too
Wie kann man bloß einen Stadtteil Sülz nennen? Und wo wohnst du so? In Aspik!
December 17, 2024 at 11:11 AM
Wie kann man bloß einen Stadtteil Sülz nennen? Und wo wohnst du so? In Aspik!
Sulz is a racist it's official now
July 19, 2024 at 7:09 PM
Sulz is a racist it's official now
Yes I do think Sulz has his own number in case youre wondering
July 4, 2025 at 1:52 PM
Yes I do think Sulz has his own number in case youre wondering
It's incredible how basically everything the NYT has done all year makes perfect sense if you just apply the assumptions that Sulz wants Trump to win and Sulz is a racist.
October 20, 2024 at 1:09 PM
It's incredible how basically everything the NYT has done all year makes perfect sense if you just apply the assumptions that Sulz wants Trump to win and Sulz is a racist.
genuinely of the belief that if actual rule of law is ever restored, Sulz should be put on trial
the federal government is being disemboweled and you’d never know it.
February 4, 2025 at 1:38 PM
genuinely of the belief that if actual rule of law is ever restored, Sulz should be put on trial
Sulz is a racist that's why
so glad we're still platforming the lie completely unchallenged in the headline
great work
great work
August 1, 2024 at 12:05 AM
Sulz is a racist that's why
Sulz is back to panic mode
Why does this piece feel less like "reporting on something that's happening" than the New York Times politics desk collaboratively brainstorming with conservatives on the best attacks to run and amplify on Harris? www.nytimes.com/2024/07/29/u...
Why the Kamala Harris of Four Years Ago Could Haunt Her in 2024
She ran to the left as progressive ideas dominated the last competitive Democratic primary. Now, in a tough general election, Republicans are digging up her old stances.
www.nytimes.com
July 29, 2024 at 8:38 PM
Sulz is back to panic mode
But Sulz does and he owns it so
not everyone at the NYTimes wants Trump to win. I've said before I think it's like a dozen total people. But there's a pattern to what gets prominent placement, above the fold coverage, push notifications, social media posts to drive REPEATED ATTENTION and it's pro-Trump.
October 23, 2024 at 2:26 PM
But Sulz does and he owns it so
there are student blogs covering college football with a more rigorous journalistic standard than the NYT under Sulz
personally I think the New York Times’ chief legal correspondent should know that the court was not a 6-3 conservative majority during Trump’s first term
February 21, 2026 at 5:54 PM
there are student blogs covering college football with a more rigorous journalistic standard than the NYT under Sulz
Sulz is on his sauce again
August 7, 2024 at 12:11 AM
Sulz is on his sauce again
sulz: we're so close, lads
July 22, 2024 at 5:17 AM
sulz: we're so close, lads
sulz is now making me actively think about why he's so strident about nobody needing to care about what's in the files, it's starting to feel personal somehow
If I was the New York Times, I would've spotlighted that Donald Trump lied about Pam Bondi telling him he was in the files. They decided to go another way, though
July 23, 2025 at 11:52 PM
sulz is now making me actively think about why he's so strident about nobody needing to care about what's in the files, it's starting to feel personal somehow
The Sulzberger mentioned here might be this Sulz or it might be the dad, but either way, the conduct of the NYT is starting to make a lot more sense now
November 13, 2025 at 11:14 AM
The Sulzberger mentioned here might be this Sulz or it might be the dad, but either way, the conduct of the NYT is starting to make a lot more sense now
edit: apparently sulz denies this, which raises serious questions about his cognitive ability.
July 7, 2024 at 6:38 PM
edit: apparently sulz denies this, which raises serious questions about his cognitive ability.