#SCOTUS👇@nyt
I was quoted in the NYT saying that the DOJ Dobbs leak investigation would violate separation of powers absent a basis for thinking a crime was committed. Leaking SCOTUS opinions violates Court norms but isn't a crime. Lying to investigators is, though, so maybe there's something here. Details 👇
Does the Dobbs Leak Investigation Violate Separation of Powers?
Last week, The New York Times reported that the Department of Justice is aggressively investigating the 2022 leak of the Dobbs opinion, wit...
www.dorfonlaw.org
November 9, 2026 at 12:55 PM
👇Bush Family Network “owns” The Roberts6 #SCOTUS👇@nyt could feature this if they wanted to be ethical and meet the moment
Somehow not everyone is aware of fact alluded to below. So one more time:

John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett were all on GWBush 2000 'Florida Recount' team.

(Which made GWB first prez in 112 yrs to 'win' after losing popular vote. Now they 'impartially' rule on our future.)
Let me see if I've got this right. The team of lawyers who stole an election in Florida, and gave W the presidency, are now the Scotus team at the center of the GOP theft of our democracy.
October 1, 2026 at 9:34 PM
👇🇺🇸"'Facts matter': Supreme Court justices called out by NYT over 'dangerous Trump' agenda" #SCOTUS
#TrumpAgenda #NYTimes
'Facts matter': Supreme Court justices called out by NYT over 'dangerous Trump' agenda
With a series of critical cases still to be heard, the six conservative justices seated on the Supreme Court were admonished by the New York Times editorial board that they need to listen to one of th...
www.rawstory.com
December 6, 2025 at 3:49 PM
The NYT got the receipts. The Supreme Court's secret docket has handed Trump 80% of his emergency requests in under a year. No arguments. No explanation. That's a court doing politics in the dark.

My Sunday Substack goes deeper. 👇

open.substack.com/pub/mitchthe...

#SCOTUS #ShadowDocket
April 19, 2026 at 3:24 PM
🚨👇 As SCOTUS relies on an "originalism" facade to upend decades-old rulings; this is a new and compelling "originalist" expert's dissent regarding the executive branch's powers.

NYT gift article.
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/13/u...
Originalist ‘Bombshell’ Complicates Case on Trump’s Power to Fire Officials
www.nytimes.com
October 13, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Here's the Top 10 Trending Words over the Past 10 Minutes (weighted by past usage):
️⚠️💨2 - independence
️⚠️💨2 - 4th
️⚠️💨1 - july
️⚠️💨1 - fourth
️⚠️💨1 - ラップ
️⚠️💨1 - fireworks
️⚠️💨1 - celebrating
8th - voted
9th - schoof
10th - neil
(tap/click to see all posts with that word!)

#йобанарусня 🇺🇦
July 4, 2024 at 2:30 PM
Which SCOTUS justice did NYT single out for “rebuke” today @nameshiv.bsky.social ?

“making herself heard”

👇
bsky.app/profile/medi...
The @nytimes.com Healy-Ryan Mamdani ethnicity story is important + illustrates NYT biases.

Today NYT runs a piece that is an affront to Justice Brown Jackson, American democracy and the rule-of-law.

“makes herself heard”

Has anyone at NYT noticed any issues or problems w/SCOTUS lately?

1/n
July 5, 2025 at 8:56 PM