The monster of SCOTUS's creation.
November 2, 2026 at 11:02 PM
The monster of SCOTUS's creation.
SCOTUS's ruling came just hours after Desperate Don begged the court to set aside 20,000 mail-in ballots he had ZERO EVIDENCE were fraudulent.
Trump won't stop trying to rig the election, and we won't stop fighting until the USA rides The Great #BlueWaveInOneDay to victory!
Trump won't stop trying to rig the election, and we won't stop fighting until the USA rides The Great #BlueWaveInOneDay to victory!
November 3, 2026 at 1:40 AM
SCOTUS's ruling came just hours after Desperate Don begged the court to set aside 20,000 mail-in ballots he had ZERO EVIDENCE were fraudulent.
Trump won't stop trying to rig the election, and we won't stop fighting until the USA rides The Great #BlueWaveInOneDay to victory!
Trump won't stop trying to rig the election, and we won't stop fighting until the USA rides The Great #BlueWaveInOneDay to victory!
Some people seem to be assuming that this observation is directed towards the justices. It isn’t! It’s directed to people who don’t follow the shadow docket and therefore might not already know the extent of SCOTUS’s culpability
The Supreme Court had the opportunity to stop third-country removals, and it refused. Whatever happens to these people will be on the majority’s head.
October 31, 2026 at 1:54 AM
Some people seem to be assuming that this observation is directed towards the justices. It isn’t! It’s directed to people who don’t follow the shadow docket and therefore might not already know the extent of SCOTUS’s culpability
Looking forward to SCOTUS’s new Single-Sullivan Principle, to be discovered by Sam Alito after inhaling fumes from a crack on Mount Vernon
October 30, 2026 at 8:54 PM
Looking forward to SCOTUS’s new Single-Sullivan Principle, to be discovered by Sam Alito after inhaling fumes from a crack on Mount Vernon
1926: SCOTUS's Euclid v. Ambler ruling let cities zone entire neighborhoods for single-family homes only. Result: ~75% of LA's residential land is zoned exclusively for single-family houses today. That's not a housing shortage. It's a housing ban, written into law.
#UrbanPlanning #Housing #Zoning
#UrbanPlanning #Housing #Zoning
November 2, 2026 at 6:30 PM
1926: SCOTUS's Euclid v. Ambler ruling let cities zone entire neighborhoods for single-family homes only. Result: ~75% of LA's residential land is zoned exclusively for single-family houses today. That's not a housing shortage. It's a housing ban, written into law.
#UrbanPlanning #Housing #Zoning
#UrbanPlanning #Housing #Zoning
It's particularly interesting because, as Eric points out, expedited removals are at odds with SCOTUS's arch-formalist separation of powers doctrine. Yet, that inconsistency is beneficial to the GOP's immigration policy.
November 3, 2026 at 4:47 PM
It's particularly interesting because, as Eric points out, expedited removals are at odds with SCOTUS's arch-formalist separation of powers doctrine. Yet, that inconsistency is beneficial to the GOP's immigration policy.
The Constitution says nothing about presidential immunity & that's how it should be. One task ahead of us is undoing SCOTUS's Trump v. USA ruling. youtu.be/ZQcYdta28Bc
The 28th Amendment
YouTube video by Law & Society
youtu.be
October 30, 2026 at 5:33 PM
The Constitution says nothing about presidential immunity & that's how it should be. One task ahead of us is undoing SCOTUS's Trump v. USA ruling. youtu.be/ZQcYdta28Bc
At oral argument in one of the cases Essayli said election officials might have aiding/abetting liability for anyone who violates 611.
That's a hell of a theory, and runs counter to SCOTUS's recent limiting of aiding and abetting liability.
In other words, this is not a reasonable investigation.
That's a hell of a theory, and runs counter to SCOTUS's recent limiting of aiding and abetting liability.
In other words, this is not a reasonable investigation.
November 3, 2026 at 5:13 AM
At oral argument in one of the cases Essayli said election officials might have aiding/abetting liability for anyone who violates 611.
That's a hell of a theory, and runs counter to SCOTUS's recent limiting of aiding and abetting liability.
In other words, this is not a reasonable investigation.
That's a hell of a theory, and runs counter to SCOTUS's recent limiting of aiding and abetting liability.
In other words, this is not a reasonable investigation.
Number one is SCOTUS's lawless immunity ruling that enabled all the others.
October 27, 2026 at 2:35 PM
Number one is SCOTUS's lawless immunity ruling that enabled all the others.
I was finishing my first year of practice in Phoenix. I knew people who knew O'Connor. Hard to say whether I was more disillusioned by SCOTUS's naked lawlessness, or by discovering that my Republican colleagues were dishonorable to the last.
October 29, 2026 at 3:04 PM
I was finishing my first year of practice in Phoenix. I knew people who knew O'Connor. Hard to say whether I was more disillusioned by SCOTUS's naked lawlessness, or by discovering that my Republican colleagues were dishonorable to the last.
Thank goodness this didn't have merit, even by SCOTUS's currently low standards.
Democracy teetering on the freaking brink. It's so crazy.
www.nytimes.com/2026/11/02/u...
Democracy teetering on the freaking brink. It's so crazy.
www.nytimes.com/2026/11/02/u...
Supreme Court Rejects Trump Administration Request to Intervene in California Ballot Case (Gift Article)
The court’s ruling came just hours after administration lawyers asked the justices to immediately order California to set aside 20,000 mail-in ballots.
www.nytimes.com
November 2, 2026 at 11:48 PM
Thank goodness this didn't have merit, even by SCOTUS's currently low standards.
Democracy teetering on the freaking brink. It's so crazy.
www.nytimes.com/2026/11/02/u...
Democracy teetering on the freaking brink. It's so crazy.
www.nytimes.com/2026/11/02/u...
That's not how any of that works. CU is out of SCOTUS's hands now. Only a Constitutional Amendment gets rid of it. SCOTUS has already decided and they don't re-adjudicate rulings they've already made because they've been shamed into it.
Please take a civics class. This is getting tiresome.
Please take a civics class. This is getting tiresome.
November 2, 2026 at 8:23 PM
That's not how any of that works. CU is out of SCOTUS's hands now. Only a Constitutional Amendment gets rid of it. SCOTUS has already decided and they don't re-adjudicate rulings they've already made because they've been shamed into it.
Please take a civics class. This is getting tiresome.
Please take a civics class. This is getting tiresome.
This is why the Times’ exposure of SCOTUS’s secret Clean Power memos is so telling. Roberts is always claiming in public to police the boundary between Articles I & II. But in private, he’s most angry that Article I didn’t give Article III a veto. It’s always about their own power, always.
November 2, 2026 at 6:32 PM
This is why the Times’ exposure of SCOTUS’s secret Clean Power memos is so telling. Roberts is always claiming in public to police the boundary between Articles I & II. But in private, he’s most angry that Article I didn’t give Article III a veto. It’s always about their own power, always.
The real problem is there is too much money being spent in politics thanks to SCOTUS's bone-headed Citizens United decision. Take away the funding and all this garbage will slow to a trickle.
November 3, 2026 at 7:51 PM
The real problem is there is too much money being spent in politics thanks to SCOTUS's bone-headed Citizens United decision. Take away the funding and all this garbage will slow to a trickle.
Telling a reporter that he expects a person seeking a pardon to donate to his library is smoking gun evidence of public corruption that easily satisfies even SCOTUS’s ridiculously elevated standards.
November 1, 2026 at 4:17 PM
Telling a reporter that he expects a person seeking a pardon to donate to his library is smoking gun evidence of public corruption that easily satisfies even SCOTUS’s ridiculously elevated standards.
Do they see the law? Or do they see the handwriting on the wall that subservience to Trump will lead to a swift end to this current SCOTUS’s composition?
Given no dissents, my money is on the latter.
Given no dissents, my money is on the latter.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court just dealt Trump a major election-eve defeat, swiftly rejecting his regime's attempt to force California to set aside ballots allegedly cast by noncitizens. The justices didn't even ask California to respond. No dissents.
Supreme Court Swiftly Rejects Trump's Last-Ditch California Election Gambit
The Supreme Court dealt the Trump regime a stunning election-eve defeat Monday, swiftly rejecting its emergency effort to force California to set aside ballots
meidasnews.com
November 2, 2026 at 11:59 PM
Do they see the law? Or do they see the handwriting on the wall that subservience to Trump will lead to a swift end to this current SCOTUS’s composition?
Given no dissents, my money is on the latter.
Given no dissents, my money is on the latter.
If Congress changes hands, expect potential battles over executive power, presidential vetoes, federal spending, and congressional oversight. Add SCOTUS's presidential immunity ruling, and the stakes for institutional accountability become even greater.
Vote 🗳 #Midterms2026
Vote 🗳 #Midterms2026
November 3, 2026 at 3:28 AM
If Congress changes hands, expect potential battles over executive power, presidential vetoes, federal spending, and congressional oversight. Add SCOTUS's presidential immunity ruling, and the stakes for institutional accountability become even greater.
Vote 🗳 #Midterms2026
Vote 🗳 #Midterms2026
(many people get upset with SCOTUS’s rulings but like….this is the exact logic they employ when scrutinizing 14th amendment and other equal rights amendments so they are not as ahistorical as ppl think but the streets are not ready for that conversation)
November 2, 2026 at 2:30 PM
(many people get upset with SCOTUS’s rulings but like….this is the exact logic they employ when scrutinizing 14th amendment and other equal rights amendments so they are not as ahistorical as ppl think but the streets are not ready for that conversation)
Ugh, now he's saying that California would have "aiding and abetting liability" if they knowingly counted votes by non-citizens, which (a) is inapplicable and (b) does not correspond with how a&a liability works, and he should read SCOTUS's Taamneh and Cox v. Sony decisions (written by Thomas!)
Essayli says this is the list "we believe most strongly in."
October 27, 2026 at 10:00 PM
Ugh, now he's saying that California would have "aiding and abetting liability" if they knowingly counted votes by non-citizens, which (a) is inapplicable and (b) does not correspond with how a&a liability works, and he should read SCOTUS's Taamneh and Cox v. Sony decisions (written by Thomas!)
John Roberts is going to lose.
All he will have accomplished is to awaken a sleeping giant.
www.lwv.org/blog/scotuss...
All he will have accomplished is to awaken a sleeping giant.
www.lwv.org/blog/scotuss...
SCOTUS's Final Blow Dismantling the Voting Rights Act | League of Women Voters
On April 29, the Court issued its opinion in Louisiana v. Callais. In a 6-3 ruling, the Court weakened Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), which prohibits any voting rule or procedure that discr...
www.lwv.org
November 3, 2026 at 11:46 PM
John Roberts is going to lose.
All he will have accomplished is to awaken a sleeping giant.
www.lwv.org/blog/scotuss...
All he will have accomplished is to awaken a sleeping giant.
www.lwv.org/blog/scotuss...
I feel like it’s Christmas Eve 🎄and I’ll be getting the gift I’ve been wishing and praying for: A BLUE WAVE 🌊 which will homefully return democracy to us;give teeth in the Congress; and hold Felon 47 (barring SCOTUS’s get out of jail free card) and his incompetent administration accountable!
Vote Blue: Bluewave Political Message
Alt: Vote Blue: Bluewave Political Message
static.klipy.com
November 3, 2026 at 3:00 PM
I feel like it’s Christmas Eve 🎄and I’ll be getting the gift I’ve been wishing and praying for: A BLUE WAVE 🌊 which will homefully return democracy to us;give teeth in the Congress; and hold Felon 47 (barring SCOTUS’s get out of jail free card) and his incompetent administration accountable!
Why do people think the outcome of Garland charging trump earlier would have changed what Judge Cannon would have done?
The only thing that would have happened is she would have freed him earlier, and SCOTUS's immunity ruling would have been moved up a year or two.
The only thing that would have happened is she would have freed him earlier, and SCOTUS's immunity ruling would have been moved up a year or two.
October 28, 2026 at 2:09 AM
Why do people think the outcome of Garland charging trump earlier would have changed what Judge Cannon would have done?
The only thing that would have happened is she would have freed him earlier, and SCOTUS's immunity ruling would have been moved up a year or two.
The only thing that would have happened is she would have freed him earlier, and SCOTUS's immunity ruling would have been moved up a year or two.
youtube.com/watch?v=4iO3...
Justice Elena Kagan is sounding an alarm about SCOTUS's impact on democracy & voting rights. Michael Popok & Lisa Graves connect her reported remarks to the Roberts Court’s record on the Voting Rights Act, Shelby County, and the fight over congressional maps.
Justice Elena Kagan is sounding an alarm about SCOTUS's impact on democracy & voting rights. Michael Popok & Lisa Graves connect her reported remarks to the Roberts Court’s record on the Voting Rights Act, Shelby County, and the fight over congressional maps.
Justice Kagan SHREDS Roberts Court ahead of Elections...
YouTube video by Legal AF
youtube.com
November 1, 2026 at 4:54 AM
youtube.com/watch?v=4iO3...
Justice Elena Kagan is sounding an alarm about SCOTUS's impact on democracy & voting rights. Michael Popok & Lisa Graves connect her reported remarks to the Roberts Court’s record on the Voting Rights Act, Shelby County, and the fight over congressional maps.
Justice Elena Kagan is sounding an alarm about SCOTUS's impact on democracy & voting rights. Michael Popok & Lisa Graves connect her reported remarks to the Roberts Court’s record on the Voting Rights Act, Shelby County, and the fight over congressional maps.