4,573 likes, 267 comments - seastersjones on October 26, 2026: "Come get your “antizionist” mayor who refused to replace his billionaire zio cop commissioner. Perhaps you should speak on this, @nycmay...

YouTube video by US Open Tennis Championships

Spissen Joshualyn Reeves garanterte på forhånd seier og scoret da Rosenborgs fotballkvinner slo ukrainske SeaSters Odesa 3-0 i kvalifiseringen til europacupen.

Rosenborg er klare for andre kvalifiseringsrunde til Europa Cup for kvinner. Trønderne tapte 1–0 i den første kampen i Moldova, og slet også før pause mot ukrainske Seasters Odesa i returkampen på Koteng arena i Trondheim onsdag kveld. Tre minutter ut i andre skulle det løsne. Irene Dirdal er av Uefa foreløpig kreditert scoringen som på TV-reprisene minnet mest om et selvmål. Men mål er mål, mål preger fotballkamper, Rosenborg kjørte på og til slutt sto det 3–0 i kampen og 3–1 sammenlagt. Joshualyn Reeves scoret det andre målet etter 77 minutter, mens innbytter Celine Nergård sørget for det tredje fire minutter før full tid,

Some people today are discouraging others from learning programming on the grounds AI will automate it. This advice will be seen as some of the worst career advice ever given. I disagree with the Turing Award and Nobel prize winner who wrote, “It is far more likely that the programming occupation will become extinct [...] than that it will become all-powerful. More and more, computers will program themselves.”​ Statements discouraging people from learning to code are harmful! In the 1960s, when programming moved from punchcards (where a programmer had to laboriously make holes in physical cards to write code character by character) to keyboards with terminals, programming became easier. And that made it a better time than before to begin programming. Yet it was in this era that Nobel laureate Herb Simon wrote the words quoted in the first paragraph. Today’s arguments not to learn to code continue to echo his comment. As coding becomes easier, more people should code, not fewer! Over the past few decades, as programming has moved from assembly language to higher-level languages like C, from desktop to cloud, from raw text editors to IDEs to AI assisted coding where sometimes one barely even looks at the generated code (which some coders recently started to call vibe coding), it is getting easier with each step. I wrote previously that I see tech-savvy people coordinating AI tools to move toward being 10x professionals — individuals who have 10 times the impact of the average person in their field. I am increasingly convinced that the best way for many people to accomplish this is not to be just consumers of AI applications, but to learn enough coding to use AI-assisted coding tools effectively. One question I’m asked most often is what someone should do who is worried about job displacement by AI. My answer is: Learn about AI and take control of it, because one of the most important skills in the future will be the ability to tell a computer exactly what you want, so it can do that for you. Coding (or getting AI to code for you) is a great way to do that. When I was working on the course Generative AI for Everyone and needed to generate AI artwork for the background images, I worked with a collaborator who had studied art history and knew the language of art. He prompted Midjourney with terminology based on the historical style, palette, artist inspiration and so on — using the language of art — to get the result he wanted. I didn’t know this language, and my paltry attempts at prompting could not deliver as effective a result. Similarly, people who understand the language of software through their knowledge of coding can tell an LLM or an AI-enabled IDE what they want much more precisely, and get much better results. This is the best time yet to learn to code, to learn the language of software, and learn to make computers do exactly what you want them to do. [Original text: https://lnkd.in/gRkJ3GYe ] | 1,052 comments on LinkedIn