85% of researchers find it unproblematic to have generative AI write literature reviews. Primary goals:
✅save time
✅increase output
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
#chatgpt #AI #ScientificKnowledge
#ShitGoals or #NecessaryGoals?🧪🎓👩🔬
✅save time
✅increase output
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
#chatgpt #AI #ScientificKnowledge
#ShitGoals or #NecessaryGoals?🧪🎓👩🔬
Is ChatGPT making scientists hyper-productive? The highs and lows of using AI
Large language models are transforming scientific writing and publishing. But the productivity boost that these tools bring could have a downside.
www.nature.com
May 14, 2025 at 12:53 PM
85% of researchers find it unproblematic to have generative AI write literature reviews. Primary goals:
✅save time
✅increase output
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
#chatgpt #AI #ScientificKnowledge
#ShitGoals or #NecessaryGoals?🧪🎓👩🔬
✅save time
✅increase output
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
#chatgpt #AI #ScientificKnowledge
#ShitGoals or #NecessaryGoals?🧪🎓👩🔬