#SuperInjunction
Thrilled to be nominated for Scoop of the Year at the British Journalism Awards for the Afghan data leak story and superinjunction. Testament to the fantastic team @newsagents.bsky.social and @globalplayer.com.
Two governments took The News Agents to secret court for two years via a constitutionally unprecedented superinjunction to stop you from hearing this story.

The MoD is responsible for a data leak that put up to 100,000 Afghans at risk of death.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zdc6...
The secret court that silenced the News Agents...until now
YouTube video by The News Agents
www.youtube.com
October 23, 2025 at 1:15 PM
The data breach occurred under Boris Johnson. The superinjunction was put in place under Rishi Sunak, who then kept it in place via the Court of Appeal in 2024. Labour ordered a review then lifted the injunction.
Conclusion: it's all Labour’s fault.
July 16, 2025 at 9:04 AM
Inquiry after SAS identities leaked in new breach

Defence secretary left ‘furious’ at failure, days after Afghan superinjunction exposed

www.thetimes.com/uk/defence/a...
Inquiry after SAS identities leaked in new breach
Defence secretary left ‘furious’ at failure, days after Afghan superinjunction exposed
www.thetimes.com
July 20, 2025 at 6:58 AM
He needs to go and lie down after this superinjunction.
July 16, 2025 at 7:02 PM
Private Eye podcast recently said there is no superinjunction. I tend to believe them on their track record.
January 1, 2025 at 1:24 PM
And on the substance of the superinjunction, it’d still be in place were it not for the joint work of so many of my colleagues from across the press. The most important thing is that no govt should ever be able to abuse the courts like it again.
December 12, 2025 at 11:00 AM
There is a lot of deflection taking place by politicians this morning, suggesting that the court kept the superinjunction in place and that had to be overcome.

That's not true or not complete- the government kept it in place by repeatedly applying for its renewal.
July 16, 2025 at 8:36 AM
Was really great to talk to @pimlicat.bsky.social & @sturdyalex.bsky.social about all matters Trump yesterday - and to hear their analysis of the Afghan names leak & superinjunction.
July 17, 2025 at 9:16 AM
Superinjunction, I heard. 🤷‍♀️
May 13, 2026 at 2:14 PM
Would you like to know how you can be sure the whole superinjunction thing is a smear?

The whole point of a superinjunction is that a journalist would be in contempt by merely mentioning it exists. People like Wootton or Oakeshott know this. So, their story is a provable lie, right out of the trap.
September 30, 2024 at 10:28 PM
Please do not move, a Superinjunction Enforcer has been dispatched to your location
January 9, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Two governments took The News Agents to secret court for two years via a constitutionally unprecedented superinjunction to stop you from hearing this story.

The MoD is responsible for a data leak that put up to 100,000 Afghans at risk of death.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zdc6...
The secret court that silenced the News Agents...until now
YouTube video by The News Agents
www.youtube.com
July 15, 2025 at 11:28 AM
There is a lot of ill-informed commentary out there suggesting that the Afghan leak superinjunction is a story about transparency vs safety.

That is not true, or at least it is not the full picture.

Thread below.
July 17, 2025 at 1:19 PM
neil gaiman is from the land of the superinjunction. this is what you try to do.
The entire idea of an NDA to prevent the world from learning you've done terrible things is in and of itself an ethical hellhole, but trying to punish an abuse victim over it like this is beyond loathsome.

I just cannot with this dude. This fucking fuck. Christ.
Neil Gaiman Seeks $500,000 From Accuser Caroline Wallner
The author says Wallner broke her NDA by sharing her story with the media, including with New York Magazine.
www.vulture.com
May 17, 2026 at 9:28 PM
He is right though, couldn't happen in Britain. A couple of phonecalls to the right posh boys and the evidence would mysteriously vanish and a superinjunction would be in place that afternoon.
September 11, 2025 at 7:20 AM
Surely that’s covered by a superinjunction?
June 22, 2026 at 9:11 PM
So the fact that outlets *have* reported on Neil Gaiman and haven’t received a takedown notice means that there’s no UK superinjunction in place, barring all reportage.

So what’s io9’s excuse at this point? Or BleedingCool? Boing Boing? Or for that matter, the Guardian? The New York Times?
July 30, 2024 at 5:18 AM
If you don’t believe that the media is biased in favour of the right. Today will surely convince you otherwise?

#superinjunction
July 16, 2025 at 6:34 PM
A superinjunction kept the data breach secret amid fears it could lead to a Taliban ‘hit list’.
How did the UK leak information about thousands of Afghans?
A superinjunction kept the data breach secret amid fears it could lead to a Taliban ‘hit list’.
bit.ly
July 17, 2025 at 8:00 AM
July 17, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Defence Secretary John Healey addressing Parliament about this story RIGHT NOW

"This superinjunction is...unprecedented"

Parliament has been denied its right to scrutinise the leak, the up to £7bn spent and policy decisions for two years.
Two governments took The News Agents to secret court for two years via a constitutionally unprecedented superinjunction to stop you from hearing this story.

The MoD is responsible for a data leak that put up to 100,000 Afghans at risk of death.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zdc6...
The secret court that silenced the News Agents...until now
YouTube video by The News Agents
www.youtube.com
July 15, 2025 at 11:42 AM
I guess this is how americans are going to find out about the British injunction and superinjunction system
February 19, 2026 at 12:12 PM
@scotnational.bsky.social as you’re a Scottish paper & not subject to English & Welsh law & I suspect that Morgan McSweeney & his wife Imogen Walker MP have a superinjunction in place I was wondering if you might investigate them & answer a few questions that , as a constituent …
August 8, 2025 at 2:21 PM
The Defence Secretary has made a statement to the Commons today, following the lifting of the superinjunction about a data breach relating to Afghans who helped UK personnel and the secret resettlement scheme the Tory Government carried out.

He calls the superinjunction "unprecedented".

1/11
Oral Statement on Afghan data breach
Statement on a significant data protection breach from February 2022, relating to the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy.
www.gov.uk
July 15, 2025 at 3:34 PM
But there are still questions about why it took so long, why he has closed the resettlement schemes at the moment of maximum danger and how it can be that Rimmer can dismiss the entire basis for the superinjunction hitherto. How did the MoD get it so wrong?
July 16, 2025 at 9:15 AM