#TCCHS
LightNews LightNews
walbnews10.bsky.social
The friends and family of 17-year-old Deontavis Cooper are sharing heartfelt memories after he was killed in a crash on the same night he graduated from Thomas County Central High School. >> https://www.walb.com/2026/05/26/tcchs-graduate-killed-crash-remembered-contagious-smile-kindness/ 
Image 1
May 27, 2026 at 3:30 PM
walbnews10.bsky.social
This is a unique opportunity to train with TCCHS legend and football standout Austin Bryant.
TCCHS legend Austin Bryant to host youth football camp
Thomas County Central High School will host Austin Bryant’s Youth Football Camp on July 12, 2025, at The Jackets’ Nest.
www.walb.com
July 4, 2025 at 4:00 PM
dapecorts.bsky.social
youtu.be/vBKw3-tCCHs?...
Willkommen
YouTube video by Release - Topic
youtu.be
December 30, 2025 at 7:19 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA01091989.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta01091989
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA01091933 | EFTA01091989 May 2012] SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION LAWS 1127 Where loss of reputation is alleged, litigation centers on whether the stigmatizing statements produce an additional state-imposed burden? Courts following Paul have narrowly interpreted this requirement, thus rejecting stigma-plus challenges where there was insufficient proof of an additional burden. Consequently, claims have been dismissed involving loss of goodwill;" termination of at-will employment;"" removal from a bankruptcy panel;"' a prohibition against adopting a child, which resulted from the defamation;"' and where a "name-clearing hearing" was later held!' Against this backdrop of jurisprudence, registrants find themselves battling two fronts —trying to overcome the Court's reluctance to expand the notion of what constitutes a protected liberty interest, and addressing conflicting case law on the proof required for the "plus" in the stigmaplus test!" But Justice Rehnquist, writing for the majority in Paul in 976, may have foreshadowed this modem procedural due process challenge when he recalled Justice Stewart's words from Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy: "Mt is to be noted that this is not a case where government action has operated to bestow a badge of disloyalty or infamy, with an attendant foreclosure from other employment opportunity."' Forty years later, super-registration schemes have created just the kind of infamy accompanied by loss of a tangible right to which both Justice Rehnquist and Justice Stewart referred. The discussion of procedural due process safeguards in the context of community notification received short shrift in Connecticut Department of 388. See, e.g.. Doe V. Dcp't of Pub. Safety ex lei. Lee. 271 F.3d 38.55 (2d Cir. 200z) (observing that the "plus" required "must at least entail some non-trivial state involvement"). rev'd sub nom. Conn. Dcp't of Pub. Safety v. Doe. 538 U.S. 1 (2003): Mosric v. Barry. p8 F.2d x151. 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (asking whether the appellant was deprived of "some other interest that rises to constitutional status"). 389. Sadallah v. City of Utica. 383 F.3d 34. 38-39 (2d Cir. 2004): see WMX Tcchs.. Inc. v. Miller. 197 F.3d 367.374-376 (9th Cir. '999). 390. Silva V. Worden. 130 F.3d 26.32 (1st Cir. z997). 391. Shaltry V. United States. No. 95-t5340. Eggs WL 866862. at •5 (9th Cir. June 26. z 995). 392- Behrens v. Regier. 422 F.3d 1255. 1260-61 WI Cir. 2005) (holding that because the plaintiff had no recognized right under state law to adopt a child. being erroneously labeled a "verified child abuser" did not deprive him of a liberty interest). 393- Patterson v. City of Utica. 370 F.3d 322. 328 (2cl Cir. 2004) (concluding that. although the name-clearing hearing in this case did not satisfy procedural due process. when properly conducted such a hearing bars substantive due process claim). 394. Some case law has suggested that the "plus" must be a protected property interest. See, e.g.. Clark v. Twp. of Falls. 890 F.2d 6, z. 62o (3d Cir. 1989) (concluding that, because the plaintiff had no properly interest in retaining his duties as a police lieutenant. there was no "alteration or extinguishment of any right or interest"). Other case law has indicated that less than a property interest would qualify. See. e.g., Doc v. US. Dcp't of Justice. 753 F.2d 1092. [zoo (D.C. Gr. 1985) (explaining that "loss of government employment or a foreclosure of future government employment opportunities" might suffice to meet the stigma-plus test). 3%. Paul v. Davis. 424 U.S. 693.705 (1976) (quoting Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy. 367 U.S. 886 09619- EFTA01091989 Epstein Web iOS app on the App Store.
May 9, 2026 at 4:44 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
EFTA02236349.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta02236349
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA02236349 | EFTA02236349 To: From: Sent: ' S d: Wed 1/24/2018 3:20:00 PM Alert - Call simon from Thermadore, techs have identified part, it is part of entire assembly January 24, 2018 10.10 AM • Call simon from Thermadorc, tcchs have identified part, it is part of entire assembly EFTA_R1_00999417 EFTA02236349
April 2, 2026 at 1:21 AM
anastas2002.bsky.social
His father, Charlie Ward Sr, was my social studies teacher in high school. He was also called Coach Ward. #FAMU #Tallahassee #ThomasvilleGA #ThomasCounty #TCCHS
November 9, 2025 at 8:01 PM