Naturally, Republicans running for Congress should campaign on President Donald Trump’s promise to pay adult Americans $5,000 if the GOP wins the midterm elections

KAAL is hosting the Minnesota CD-1 debate between incumbent Rep. Brad Finstad and challenger Jake Johnson on October 13, and we want your input on what questions should be asked during this debate.

via NBC News Top Stories — In today’s edition, Jonathan Allen digs into President Donald Trump’s latest promise to voters.

via BBC News — The US president has said every American will get $5,000 (£3,700) if the Republican Party wins November's midterms.

On March 4, 2026, President Donald Trump hosted representatives from major tech companies including Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, xAI, Google/Alphabet, Oracle, and Amazon at the White House to sign a voluntary, nonbinding pledge aimed at shielding consumers from potential increases in electricity bills due to the massive energy demands of AI data centers. Trump emphasized that data centers need better public relations and claimed the agreement would ensure tech firms cover their own power needs—potentially even building onsite power plants—to prevent higher utility costs for Americans and possibly lower them in some communities. This move addresses growing bipartisan concerns and voter backlash, as polls show low support for nearby data centers, and states like Georgia have seen legislative efforts (some stalled by utility opposition) to shift costs away from ratepayers. However, electricity experts, including Ari Peskoe from Harvard Law School, dismiss the pledge as mostly theatrical PR with little real power, since the White House lacks direct authority over utility rates—control lies with state regulators, Congress, and utilities whose business models often spread costs across all customers. Contracts remain private, enforcement is absent, and even committed companies face limits in offsetting grid-wide pressures from aging infrastructure and surging demand. While the pledge acknowledges the issue publicly—a positive shift per some analysts—meaningful protections would require legislative action, such as proposed bipartisan Senate bills (unlikely to pass soon). Smaller operators may struggle to match these promises, highlighting the pledge's limited scope despite the involvement of deep-pocketed firms.