@aleph1.underground.org are you who i think you are? aka do you know me?

×静オケが弱い
○お前が職員を育てすぎてもうALEPH1匹ごとき大した脅威じゃない

正直ALEPH1匹脱走した程度じゃリスクレベル2どころか1のBGMも鳴らないことあるくらいなもんで、リスクレベル2初めて聞いたときは「うわやっちまった……」感がすごかった
それくらい終末鳥はやばい　施設が整ってない期間のときほどやばい

Also feeling like @aleph1.underground.org would be super helpful and interested in Joe’s project here

Was it something I said? Perhaps about AI?

#AISlop #GenerativeAI #Blocking

Sign up or log in through my affiliate link at insurance-kalshi.com to get started.
@aleph1.underground.org

The set of all possible mathematical constructions with and without properties, using 0-dimensional pixels (form, missing-pixels-emptiness); is equal to 2^aleph1 = aleph1^aleph1 = aleph2, assuming CH and the axiom of choice

“a final moment in oblivion” 💫

my cover of “heart of lahai-roi” from wuthering waves is out now! i’m SO proud of how this video came together!

watch now: youtu.be/t7pfpaz_x-I?...

#wutheringwaves  #lahairoi #aemeath #aleph1

เพิ่งสังเกตว่าสกิล aleph1 คือหลุมดำ เข้ โคตรงาม

Well, that was a quick block. Here’s his bullshit, in case he deletes it.

@aleph1.underground.org Admiral Poopypants!?

hier wird 1+1=2 bewiesen:
https://www.aleph1.info/?call=Puc&permalink=mengenlehre1_1_12_Z2

a + a = | A × {0} ∪ A × {1} |
⇒
1 + 1 = | 1 × {0} ∪ 1 × {1} | = 2

I dunno. I can't remember. The size of the set of reals, called C, might be the same as Aleph1, or it might be larger but smaller than Aleph2 (the power set of the power set...) or it might be equal to Aleph2 or not.

If you apply this to the set of natural numbers (which we'll say is of size Aleph0 because we're mathematicians and we hate ASCII), you get the power set of the set of natural numbers, of size Aleph1 (yes, it's the Hebrew aleph. Deal.)

Is the size of the set of the reals the same as Aleph1?

Quand je me souviens de mes bouquins “Aleph1” de maths que je me trimballais, assez lourds et épais pour assommer un ministre...

Should have put P(N) to the left of aleph1 to annoy set theorists even more

any good names for orders that are complete up to cardinal kappa, so sup x_i, i in I existing if |I|<kappa? for kappa=aleph1 countably complete seems to be somewhat established but is there a general term? i need to name a typeclass

replaying infinity before bungie puts out nu-marathon and i'm honestly just so blown away that aleph1 is on steam now it feels unreal lol.

As an Aleph1 guy I agree.

Continuum hypothesis or not.

สุดท้ายก่อนปิดจ้อบ ลืมอวยอีกอย่างคือ ending ของแพทช์ 3.1 ทั้งเพลงทั้ง short animation? cinematic? ไม่รู้แหละมันเรียกว่าไร แต่ดูแล้วคือน้ำตาไหลมาก แม่ง โคตรเศร้า โคตรดี โคตรขยี้ โคตรอยากต่อยไอคุโระ อยากต่อยไอ aleph1 ด้วย แพทช์หน้าหรือแพทช์ไหนไม่รู้แหละแต่เร็วๆนี้ ยูโดนดิชั้นแน่ขร่ะ จะเอาให้หน้ายู่เลยคอยดู ซียูซูนบิช 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

the continuum hypothesis and its independence from ZFC has been a disaster for the "guy going aleph1 in a 2^aleph0 zone" race...