Will this attract BadLegalTakes back here?
April 28, 2024 at 10:27 PM
Will this attract BadLegalTakes back here?
I really wish BadLegalTakes would spend time here, since we’ve developed a solid cadre of sub-morons to keep them busy.
March 18, 2024 at 2:36 AM
I really wish BadLegalTakes would spend time here, since we’ve developed a solid cadre of sub-morons to keep them busy.
I miss BadLegalTakes. "Testimony is not evidence" was one of the top ten, with the added bonus of guaranteed misogyny on the side.
April 11, 2026 at 6:58 PM
I miss BadLegalTakes. "Testimony is not evidence" was one of the top ten, with the added bonus of guaranteed misogyny on the side.
I miss @BadLegalTakes
April 29, 2023 at 12:33 AM
I miss @BadLegalTakes
November 29, 2024 at 3:36 PM
I miss BadLegalTakes threads sometimes.
December 29, 2025 at 6:00 PM
I miss BadLegalTakes threads sometimes.
I don't remember. Entirely likely. Guy has got a permanent starring role on BadLegalTakes
September 12, 2024 at 6:17 PM
I don't remember. Entirely likely. Guy has got a permanent starring role on BadLegalTakes
The problem is people with #BadLegalTakes not understanding the difference between civil liability and criminal liability, and with all sorts of Bad Movie Law takes, like thinking you can stick "negligence" into any arbitrary statute.
September 27, 2026 at 2:31 PM
The problem is people with #BadLegalTakes not understanding the difference between civil liability and criminal liability, and with all sorts of Bad Movie Law takes, like thinking you can stick "negligence" into any arbitrary statute.
January 26, 2025 at 8:23 PM
“BadLegalTakes is committing a RICO violation by not posting on BlueSky”
[looks around expectantly]
[looks around expectantly]
September 12, 2024 at 10:15 PM
“BadLegalTakes is committing a RICO violation by not posting on BlueSky”
[looks around expectantly]
[looks around expectantly]
August 26, 2025 at 12:51 AM
February 24, 2024 at 4:58 PM
i saw a bunch of stuff about "lorenz needed to do this for legal purposes" and while i'm no lawyer it sounded like some badlegaltakes fodder
February 27, 2024 at 9:26 PM
i saw a bunch of stuff about "lorenz needed to do this for legal purposes" and while i'm no lawyer it sounded like some badlegaltakes fodder
More incredible insight from the cult. #badlegaltakes
November 21, 2024 at 6:23 AM
More incredible insight from the cult. #badlegaltakes
Part of the problem with the Musk/Tesla cult is that its followers are so incredibly dumb. #badlegaltakes
November 21, 2024 at 6:21 AM
Part of the problem with the Musk/Tesla cult is that its followers are so incredibly dumb. #badlegaltakes
It's the "Ever. At all." that put him over into BadLegalTakes territory. It's absolutely going to protect speech between private parties if they start suing each over the speech.
December 18, 2023 at 5:39 PM
It's the "Ever. At all." that put him over into BadLegalTakes territory. It's absolutely going to protect speech between private parties if they start suing each over the speech.
has badlegaltakes set up shop on bsky yet
June 17, 2025 at 11:14 PM
has badlegaltakes set up shop on bsky yet
This is, again, badlegaltakes being smug to the point of obscenity. It’s true that the president is not covered by the hatch act, but that’s not the point of what vindman said
June 11, 2025 at 9:19 PM
This is, again, badlegaltakes being smug to the point of obscenity. It’s true that the president is not covered by the hatch act, but that’s not the point of what vindman said
Seeing badlegaltakes posting people saying Trump is disqualified by the 14th Amendment was really driving me nuts.
January 31, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Seeing badlegaltakes posting people saying Trump is disqualified by the 14th Amendment was really driving me nuts.
“A wet signature” these people are incapable of being normal
March 17, 2025 at 5:23 PM
“A wet signature” these people are incapable of being normal
Harry is an account on Twitter, he posts regularly on @BadLegalTakes. His pfp is a purple hippo IIRC
May 7, 2024 at 11:18 PM
Harry is an account on Twitter, he posts regularly on @BadLegalTakes. His pfp is a purple hippo IIRC
As always, the worst legal takes are in BadLegalTakes' replies.
March 29, 2024 at 5:50 PM
As always, the worst legal takes are in BadLegalTakes' replies.
I think it is a bit, but its not a good enough bit to make me miss Twitter.
BadLegalTakes is really the only one I miss.
BadLegalTakes is really the only one I miss.
July 10, 2025 at 5:32 AM
I think it is a bit, but its not a good enough bit to make me miss Twitter.
BadLegalTakes is really the only one I miss.
BadLegalTakes is really the only one I miss.
It started in 2017 after I said his surety that Trump could not pardon himself was misplaced
He then got dog-walked after threatening to sue me for defamation
But finally blocked me when I tagged in BadLegalTakes in response to "We can just pass a Bill of Attainder with 51 votes!"
He then got dog-walked after threatening to sue me for defamation
But finally blocked me when I tagged in BadLegalTakes in response to "We can just pass a Bill of Attainder with 51 votes!"
November 20, 2024 at 7:32 AM
It started in 2017 after I said his surety that Trump could not pardon himself was misplaced
He then got dog-walked after threatening to sue me for defamation
But finally blocked me when I tagged in BadLegalTakes in response to "We can just pass a Bill of Attainder with 51 votes!"
He then got dog-walked after threatening to sue me for defamation
But finally blocked me when I tagged in BadLegalTakes in response to "We can just pass a Bill of Attainder with 51 votes!"
Same. This is why I hate the badlegaltakes account
August 28, 2023 at 5:35 PM
Same. This is why I hate the badlegaltakes account