President Donald Trump is secretly loathed by many of the Republican lawmakers who publicly claim to support him, according to a conservative commentator.Quoting Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY) from the lawmaker’s recent interview with Chataqua Today, The Bulwark’s Joe Perticone defended Trump’s $1.8 bi...

President Donald Trump is secretly loathed by many of the Republican lawmakers who publicly claim to support him, according to a conservative commentator. Quoting Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY) from the lawmaker’s recent interview with Chataqua Today, The Bulwark’s Joe Perticone defended Trump’s $1.8 billion slush fund for Trump-linked institutions and Trump supporters by saying “we have to have really tight scrutiny, a really high burden of proof as to how those monies are going to be distributed. I don’t think this should be seen as some direct slush fund for one particular event. I mean, there’s obviously a lot of arguments about people that claim to be falsely imprisoned. Just because they were pardoned, doesn’t mean that they were falsely imprisoned. They were charged and convicted of crimes—and there were juries of their peers that did that. I just think that we need far more answers, and I think that there’s many of us asking our leadership to go get to the bottom of that.” Later in the same interview, Langworthy doubled down by echoing Trump’s argument that his supporters have been victimized. “People’s lives and livelihoods have been ruined by lawfare and, you know, excessive aggression by the government,” Langworthy said. “But, you know, the way that this came together with a settlement, I think we have a little ways to go.” As Perticone pointed out, though, Langworthy expressed a very different view in a letter to a constituent this week. “While I strongly condemn the unlawful disclosure of President Trump’s tax returns and the weaponization of the federal government under President Biden, I do not believe American taxpayers should bear the financial cost for this weaponization,” Langworthy told the constituent. Other GOP lawmakers are attempting more subtle methods of flip-flopping.Rep. Laurel Lee (R-FL) wrote that “this is a rapidly evolving issue currently being addressed primarily in the Senate, and it remains unclear whether the House will consider related legislation or oversight measures.” House Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) instead told constituents in a letter that Trump “and his sons and family business” had filed the $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS for the leaking of tax return information and added that the president “moved to voluntarily drop the $10 billion lawsuit as part of a settlement agreement.” Although he promised to prioritize “safeguarding taxpayer information,” he refused to speak about the controversies surrounding the fund, including that it might pay Jan. 6th insurrectionists, line the president’s pockets, involved self-dealing (Trump controls both the IRS that he sued and the Justice Department assigned to represent that agency) and was rushed to avoid judicial oversight. Perticone only identified one Republican who was willing to stay “consistent,” the outgoing Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC). “In both public remarks and in letters to constituents, Tillis has fiercely opposed the fund,” Perticone wrote. “Much of his opposition has centered on the character of the people standing back and standing by for a share of the money.” He added, “‘These people don’t deserve restitution. Many of them deserve to be in prison,’ Tillis said Thursday. ‘But this is just stupid on stilts.’ In a constituent letter the same week, Tillis wrote, ‘I am opposed to this decision. Allegations of political bias within our justice system are serious matters, and I believe the DOJ must operate independently, impartially, and in accordance with the rule of law, regardless of who occupies the White House.’”Trump’s $1.8 billion slush fund is controlled by five individuals to be selected by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. In addition to dispensing $1.8 billion without any oversight, the settlement bars the IRS from ever investigating either Trump or his family members for past tax issues.

YouTube video by Chautauqua Institution