cwmk crņ
/úmaka áran/
|want-1s sleep|
"i want to sleep"
estóra:
غىس اسب اپىد بهرتپز
[ˈʀiːs əsˈnæ əpeːð ˈbəɦræt‿poz]
|bed onto RFL=1s turn-?=VOL-1s|
"i want to go to sleep"
Secxeý seclaidzi
1>1-want 1>1-sleep
sə˥kʃə˩ɰˀ sə˥kla˧jdzi˧
And a more recent one Wiera:
Yáhpááʔdumũ
fall.IND-DESID-V.EYE-1SG
("to sleep" being composite yáh-ʔ(V́)d- lit. "to fall with one's eye(s)")
ᵈjáhpááˀɖùmũ̀
cwmk crņ
/úmaka áran/
|want-1s sleep|
"i want to sleep"
estóra:
غىس اسب اپىد بهرتپز
[ˈʀiːs əsˈnæ əpeːð ˈbəɦræt‿poz]
|bed onto RFL=1s turn-?=VOL-1s|
"i want to go to sleep"
kwyw /kúyu/ is the general term for "again, once more". the only word similar to it is nŵ, which can be used for going back to a natural expected state. compare:
hrškw kwyw
"its raining again" (maybe for the second time this day)
hrškw nŵ
"its raining again" (the drought is over)
kwyw /kúyu/ is the general term for "again, once more". the only word similar to it is nŵ, which can be used for going back to a natural expected state. compare:
hrškw kwyw
"its raining again" (maybe for the second time this day)
hrškw nŵ
"its raining again" (the drought is over)
"cryšk hasn't always been the language we spoke today, it grew. in this video, ill explain this. during the evolution of cryšk there has been 3 stages: pre-proto-ariska, proto-ariska, and modern ariska"
(+)
"cryšk hasn't always been the language we spoke today, it grew. in this video, ill explain this. during the evolution of cryšk there has been 3 stages: pre-proto-ariska, proto-ariska, and modern ariska"
(+)
kyhys /kihísa/ "type of blade"
khr /kahára/ "potato"
thtkw /tahátaku/ "propagate"
shyr /sahíra/ "whisper"
kyhys /kihísa/ "type of blade"
khr /kahára/ "potato"
thtkw /tahátaku/ "propagate"
shyr /sahíra/ "whisper"
to clarify, the whole relative clause section is obsolete. and its interesting to see a time where the passive-verb-mood existed in ariska.
to clarify, the whole relative clause section is obsolete. and its interesting to see a time where the passive-verb-mood existed in ariska.
it only appears in ideophonic roots or in loans.
this is because *p lenited to /h/ in cryšk.
you may think of the /p/ in ideophonic roots as either an innovation or as a preservation of the proto-phoneme. which one is true is up for debate
it only appears in ideophonic roots or in loans.
this is because *p lenited to /h/ in cryšk.
you may think of the /p/ in ideophonic roots as either an innovation or as a preservation of the proto-phoneme. which one is true is up for debate