#dojmisconduct
Rs’ allowed: “accused #sexualpredators; Trump family conflicts of interest; felony pardon[s]; crypto…; Cabinet self-enrich; FCC…; strong-arm money…from corps; …foreign real estate…; #QatariAirForceOne…; harassment of journalists; … #DOJmisconduct; Trump…construction; & #Venezuela oil…profit taking.”
A Winning Four-Part Plan to Turn Up the Heat on Trump Enablers
Republicans must pay a price for spinelessness.
substack.com
August 7, 2026 at 3:22 AM
So she couldn’t use it as an Airbnb then. #DOJMisconduct
October 30, 2025 at 2:38 AM
Federal judge refers DOJ attorneys for disciplinary review over alleged misconduct in subpoena case

🤖 IA: It's not clickbait ✅
👥 Users: It's not clickbait ✅

#dojmisconduct #federalcourt #subpoenadispute

View full AI summary:
Federal judge refers DOJ attorneys for disciplinary review over alleged misconduct in subpoena case
A federal judge in Rhode Island appointed by former President Donald Trump has referred several Justice Department attorneys to a disciplinary committee following serious accusations of misconduct in a legal case involving medical records of minors. U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy issued the referral under local court rules after previously delivering a strongly worded 24-page ruling criticizing the DOJ’s handling of the case. The dispute centered on a subpoena seeking patient records from Rhode Island Hospital related to gender-affirming care provided to minors. In her ruling, McElroy concluded that DOJ attorneys misrepresented and withheld information from both her court and a federal court in Texas. She also accused the department of engaging in forum shopping to obtain a more favorable jurisdiction for its demands. The judge described aspects of the DOJ’s conduct as a serious breach of ethical obligations, including what she called a failure of candor to the court. She further criticized courtroom behavior, noting that a junior attorney with limited experience was left to respond to judicial questioning while a senior attorney remained silent. McElroy ultimately quashed the subpoena entirely, ruling that it lacked proper legal authorization, was pursued in bad faith, and violated constitutional privacy protections for minors. She also barred the DOJ from accessing or using any of the requested patient-identifying information. The disciplinary referral underscores the severity of the judge’s findings and raises the possibility of formal professional consequences for the attorneys involved. The case has drawn attention for its implications regarding government subpoenas, privacy rights in medical contexts, and the ethical responsibilities of federal prosecutors.
en.killbait.com
June 5, 2026 at 7:16 PM