#efta00091086
LightNews LightNews
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00091086.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00091086
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00091035 | EFTA00091086 SEC? Isn't that the job of the SEC OWB? Second, the fact that no one at the SEC contacted me DOES NOT mean the SEC didn't use my information. This is a completely bogus argument. It certainly would NOT be the first time the SEC used my information now would it Jane? In fact, it is NOT the responsibility of the whistleblower to get his/her information to the right Enforcement personnel. That responsibility EXPLICITLY falls on the SEC OWB. So, is the SEC OWB admitting gross negligence in handling my information? After the monumental failure in the Madoff Ponzi/ money laundering SEC facilitated scam on the public the then SEC IG made specific recommendations to the SEC with regards to the proper handling/vetting of Tips and Complaints. https://www.sec.gov/files/468.pdf Review and Analysis of OCIE Examinations of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC Review and Analysis of OCIE Examinations of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC Executive Summary Background. On June 25, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission's vAyw. sec .g ov AGAIN: The responsibility to properly vet Whistleblower information and get the information into the right hands at the SEC falls EXPLICITLY and EXCLUSIVELY with the SEC OWB itself and is NOT the responsibility of the whistleblower. Further, according to the previous SEC IG in the monumental Madoff failure: the responsibility to contact those supplying Tips and Complaints ALSO falls explicitly and exclusively with the SEC OWB and not the whistleblower. Using these excuses as the basis of denial of Award is completely contrary to SEC MANDATED protocols and procedures. Is the SEC OWB admitting it doesn't comply with those recommendations? Recall: the monumental SEC Madoff failure was NOT the fault of Whistleblowers either. OR is the SEC OWB scrambling for a 5 years in the waiting preliminary determination? So, after 5 years of waiting for a preliminary determination for my award claim, this is what the SEC best and brightest come up with? My Denial of Award for covered action 2015-016 was completely made up on the fly. The SEC OWB has applied completely fabricated "rules" to issue this denial. Further affirmation of ALL of my allegations. Also by SEC admission, the SEC allowed these 2 penny stock shells to remain a clear and present risk to the investing public. Were CGFIA and APCX ONLY money laundering shells for Oppenheimer in 2008-2010 and then suddenly they were no longer money laundering shells when NITE and UBSS traded billions of shares of both shells 2010-2013? WHY did it take until September 2018 before the SEC finally revoked the CGFIA registration? https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/b rowse-edgar?compa ny.Gar pa &owner=exclude&action=getcompa ny So, WHY was there no SEC investigation of NITE and UBSS trading activity in money laundering shells APCX and CGFIA? The SEC et al facilitated NITE "glitch" took place in August 2012. This SEC/Jefferies/JPM/BX/GS/SEC Chair Clayton Sullivan Cromwell colleague Jared Fishman et al bailout coincides directly with NITE trading activity in 2 SEC/FINRA/FINCEN acknowledged money laundering shells. AND the "bailout" penny stock esque reverse merger between Getco and Knight didn't close until July 2013. HOW could the SEC conduct a COMPLETE and thorough investigation into the FINRA Opco AML complaint WITHOUT implicating NITE when NITE was CLEARLY trading billions of shares of OTCM money laundering shells BEFORE and coinciding with the SEC et al facilitated EFTA00091086
April 21, 2026 at 12:04 AM