Soziale Berufe leben ja hauptsächlich vom ehrenamtlichen EnGaGagement - und das ist unbezahlbar. Deswegen glaubt auch jeder, der hier höhere Löhne anbieten muss, dass dies eine Beleidigung für die angestellten Menschen wäre - und lässt es. 🤷
March 18, 2024 at 6:58 PM
Soziale Berufe leben ja hauptsächlich vom ehrenamtlichen EnGaGagement - und das ist unbezahlbar. Deswegen glaubt auch jeder, der hier höhere Löhne anbieten muss, dass dies eine Beleidigung für die angestellten Menschen wäre - und lässt es. 🤷
The purpose of statements are more than persuasion.
Statements like this are for high-engagagement sickos. Not the median voter.
Now, it's *bad* at being for engaged partisans. There's no anima or clear narrative in the statement.
But mentioning the implicit racism and sexism *is* important.
Statements like this are for high-engagagement sickos. Not the median voter.
Now, it's *bad* at being for engaged partisans. There's no anima or clear narrative in the statement.
But mentioning the implicit racism and sexism *is* important.
August 26, 2025 at 6:29 PM
The purpose of statements are more than persuasion.
Statements like this are for high-engagagement sickos. Not the median voter.
Now, it's *bad* at being for engaged partisans. There's no anima or clear narrative in the statement.
But mentioning the implicit racism and sexism *is* important.
Statements like this are for high-engagagement sickos. Not the median voter.
Now, it's *bad* at being for engaged partisans. There's no anima or clear narrative in the statement.
But mentioning the implicit racism and sexism *is* important.
