Schools and libraries across the United States are protesting a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposal that could significantly reduce or eliminate funding for the E-Rate program, which provides discounted internet access to educational institutions. The E-Rate program, a $2 billion annual initiative, has been instrumental in connecting students and library patrons to the internet for educational purposes. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has criticized school districts for what he describes as 'experimenting with a massive increase in screen time for students,' arguing that the program has expanded beyond its original purpose of supporting basic internet access. In June, Carr led a 2-1 vote to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking public comment on whether E-Rate should be 'limited or sunset to reflect today's extensive connectivity rates.' The proposed changes could result in reduced discounts for schools and libraries on telecommunications services and equipment, as well as stricter restrictions on how E-Rate funds can be used. The National Association of Elementary School Principals has strongly supported the continued operation of the E-Rate program, urging the FCC to reject proposals that would eliminate or substantially restrict it. The American Library Association has also weighed in, stating that the FCC lacks the authority to regulate screen time or determine educational outcomes, emphasizing that such decisions should be made by school boards and local educational authorities. The FCC has already scaled back E-Rate funding in the past year by ending support for Wi-Fi hotspots and school bus internet services. However, the American Library Association has clarified that the E-Rate program is mandated by Congress, and the FCC is only responsible for administering it, not terminating it. The Association has stressed that under U.S. law, determinations about inappropriate content for children must be made by school boards or local educational agencies, not the FCC. The ongoing debate highlights the tension between federal regulatory efforts and the educational community's need for reliable internet access for students and library users.