Much better that people get validation messages telling them what is wrong. Plus they might be pasting something they then edit down.
Silently refusing input is an anti pattern
Me: "Yes, that is exactly the situation and what I want to do!"
BBMP: "You'll just need your password, and the SMS code we've sent to the mobile we have on record for you."
Me: 🤦♀️
Uber, AirBnB, Apple, 02 👀 looking at you! I'm sure this goes for many, many other comps too.
#UCD #UserCentredDesign #ServiceDesign #Digital #UnhappyPath #EdgeCase
In 2008 I worked on a bunch of e-commerce sites like Boots, Argos and Homebase.
We marked required fields with a little red asterisk.
It’s clean.
It’s conventional.
It’s what everyone else did.
But we never ran usability tests...
As does @adamsilverhq.bsky.social
And @iknowdavehouse.bsky.social
We all loathe them. Why do they persist?
As does @adamsilverhq.bsky.social
And @iknowdavehouse.bsky.social
We all loathe them. Why do they persist?
xkcd.com/3175/
xkcd.com/3175/
Pro tip: "Country of your passport" is definitely NOT the same thing (for many people) as "Country of residence".
When booking tickets with the Swedish night train Snälltåget, you’re asked for your “country of residence”.
However, it also asks for the country of issue on your passport.
These are very different things.
👇🏻
Ask 1 thing at a time.
Test your forms!
Pro tip: "Country of your passport" is definitely NOT the same thing (for many people) as "Country of residence".
(German government forms)
Also, doing it twice because when you hit “done,” the day isn’t right yet.
#FixTheForms, Berlin!
(German government forms)
It’s adding another layer to the nightmare.
Visualise it.
xkcd.com/2347/
It’s adding another layer to the nightmare.
Visualise it.
xkcd.com/2347/
Thrilled to be invited.
webdevconf.com
Thrilled to be invited.
… nope, no spoilers. Read the thread.
1. The NHS text my phone telling me I will soon receive appointment information. In this email, I am told I can manage my appointments using their app
2. So I download the app.
3. After installing the app...
… nope, no spoilers. Read the thread.
instead of actually fixing the form, someone is throwing AI into a highly confidential interview to deal with 30-plus pages of paperwork
Pro tip: fix forms, don’t add complex technology to them instead
Either a 30-35 page form is actually collecting necessary information - in which case I’d rather it wasn’t filled in using transcription software - or it isn’t, which in case cut down the form.
He’s not a criminal - he’s been creating tools that are massively saving staff time and are now being rolled out across the Prison Service.
The No10 Innovation Fellows were set up to do exactly this - helping us to move fast and fix things.
instead of actually fixing the form, someone is throwing AI into a highly confidential interview to deal with 30-plus pages of paperwork
Pro tip: fix forms, don’t add complex technology to them instead
Everything is wrong with it at all layers
- interaction design (the NO target is as close to the YES response as it is to the NO response) ...
- content design (reminder: no yes/no questions)
...
(1/2)
These statements in all caps feel like the questions are being shouted at you
Also the form is meant to be for neurodivergent people
This is only the beginning 🫠
Everything is wrong with it at all layers
- interaction design (the NO target is as close to the YES response as it is to the NO response) ...
- content design (reminder: no yes/no questions)
...
(1/2)
Extra-large radio button and check box targets on GOV.UK. Quicker for everyone and more accessible.
designnotes.blog.gov.uk/2016/11/30/w...
Note focus shared between form stakeholders, users and processors
Note lack of “this new form building tool magically made the forms better”
Thanks @paulpistorius.bsky.social and Julian
You need to involve the right parties in the #formDesign process right from the start.
📺 Here’s the ‘Triangle of Success’ talk my colleagues Julian & @paulpistorius.bsky.social shared at Code for America’s #FormFest:
youtu.be/th9iNKBmGe0?...
#GovDesign
Note focus shared between form stakeholders, users and processors
Note lack of “this new form building tool magically made the forms better”
Thanks @paulpistorius.bsky.social and Julian
"Please check you have completed this form in full."
Sweetie, you asked me for my fax number. I haven't had a fax number in at least 15 years.
"Please check you have completed this form in full."
Sweetie, you asked me for my fax number. I haven't had a fax number in at least 15 years.
Interaction design: no problem
Content design: perfectly ok
Service design: hilariously poor
Thanks for this @rachelcoldicutt.bsky.social
Interaction design: no problem
Content design: perfectly ok
Service design: hilariously poor
Thanks for this @rachelcoldicutt.bsky.social
Pro tip: names can include punctuation or spaces.
Pro tip: names can include punctuation or spaces.
Note for #GovDesign folks: I estimate this person took between 2 and 5 years to fix this form. 2 years is a super-speedy fix for us.
Note for #GovDesign folks: I estimate this person took between 2 and 5 years to fix this form. 2 years is a super-speedy fix for us.
You can see this for yourself at assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6735e4...
It’s the help equivalent of “lorum ipsum”
Pro tip: test those phone numbers
Your response has been recorded. We will contact you as soon as possible. You may always contact us directly at 123-456-7890 for faster service.
It’s the help equivalent of “lorum ipsum”
Pro tip: test those phone numbers
slate.com/technology/2...