We really did not want to do IFAB corner again so soon, BUT...
We really did not want to do IFAB corner again so soon, BUT...
🔴Stop deprioritising violent conduct and serious foul play
🔴Stop focusing on nonsense nobody cares about
🔴Treat dangerous tackles around the head / face far more seriously.
🔴Stop deprioritising violent conduct and serious foul play
🔴Stop focusing on nonsense nobody cares about
🔴Treat dangerous tackles around the head / face far more seriously.
I have much more on the Guardian:
www.theguardian.com/football/202...
I have much more on the Guardian:
www.theguardian.com/football/202...
It's not the line of the sleeve as the broadcast is saying.
Let's see which one the league & refs roll with.
It's not the line of the sleeve as the broadcast is saying.
Let's see which one the league & refs roll with.
"if the offence was stopping or interfering with a promising attack, no card is shown as playing the advantage allowed the attack to continue"
"if the offence was stopping or interfering with a promising attack, no card is shown as playing the advantage allowed the attack to continue"
Quelle: RMC
(First screenshot comes from IFAB, second is the Premier League guidance that explicitly references using your head to make contact to another player's head)
(First screenshot comes from IFAB, second is the Premier League guidance that explicitly references using your head to make contact to another player's head)
“UEFA will enter discussions with FIFA and IFAB to determine whether the rule should be reviewed in cases where a double touch is clearly unintentional.”
“UEFA will enter discussions with FIFA and IFAB to determine whether the rule should be reviewed in cases where a double touch is clearly unintentional.”
Used at the Euros last summer, and the Champions League and Bundesliga since then. IFAB likes the rule too, so we might see it spread farther.
Used at the Euros last summer, and the Champions League and Bundesliga since then. IFAB likes the rule too, so we might see it spread farther.