A *bunch* of background linguistics knowledge needed that I can't really recap here
A *bunch* of background linguistics knowledge needed that I can't really recap here
Counterargument: they used k here because χ would have suggested lenition? Maybe? Idk it doesn't make sense.
Counterargument: they used k here because χ would have suggested lenition? Maybe? Idk it doesn't make sense.
'Suivre' I find harder to explain; it appears to have arisen from a merger of metathesised OF 'siure' on the one hand, and 'sivre' with /w/ > /v/ on the other.
'Suivre' I find harder to explain; it appears to have arisen from a merger of metathesised OF 'siure' on the one hand, and 'sivre' with /w/ > /v/ on the other.
Normally we can't really tell if lenition happened, as they're written the same. We only see stuff like w and b rafe being confused
Normally we can't really tell if lenition happened, as they're written the same. We only see stuff like w and b rafe being confused
("Gabh and ghabh mean the same thing! What's the point? The h just ruins the g!" etc. etc.)
("Gabh and ghabh mean the same thing! What's the point? The h just ruins the g!" etc. etc.)
-Full zine: tinyurl.com/4tspjfmj
-IDs: tinyurl.com/49vv32pa
-Full zine: tinyurl.com/4tspjfmj
-IDs: tinyurl.com/49vv32pa