Same 128b bus, same 2SEs, but w/ Octa-SIMD WGPs, 4X IFC capacity and 2X IFC Buswidth
This is essentially adding Infinity Cache again
/1
Same 128b bus, same 2SEs, but w/ Octa-SIMD WGPs, 4X IFC capacity and 2X IFC Buswidth
This is essentially adding Infinity Cache again
/1
👉 Baca artikel lengkap di sini: https://ahmandonk.com/2026/06/17/bocoran-benchmark-steam-machine-valve-fremont/
#amd ##amdh#benchmarkU#coreUltraX7358h #gameb#geekbench6w#hardwarel#intelo#konsol3#navi33 href="/hashtag/pa" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link">#pa
👉 Baca artikel lengkap di sini: https://ahmandonk.com/2026/06/17/bocoran-benchmark-steam-machine-valve-fremont/
#amd ##amdh#benchmarkU#coreUltraX7358h #gameb#geekbench6w#hardwarel#intelo#konsol3#navi33 href="/hashtag/pa" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link">#pa
AMD、Radeon RX 7650 GREがNavi 33採用で2025第1四半期に登場予定
AMD, Radeon RX 7650 GRE to be released in Q1 2025 with Navi 33
youtu.be/YJ8b3IAelrQ
AMD、Radeon RX 7650 GREがNavi 33採用で2025第1四半期に登場予定
AMD, Radeon RX 7650 GRE to be released in Q1 2025 with Navi 33
youtu.be/YJ8b3IAelrQ
This is essentially a simplified look at "Architectural Efficiency"
This is essentially a simplified look at "Architectural Efficiency"
Navi31 has MORE silicon on N6 than Navi33
Yes, that means just the MCDs in AMD's high end chip cost more to manufacture than the entirety of their low end, not even accounting for packaging cost
(Only applies to Radeon RX 7900 XTX and Radeon PRO W7900)
Navi31 has MORE silicon on N6 than Navi33
Yes, that means just the MCDs in AMD's high end chip cost more to manufacture than the entirety of their low end, not even accounting for packaging cost
(Only applies to Radeon RX 7900 XTX and Radeon PRO W7900)
Aldebaran is supposedly Arcturus + 2X FLOPS + New Features + smaller die + way higher Perf/W + MCM
Navi33 is supposedly higher perf than Navi21 while being smaller AND more efficient
What are we missing here?
How is AMD doing this?
Aldebaran is supposedly Arcturus + 2X FLOPS + New Features + smaller die + way higher Perf/W + MCM
Navi33 is supposedly higher perf than Navi21 while being smaller AND more efficient
What are we missing here?
How is AMD doing this?
Navi33 is apparently 4096SPs, not 5120
That means an RDNA3 card that can (presumably) beat Navi21 is just 16WGPs
Of course, this begs the question of where the 60WGP Navi31 would land
/1
Navi33 is apparently 4096SPs, not 5120
That means an RDNA3 card that can (presumably) beat Navi21 is just 16WGPs
Of course, this begs the question of where the 60WGP Navi31 would land
/1