October 31, 2026 at 11:09 PM
November 3, 2026 at 12:10 PM
Z czym to można skojarzyć...?
Np. 👉👉👉"Nie jesteście sędziami"
Np. 👉👉👉"Nie jesteście sędziami"
November 2, 2026 at 10:18 AM
Z czym to można skojarzyć...?
Np. 👉👉👉"Nie jesteście sędziami"
Np. 👉👉👉"Nie jesteście sędziami"
October 31, 2026 at 8:37 PM
Lubię te wieczorne shoppingi 😆 Dziś np. kupiłam sobie betonową ziemiankę 😄 Będzie idealna do sadu, min. do przechowywania owoców 🫠😊
November 2, 2026 at 8:31 PM
Lubię te wieczorne shoppingi 😆 Dziś np. kupiłam sobie betonową ziemiankę 😄 Będzie idealna do sadu, min. do przechowywania owoców 🫠😊
#Newspoll ALP 27 L-NP 21 ON 28 Grn 13 Ind/other 11
No 2PP. My estimate for this poll 51.7 to ALP vs L-NP (-1.8)
My ALP vs ON estimate 50.7 to ALP (-1.6)
No 2PP. My estimate for this poll 51.7 to ALP vs L-NP (-1.8)
My ALP vs ON estimate 50.7 to ALP (-1.6)
November 1, 2026 at 9:50 AM
#Newspoll ALP 27 L-NP 21 ON 28 Grn 13 Ind/other 11
No 2PP. My estimate for this poll 51.7 to ALP vs L-NP (-1.8)
My ALP vs ON estimate 50.7 to ALP (-1.6)
No 2PP. My estimate for this poll 51.7 to ALP vs L-NP (-1.8)
My ALP vs ON estimate 50.7 to ALP (-1.6)
October 31, 2026 at 9:52 AM
P=NP, I’m fairly certain.
few understand this.
few understand this.
November 3, 2026 at 12:45 AM
P=NP, I’m fairly certain.
few understand this.
few understand this.
Paper 911 also claims P = NP
November 3, 2026 at 8:50 PM
Paper 911 also claims P = NP
Marsh sun orchid (Thelymitra longiloba) in Croajingolong NP, E. Gippsland, VIC. This plant has slightly wider petals/sepals than more typical 'star-like' flowering forms. Only found the one still out at this location (tho it can be easy to miss this sp. amongst a range of similar blue sun #orchids!)
October 31, 2026 at 6:39 AM
Marsh sun orchid (Thelymitra longiloba) in Croajingolong NP, E. Gippsland, VIC. This plant has slightly wider petals/sepals than more typical 'star-like' flowering forms. Only found the one still out at this location (tho it can be easy to miss this sp. amongst a range of similar blue sun #orchids!)
- Paper 488 claims to prove P = NP. Paper 872 claims to prove P != NP. At least one is wrong! (My wager: both)
- 339 submissions have only one author, 286 different authors have at least one solo-author paper. About half these authors have never published in STOC/FOCS/SODA before
- 339 submissions have only one author, 286 different authors have at least one solo-author paper. About half these authors have never published in STOC/FOCS/SODA before
November 3, 2026 at 7:24 PM
- Paper 488 claims to prove P = NP. Paper 872 claims to prove P != NP. At least one is wrong! (My wager: both)
- 339 submissions have only one author, 286 different authors have at least one solo-author paper. About half these authors have never published in STOC/FOCS/SODA before
- 339 submissions have only one author, 286 different authors have at least one solo-author paper. About half these authors have never published in STOC/FOCS/SODA before
(np sagt: kein schuppan, kein bobic, kein kehl, kein krösche auf der liste)
November 2, 2026 at 6:33 PM
(np sagt: kein schuppan, kein bobic, kein kehl, kein krösche auf der liste)
