Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has just been handed an unflinching mirror at the Pacific Islands Forum.

Countries of the South Pacific have good reason to encourage China and other countries to assist them with infrastructure. And there is nothing that Australia should, or could, do about it.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has just been handed an unflinching mirror at the Pacific Islands Forum.

The Pacific Academy of Sciences amplifies Pacific voices, addressing climate challenges through Indigenous knowledge, advocacy, and collaboration.

There are concerns tensions between China and Taiwan could explode into the open at this year's meeting, distracting from the key Pacific priorities.

Crucial for coastal communities, mangroves are threatened by land clearing, development and rising seas

WHAT if the most powerful piece of climate infrastructure in the Pacific is not a seawall, a solar panel, or an early warning system.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong are intensifying diplomatic efforts in the Pacific region to balance national security concerns with trade interests. The week of engagements with leaders from India, Fiji, Tonga, Samoa, Solomon Islands, and Papua New Guinea highlights Australia's strategic pivot to counter China's growing influence. Key initiatives include strengthening regional security alliances, reinforcing partnerships through cultural ties like rugby league, and negotiating agreements to limit China's military presence. The article underscores the importance of regional cooperation to safeguard Australia's sovereignty, with warnings that China's ambitions could threaten Pacific stability. Former AFP commissioner Krissy Barrett's insights on the need for collaborative security frameworks are cited, alongside concerns over China's militarization and the potential for geopolitical conflict. The article also notes Australia's growing reliance on India as a counterbalance to China, while emphasizing the necessity of maintaining diplomatic engagement despite rising tensions.

A new report warns that commercial deep-sea mining in the Pacific could commence as early as 2027 without adequate policy safeguards, amid escalating competition between the United States and China for critical minerals. The Lowy Institute analysis highlights that the Pacific Ocean floor holds vast reserves of resources essential for batteries, weapons systems, and power grids. However, Pacific Island nations face a dilemma: they are torn between potential economic benefits from mining deals and risks to their ecosystems, fisheries, food security, and cultural heritage. The absence of an international governance framework leaves these nations vulnerable to corporate negotiations lacking legal protections. Australia, though yet to take a clear stance, is positioned to influence the debate through its diplomatic ties and regional alliances. The report urges Pacific states to resist individual agreements with powerful entities and advocate for collective safeguards. Meanwhile, governments like Australia are securing critical mineral supplies through strategic reserves, reflecting broader global efforts to secure resources amid geopolitical tensions.

The article examines how small island nations in the South Pacific are skillfully balancing their relationships with both China and Western countries. While Australia strengthens defense partnerships with nations like Vanuatu and Fiji, China responds by offering economic investments and infrastructure projects. These nations are leveraging the geopolitical competition between Beijing and Canberra to secure security guarantees from the West while simultaneously benefiting from Chinese trade opportunities. The piece highlights Australia's strategic push to become the Pacific region's preferred security partner, countering China's growing influence through bilateral defense agreements. Analysts note that this balancing act reflects a broader trend of regional actors avoiding direct alignment with either power, instead pursuing hedging strategies that maximize their sovereignty and economic interests. The article underscores the complex dynamics at play as global powers vie for influence in a region historically overlooked by major geopolitical players.

New Zealand and other Pacific Island nations urged condemnation of China's recent intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) test during a regional forum meeting in Fiji, but faced resistance from key members. The 18-nation Pacific Islands Forum has yet to issue an official response to the test, despite concerns raised by leaders like Tuvalu’s foreign affairs official Pasuna Tuaga, who warned of potential tsunami risks from the missile landing near their territory. China's unannounced missile launch sparked debates over regional security and diplomatic alignment, with Australia’s Foreign Minister Penny Wong acknowledging Pacific nations’ concerns but noting that pro-China countries like Kiribati, Nauru, and Vanuatu showed little interest in formal criticism. The meeting in Suva highlights ongoing tensions between maintaining regional unity and addressing perceived threats from China's expanding military presence. Tuvalu sought assistance from Australia, France, and the U.S. to locate the test’s dummy warhead, while New Zealand’s Winston Peters criticized the region for missing an opportunity to collectively address the issue. The forum’s potential response may focus on security needs without directly mentioning the missile test or China, reflecting deepening divisions among Pacific leaders.

There's an emerging new world order – China, Russia, Indonesia, India and Brazil – and Australia is not even part of the conversation.