#partiallynude
LightNews LightNews
drachenphoto.bsky.social
M.

Model: minininilook

#partiallynude #artnude #woman #bnw #photography #windowlight #breasts #teilakt #sw #fotografie
October 1, 2025 at 7:54 PM
johannamation.bsky.social
Yall this might be the best figure drawing I’ve made in my entire life so far 🤩 🤩
A watercolor and marker sketch of a reclining partiallynude female covered with red drapery on a bed in a 19th century chateau parlor
April 28, 2025 at 8:02 PM
mbellezaartsphl.bsky.social
Erick in underwear (@erickvalera on IG )
2025
Colored pencils on paper

#maleanatomy #malephysique #maleunderwear #malenude #nudemale #partiallynude #underwear #coloredpencilonpaper #coloredpencil
November 14, 2025 at 1:58 PM
mbellezaartsphl.bsky.social
An Intimate Perspective of A Male Beauty in Underwear
(reference: Adam @add_em_up12 ) based on a photogrpah by @jkolephotography
2026
Colored pencils on paper

#maleunderwear #partiallynude #coloredpencilsonpaper #maleunderwearinart
January 21, 2026 at 1:27 PM
whoisthishotguy.bsky.social
Please help identify this model #bottomless #model #butt #partiallynude
November 29, 2024 at 3:54 AM
honeybuttersweet.bsky.social
Budoir-Style Pose | October Challenge: @ me with your pose suggestion! 💌

#hotties #bigbooty #adultsonly #fetish #goddess #assworship #partiallynude #Lingerie #camgirl #freensfwcontent #ebonygoddess #Ebonysky #EbonyNsfw #blackskynsfw #realnsfw #nsfwbsky #maskfetish #blueskynsfw
October 7, 2025 at 2:42 AM
honeybuttersweet.bsky.social
Budoir-Style Pose | October Challenge: @ me with your pose suggestion! 💌
Lol Spider-Gwen pose?
#hotties #bigbooty #adultsonly #fetish #goddess #assworship #partiallynude #Lingerie #camgirl #freensfwcontent #ebonygoddess #Ebonysky #EbonyNsfw #blackskynsfw #realnsfw #nsfwbsky #maskfetish #blueskynsfw
October 8, 2025 at 4:16 AM
honeybuttersweet.bsky.social
Budoir-Style Pose | October Challenge: First Entry Done

@ me with your pose suggestion! 💌

#hotties #bigbooty #adultsonly #fetish #goddess #assworship #partiallynude #Lingerie #camgirl #freensfwcontent #ebonygoddess #Ebonysky #EbonyNsfw #blackskynsfw #realnsfw #nsfwbsky #maskfetish #blueskynsfw
October 5, 2025 at 4:49 PM
honeybuttersweet.bsky.social
Want the rest of this photo? Just taken about 30 minutes ago. #bigareolas #nipples #tits #boobs #nsfw #sellingcontent for those #buyingcontent #partialnude #partiallynude #ebonyslut #ebonyhottie

2 other pics

1 showing some #fatass and another showing more #titty

$4 each
August 25, 2025 at 1:08 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00076325.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00076325
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00076303 | EFTA00076325 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-1 Filed 07/12/19 Page 9 of 10 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forcied] off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00076325
April 20, 2026 at 12:25 PM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00147219.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00147219
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00147211 | EFTA00147219 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forcied] off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00147219
April 22, 2026 at 6:26 PM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00105500.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00105500
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00105478 | EFTA00105500 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-1 Filed 07/12/19 Page 9 of 10 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forcied] off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00105500 Epstein Web iOS app on the App Store.
April 21, 2026 at 10:49 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00105476.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00105476
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00105468 | EFTA00105476 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forcied] off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00105476
April 21, 2026 at 10:48 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00104035.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00104035
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00104027 | EFTA00104035 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forc[edl off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. 5 The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00104035
April 21, 2026 at 9:49 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00100402.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00100402
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00100380 | EFTA00100402 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-1 Filed 07/12/19 Page 9 of 10 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forcied] off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00100402
April 21, 2026 at 7:13 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00099798.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00099798
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00099790 | EFTA00099798 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forc[edl off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. 5 The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00099798
April 21, 2026 at 6:46 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00096150.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00096150
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00096142 | EFTA00096150 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forcied] off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00096150 Epstein Web iOS app on the App Store.
April 21, 2026 at 3:56 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00092049.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00092049
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00092041 | EFTA00092049 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forcied] off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00092049
April 21, 2026 at 12:48 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00092038.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00092038
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00092030 | EFTA00092038 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forcied] off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00092038
April 21, 2026 at 12:48 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00089415.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00089415
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00089393 | EFTA00089415 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-1 Filed 07/12/19 Page 9 of 10 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forcied] off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00089415 Epstein Web iOS app on the App Store.
April 20, 2026 at 10:50 PM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Parts 1-2/2 — EFTA00080508.jpg
#epsteinweb #efta00080508
https://epsteinweb.org
Available in the iOS app store now!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/epstein-web/id6758880661
EFTA00080486 | EFTA00080508 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-1 Filed 07/12/19 Page 9 of 10 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 9 harassed both [redacted] in connection to this attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process all in violation of 18 USC 1512(d)(1)."5 Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D. Fla.), Dkts. 361 at 3-4, 361-7 through 361-11. In addition to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), prosecutors also proposed that the defendant could plead guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 403, that is, a knowing or intentional violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses, to which the defendant's thencounsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. Dkt. 361-11. They also discussed a possible obstruction plea that "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [redacted] father, forcing off the road." Id. Dkt. 361-10. The defendant's apparent previous willingness to obstruct a federal investigation, harass or tamper with witnesses, and hire private investigators that "forcied] off the road" the father of an individual relevant in the investigation is alarming. It should especially weigh on the Court's consideration here because the defendant was apparently willing to take those steps before even being charged and thus facing federal indictment; the incentive to interfere in the Government's case here, where an Indictment has been returned, is exponentially greater. And as discussed above, the defendant has nearly limitless means to do so. Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, on July 6-7, 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds—and perhaps thousands-of sexually suggestive photographs of fully- or partiallynude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude or partially-nude photographs appear to be of underage girls, including at least one girl who, according to her counsel, was underage at the time the relevant photographs were taken. Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found compact discs with hand-written labels including the following: "Young [Name] + [Name]," "Misc nudes 1," and "Girl pics nude." The defendant, a registered sex offender, is not reformed, he is not chastened, he is not repentant;6 rather, he is a continuing danger to the community and an individual who faces devastating evidence supporting deeply serious charges. The redactions above are contained in the publicly filed version of the quoted document. 6 See, e.g., Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, N.Y. Post (2011) ("I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an "offender," the financier told The Post yesterday. `It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel."'); Philip Weiss, The Fantasist, New York Magazine (2007) ("`It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,' I said. `Did Icarus like massages?' Epstein asked."). EFTA00080508
April 20, 2026 at 3:10 PM