#platform-risk
if they did this heavy-handed manipulation of how the platform worked in order to hurt Musk's critics, do you think they might have manipulated the platform in the run-up to the 2024 election, the election that Elon Musk said carried existential risk for him?
The New York Times found three users on X who feuded with Mr. Musk in December only to see their reach on the social platform practically vanish overnight.

www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
They Criticized Musk on X. Then Their Reach Collapsed.
Three users who disagreed with the site’s owner saw views for their posts plummet.
www.nytimes.com
April 23, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Yeougui is a professional who doesn't risk her platform by testing the rules. If Yeougui gets fucked, all of us are fucked.
May 3, 2026 at 4:19 PM
Amnesty said nothing had changed on X since the riots, and that the platform 'presents a serious human rights risk.'
August 7, 2025 at 11:20 AM
To be clear, this risk is so high on X because the platform is owned by a person who does not see CSAM as disqualifying behavior on the platform, let alone objectionable. He will try to profit from this. bsky.app/profile/lora...
more on the nightmarish situation on X where users are apparently generating non consenting pirnographic imagery & sexual images of minors (csam) using xAI’s Grok. Musk merged xAI and X (fka twitter) last year.
January 2, 2026 at 3:28 AM
He says while posting on a platform that deliberately puts children at risk …
June 8, 2026 at 8:41 AM
BREAKING: Elon Musk tweets probed by UK counter-extremism unit as alarm raised over risk to Britain

www.mirror.co.uk/news/politic...
Elon Musk tweets probed by counter-extremism unit amid fears over risk to UK
Tech billionaire Elon Musk has been using his platform X/Twitter to launch a barrage of attacks on the Labour government over the grooming gangs scandal
www.mirror.co.uk
January 9, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Report finds Elon Musk’s platform X is fueling falsehoods and conspiracy theories that risk undermining rescue efforts — and preparations for Hurricane Milton.
Officials face antisemitic attacks over Hurricane Helene response
Report finds Elon Musk’s platform is fueling falsehoods and conspiracy theories that risk undermining rescue efforts — and preparations for Hurricane Milton.
www.washingtonpost.com
October 8, 2024 at 2:04 PM
It's not merely foolish or comical, it is against the law to discuss classified matters (war plans!) on non-classified, non-government platforms. It's also a national security risk. This platform could well have been compromised by foreign intelligence services or by others at home or abroad.
March 24, 2025 at 6:35 PM
His ban criteria:

1. Is trans woman? Ban

2. Is transphobe pedophile apologist troll? Risk the entire platform to keep them unbanned
December 20, 2024 at 3:19 PM
… because that’s what the platform is for. thred.com/culture/why-...
Why is Andrew Tate #1 on Substack?
Manosphere figurehead and notorious misogynist Andrew Tate has the #1 bestseller spot on Substack this week. Is the platform at risk of becoming as toxic as eve
thred.com
June 3, 2026 at 6:41 PM
I strongly encourage Republicans to run on a “we promise to force grieving moms to give birth to dead fetuses at great risk to their own health” platform.
The perverse pointless cruelty of forcing a woman to risk her life giving birth to a guaranteed DOA baby is breathtaking. And there’s ZERO political upside! WHO is this for? A handful of power-mad sadists? Just mind-boggling wickedness.
December 9, 2023 at 2:51 PM
@aaron.bsky.team Why do you seem unwilling to associate yourself with the risk that the platform you’re responsible for may be using its power in unfair ways?
May 11, 2026 at 7:49 PM
I've known @jeffjarvis.bsky.social for almost 25 years and the reason I've always respected him is that it is a genuine risk to his career and status for him to plainly say the truth on this kind of platform. And it has impact that he does so.
Jarvis: You're not going to like what I'm saying next, but we are in the middle of a totalitarian fascist coup in this country.
February 27, 2025 at 3:59 AM
Not because the users want an adults-only platform specifically. But because normal adults don't want to keep running into barriers in communicating with other normal adults about whatever they want without risk of being unnecessarily censored by the platform. Which includes fetish material.
June 13, 2026 at 6:48 PM
I left my feedback as one copypaste saying "You risk making people leave the website if the moderation is excessive. If this isnt a viable platform financially, people will abandon it." paraphrasing for text space.
August 14, 2025 at 11:49 PM
NEW: People in Mississippi can no longer use the social media platform Bluesky due to age verification laws.

In response, Bluesky has chosen to block access in the state rather than risk potential fines of up to $10,000 per user.
Bluesky Goes Dark in Mississippi Over Age Verification Law
Bluesky has chosen to block access in the state rather than risk potential fines of up to $10,000 per violation.
www.wired.com
August 22, 2025 at 10:19 PM
These are the "high risk" payment processors actively advertising themselves as friendly towards adult content

There is no "oh just use [alternative]" to fall back on. There is no other service or platform to save us.

It is NOW. We either fend them off NOW or we are all fucked
September 10, 2025 at 3:15 AM
I maintain that this is the moment a lot of folks realise that they can just do direct deals with porting houses and marketing teams.

Publishers got used to low risk thanks to platform deals and crowdfunding. They need to remember that ‘absorbs risk’ is their primary non-replaceable role tout suite
"we shouldn't have to work for free on a game until it's nearly-done enough to get funding" and "it's the only thing you can really do so you should do it if you want to make games" are both true imo and it's shit but what else is there really to do that isn't just give up
February 12, 2026 at 10:49 AM
saw this post (that uses the last moment of kirk’s life as a reaction gif) bouncing around x this weekend & it feels like a perfect encapsulation of how irony poisoned/detached the dominant culture of that platform has become. at the risk of seeming like a dweeb i find it genuinely chilling/alarming
October 6, 2025 at 6:18 PM
LGBTQ human beings in this country have never been more vulnerable or at risk than they are today.

This Administration has built a platform upon their dehumanization.

johnpavlovitz.substack.com/p/to-lgbtq-a...
This Pride Month Requires Stronger LGBTQ Allies
Allyship is now an act of war
johnpavlovitz.substack.com
June 4, 2025 at 12:50 AM
Anyone on X is at risk. It’s a giant doxxing platform. See what’s happening to the fashion guy.
June 10, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Government of Canada creates platform for Canada-wide flood risk awareness: Canada’s Flood Risk Finder #Canada

www.canada.ca/en/public-sa...
Government of Canada creates platform for Canada-wide flood risk awareness: Canada’s Flood Risk Finder  - Canada.ca
Today, The Honourable Eleanor Olszewski provided an update on the development of Canada’s Flood Risk Finder, Canada’s first national, publicly available source of flood hazard and risk information. Th...
www.canada.ca
April 27, 2026 at 4:54 PM
Stickering is a fun, easy, low-risk activity that communicates directly with people in your town, most of whom don't use this digital platform.
Got more of these in.
January 29, 2026 at 3:46 PM
Chipotle is working with surveillance company Palantir to build a “food safety risk platform.”

Should you be worried Palantir might be tracking how much guacamole you add to your burrito? Maybe not.

But you should be worried about what it’s doing for the federal government.
The Most Dangerous Corporation in America?
The AI surveillance state is real — and it's being built by Palantir.
www.youtube.com
September 18, 2026 at 9:30 PM