* Well, almost. I had a discussion on that a few weeks ago. The other person considered randomization "surrender"🤷
* Well, almost. I had a discussion on that a few weeks ago. The other person considered randomization "surrender"🤷
🧬 Mendelian Randomization — Mendelian randomization (MR) is a causal-inference method in genetic epidemiology that uses germline genetic variants as instrumental variables to distinguish true modifiable causal risk factors from…
https://crvscience.com/wiki/mendelian-randomization
🧬 Mendelian Randomization — Mendelian randomization (MR) is a causal-inference method in genetic epidemiology that uses germline genetic variants as instrumental variables to distinguish true modifiable causal risk factors from…
https://crvscience.com/wiki/mendelian-randomization
Figuring out how basic did randomization was like the biggest hurdle.
foxcouncil.com/dopewars/
Figuring out how basic did randomization was like the biggest hurdle.
foxcouncil.com/dopewars/
Seeds is a Max for Live clone of Mutable Instruments Beads with a few extra features.
It has a modular patch bay, pitch quantizer with note exclusion and randomization system.
FREE DOWNLOAD!
#ableton
Seeds is a Max for Live clone of Mutable Instruments Beads with a few extra features.
It has a modular patch bay, pitch quantizer with note exclusion and randomization system.
FREE DOWNLOAD!
#ableton
github.com/graygooglitc...
github.com/graygooglitc...
🧬 Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization (IVW, MR-Egger Pleiotropy & Weighted Median) Calibration: Native Rust vs. SciPy Across 12 Human Genetic Instrument Cohorts — We benchmark our native Rust 4-stage Two-Sample Mendelian Rand…
https://crvscience.com/labs/discoveries/mr-twas-scipy
🧬 Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization (IVW, MR-Egger Pleiotropy & Weighted Median) Calibration: Native Rust vs. SciPy Across 12 Human Genetic Instrument Cohorts — We benchmark our native Rust 4-stage Two-Sample Mendelian Rand…
https://crvscience.com/labs/discoveries/mr-twas-scipy
@sarahscire.com explains the test for @niemanlab.org.
@sarahscire.com explains the test for @niemanlab.org.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used publicly available GWAS summary statistics. TMD data were from Finn Gen R13 (23,035 cases; 477,151 controls). (🧵 2/6)
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used publicly available GWAS summary statistics. TMD data were from Finn Gen R13 (23,035 cases; 477,151 controls). (🧵 2/6)
like there just isnt a clear line between art that uses some form of computer generated randomization and ai art
i dont think something being labelled as art makes it better or worse than something not considered art
like there just isnt a clear line between art that uses some form of computer generated randomization and ai art
i dont think something being labelled as art makes it better or worse than something not considered art
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366817v1
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366817v1
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-11190555/latest
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-11190555/latest