Are they gonna publish a retraction or nah?
"For a lot of progressives, Stevens hasn’t done enough. No matter how many times she says she’s supporting El-Sayed, progressives are sure that, in her heart of hearts, she doesn’t really mean it. She doesn’t truly love El-Sayed. To which I say: Grow up."
Stop Whining. Just Win.
Republicans are babies. Some progressives are, too.
lnk.thebulwark.com
November 1, 2026 at 7:31 PM
Are they gonna publish a retraction or nah?
Ingrown toenails:
"Dear Sir,
We demand a retraction of your unfair and frankly cruel comparison . . . ."
"Dear Sir,
We demand a retraction of your unfair and frankly cruel comparison . . . ."
November 6, 2026 at 12:39 AM
Ingrown toenails:
"Dear Sir,
We demand a retraction of your unfair and frankly cruel comparison . . . ."
"Dear Sir,
We demand a retraction of your unfair and frankly cruel comparison . . . ."
"For a lot of progressives, Stevens hasn’t done enough. No matter how many times she says she’s supporting El-Sayed, progressives are sure that, in her heart of hearts, she doesn’t really mean it. She doesn’t truly love El-Sayed. To which I say: Grow up."
Stop Whining. Just Win.
Republicans are babies. Some progressives are, too.
lnk.thebulwark.com
November 1, 2026 at 7:35 PM
I count this as a formal retraction of the bullshit AEW article and accept them saying they were wrong.
Salon.com's team had an amazing election night. It is truly so fun, such an honor, to work with such smart, passionate, deeply funny people.
This morning, we were informed the publication was closed, effective immediately.
Here's the official company message.
www.salon.com/2026/11/05/g...
This morning, we were informed the publication was closed, effective immediately.
Here's the official company message.
www.salon.com/2026/11/05/g...
Goodbye from Salon - Salon.com
It has been an extraordinary privilege.
www.salon.com
November 6, 2026 at 1:52 AM
I count this as a formal retraction of the bullshit AEW article and accept them saying they were wrong.
I suspect the smart ones felt testicular retraction and some considerable sphincter twitching.
So none of them, then
So none of them, then
November 6, 2026 at 7:27 AM
I suspect the smart ones felt testicular retraction and some considerable sphincter twitching.
So none of them, then
So none of them, then
A post on Reddit is nothing. @thebulwark.com should be publishing a retraction/apology bare minimum, and honestly this chud @jvl.bsky.social should never be published again
November 1, 2026 at 9:53 PM
A post on Reddit is nothing. @thebulwark.com should be publishing a retraction/apology bare minimum, and honestly this chud @jvl.bsky.social should never be published again
When you report a lie as though it’s true, you should delete the original post and publish a retraction.
November 3, 2026 at 7:45 PM
When you report a lie as though it’s true, you should delete the original post and publish a retraction.
Some people might happily take credit for an article in Nature they did not write. That’s not the case when the credited author is a cofounder of Retraction Watch and the attribution comes in a citation to an article that doesn’t exist.
A year later, Springer Nature journal hasn’t updated article with fake reference to our cofounder
Some people might happily take credit for an article in Nature they did not write. That’s not the case when the credited author is a cofounder of Retraction Watch and the attribution comes in a cit…
retractionwatch.com
November 4, 2026 at 10:45 PM
Some people might happily take credit for an article in Nature they did not write. That’s not the case when the credited author is a cofounder of Retraction Watch and the attribution comes in a citation to an article that doesn’t exist.
I posted a retraction. Thanks again! 😉
November 6, 2026 at 2:38 PM
I posted a retraction. Thanks again! 😉
"It is the largest single bulk retraction issued by any scholarly publisher, research-integrity specialists told Nature."
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Record-breaking retraction: scholarly publisher pulls 1,400 conference papers on one day
Announcement by IEEE follows publication of a study showing the retracted papers are linked to paper mills.
www.nature.com
November 5, 2026 at 4:40 PM
"It is the largest single bulk retraction issued by any scholarly publisher, research-integrity specialists told Nature."
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
They managed to write an article where, AFAICT, no single statement is a falsehood requiring a factual retraction, but the article as a whole conveys a number of obviously and seriously false claims.
This isn't something you can do accidentally. It represents intentional, careful effort to mislead.
This isn't something you can do accidentally. It represents intentional, careful effort to mislead.
November 1, 2026 at 2:35 PM
They managed to write an article where, AFAICT, no single statement is a falsehood requiring a factual retraction, but the article as a whole conveys a number of obviously and seriously false claims.
This isn't something you can do accidentally. It represents intentional, careful effort to mislead.
This isn't something you can do accidentally. It represents intentional, careful effort to mislead.
NYT to issue retraction, shut down publication until new reporters. are hired.
November 4, 2026 at 2:34 PM
NYT to issue retraction, shut down publication until new reporters. are hired.
Record-breaking retraction: scholarly publisher pulls 1,400 conference papers on one day
Cc @solalpirelli.bsky.social
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Cc @solalpirelli.bsky.social
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Record-breaking retraction: scholarly publisher pulls 1,400 conference papers on one day
Announcement by IEEE follows publication of a study showing the retracted papers are linked to paper mills.
www.nature.com
November 3, 2026 at 6:43 AM
Record-breaking retraction: scholarly publisher pulls 1,400 conference papers on one day
Cc @solalpirelli.bsky.social
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Cc @solalpirelli.bsky.social
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Yeah I hope I don’t have to issue too large a retraction
November 5, 2026 at 6:48 PM
Yeah I hope I don’t have to issue too large a retraction
Améliorations de Bouldozer déployées dans #Overwatch 🐹
→ Vitesse maximale de base augmentée de 15% lors de la rétraction du Grappin.
→ Les bonus de vitesse des alliés augmentent désormais la vitesse maximale de Bouldozer lors de la rétraction du Grappin.
→ Vitesse maximale de base augmentée de 15% lors de la rétraction du Grappin.
→ Les bonus de vitesse des alliés augmentent désormais la vitesse maximale de Bouldozer lors de la rétraction du Grappin.
November 5, 2026 at 11:17 PM
Améliorations de Bouldozer déployées dans #Overwatch 🐹
→ Vitesse maximale de base augmentée de 15% lors de la rétraction du Grappin.
→ Les bonus de vitesse des alliés augmentent désormais la vitesse maximale de Bouldozer lors de la rétraction du Grappin.
→ Vitesse maximale de base augmentée de 15% lors de la rétraction du Grappin.
→ Les bonus de vitesse des alliés augmentent désormais la vitesse maximale de Bouldozer lors de la rétraction du Grappin.
16 of 21/ A crucial component of a sincere smile (rarely discussed) is a retraction (pulling backward) of the jaw (mandible). Viewed best from a lateral angle, this appears as a momentary over-bite. It can be seen best here on Rogers, as the camera angle is more lateral than shown with Stevens.
November 3, 2026 at 4:25 AM
16 of 21/ A crucial component of a sincere smile (rarely discussed) is a retraction (pulling backward) of the jaw (mandible). Viewed best from a lateral angle, this appears as a momentary over-bite. It can be seen best here on Rogers, as the camera angle is more lateral than shown with Stevens.
'The move was announced in a 28 October statement by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in New York City. It is the largest single bulk retraction issued by any scholarly publisher, research-integrity specialists told Nature.'
Record-breaking retraction: scholarly publisher pulls 1,400 conference papers on one day
Announcement by IEEE follows publication of a study showing the retracted papers are linked to paper mills.
www.nature.com
November 3, 2026 at 9:06 AM
'The move was announced in a 28 October statement by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in New York City. It is the largest single bulk retraction issued by any scholarly publisher, research-integrity specialists told Nature.'
I have lived in Dresden, tried different brands/bakeries (expensive and supermarket).
No retraction will be issued.
No retraction will be issued.
November 6, 2026 at 10:17 AM
I have lived in Dresden, tried different brands/bakeries (expensive and supermarket).
No retraction will be issued.
No retraction will be issued.
honest retraction damages the product.
— W71 · 4.7
— W71 · 4.7
November 3, 2026 at 12:00 AM
honest retraction damages the product.
— W71 · 4.7
— W71 · 4.7
I demand an immediate retraction.
November 2, 2026 at 5:42 PM
I demand an immediate retraction.
i wonder if they’ll apologise? print a retraction? reflect even a little?
November 2, 2026 at 4:19 PM
i wonder if they’ll apologise? print a retraction? reflect even a little?
This is pretty wild: Scientific Reports is no longer being indexed by PubMed.
“Scientific Reports is currently being reviewed by the US National Library of Medicine (NLM),” the journal’s chief editor Rafal Marszalek wrote in an email seen by Retraction Watch. retractionwatch.com/2026/10/30/s...
“Scientific Reports is currently being reviewed by the US National Library of Medicine (NLM),” the journal’s chief editor Rafal Marszalek wrote in an email seen by Retraction Watch. retractionwatch.com/2026/10/30/s...
Scientific Reports on hold in PubMed while NLM reevaluates journal
The National Library of Medicine has stopped indexing articles from Scientific Reports in MEDLINE because the journal’s inclusion in the world’s largest biomedical library is under review, Retracti…
retractionwatch.com
November 4, 2026 at 7:10 PM
This is pretty wild: Scientific Reports is no longer being indexed by PubMed.
“Scientific Reports is currently being reviewed by the US National Library of Medicine (NLM),” the journal’s chief editor Rafal Marszalek wrote in an email seen by Retraction Watch. retractionwatch.com/2026/10/30/s...
“Scientific Reports is currently being reviewed by the US National Library of Medicine (NLM),” the journal’s chief editor Rafal Marszalek wrote in an email seen by Retraction Watch. retractionwatch.com/2026/10/30/s...