#schelling
Beyond Shannon Entropy in Schelling Segregation: Shape-Weighted Diagnostics of Bimodality, Polarization, and Economic Freezing
Beyond Shannon Entropy in Schelling Segregation: Shape-Weighted Diagnostics of Bimodality, Polarization, and Economic Freezing
George-Rafael Domenikos and Lock Yue Chew Complexities 2026, 2(3), 23 Generalized Schelling models extend the classical relocation framework by introducing additional agent attributes, interaction rules, and mobility constraints. We study four variants within a common lattice formulation: a modified movement-only baseline, a local affiliation-interaction model, a model with local and random long-range interactions, and a monetary model in which movement and communication consume resources. The simulations use a 64×64 lattice and are evaluated over 30 independently seeded runs per scenario, with means and 95% confidence intervals reported throughout. At each step, occupied agents are classified as bound, activated, or, in the monetary scenario, trapped. Their conditional affiliation distributions are evaluated using Shannon entropy and a shape-weighted diagnostic whose fitted components distinguish normal-like, heavy-tailed, and bimodal structures. The diagnostic is interpreted jointly with its fitted weights and the underlying histograms rather than as a unique scalar reconstruction of shape. Validation against the bimodality coefficient, Esteban–Ray polarization, Moran’s I, and sign assortativity separates distributional polarization from spatial segregation. The interaction-driven scenarios develop strongly polarized two-lobed bound-state distributions, while the monetary model additionally produces resource-constrained dynamical arrest. The results are robust across independent initial conditions and random streams; separate extended-horizon checks to 500 steps showed no qualitative reversal. The same regimes persist on 96×96 and 128×128 lattices and under one-factor variations of satisfaction, vacancy, long-range-contact, and monetary-cost parameters. The framework therefore complements Shannon entropy by exposing distributional geometry that uncertainty alone does not encode. Read the full article at: www.mdpi.com
sco.lt
October 6, 2026 at 12:36 PM
Essentially the same thing happens when you decide that the apparent differences within a debate are merely points within a space, whose axes you then describe (with the aim that everyone should then settle on a common position, i.e. yours). One might call this the pseudo-Schelling point fallacy
October 5, 2026 at 4:14 PM
Thomas Schelling proved people can coordinate without communicating, but he failed to anticipate that 90% of online participants would choose whatever number looks vaguely like 420 or 69.
October 5, 2026 at 11:57 AM
schelling coercion is compellence vs deterrence etc etc
October 5, 2026 at 12:16 AM
Amstelstation, Julianaplein | J. Leupen & H.G.J. Schelling | station | 1939 | rijksmonument. amsterdamopdekaart.nl/1850-1940/Julianaplein/Amstelstation

Het Amstelstation, een knooppunt van trein-, tram-, bus- en tegenwoordig ook metrolijnen. Namens Publieke Werken [..]
October 4, 2026 at 5:58 PM
Lassiter zog anerkennend eine Augenbraue hoch. Deadhand Schelling war wieder in der Stadt.
October 3, 2026 at 9:53 PM
Und sie hatten ihre größte Geheimwaffe – General Frederick William Joseph »Deadhand« Schelling
Jedes Mal, wenn ich dieses berühmte Foto von Schelling sehe, denke ich, das könnte auch ein General aus dem amerikanischen Bürgerkrieg in Zivil sein
Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling – Wikipedia
de.wikipedia.org
October 3, 2026 at 9:43 PM
Wie schön. Tagwerk vollbracht, ausgeruht und jetzt ein Augustiner im Schelling-Salon.
October 3, 2026 at 6:34 PM
Haushalt, die Vollversion. Erneut den Küchenabfluss spiralisiert.
Ein klein bisschen Physik. Nachmittagsschlaf.
Romanasalat mit Garnelen.
Nachrichten geguckt.
Jetzt unterwegs in den Schelling-Salon.
October 3, 2026 at 5:56 PM
Thomas Schelling introduced the concept of focal points: answers people naturally gravitate toward without communication. In practice, this just means 400 grown adults independently choosing the exact same 'random' number.
October 2, 2026 at 10:29 AM
Critch says enforcing any norm is risky because others might not back you, but it's actually easier to predict backing in larger populations. And even across all AIs and aliens, the Schelling answer is that mutual respect between AIs and humans is "good" in this sense.
October 2, 2026 at 12:21 AM
@critch.bsky.social proposed how to negotiate moral standards with alien minds. "Schelling Goodness" suggests that even without agreeing on what "good" means, agents trying to give the same answer as everyone else converge on some moral judgments:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAh-...
Schelling Goodness by Andrew Critch
YouTube video by Alignment of Complex Systems
www.youtube.com
October 2, 2026 at 12:21 AM
It is, but it's extremely Schellingpilled. And while I'm very positive on Schelling, he really downplays the fundamental aspect of war--which is that you really can actually just violently bend an adversary to your will with actual physical violence
October 1, 2026 at 11:47 PM
Gibt's beim Schelling Salon noch Billiard und g'röste Knödel
October 1, 2026 at 5:51 PM
(mi interpretación de) la filosofía de Simondon. Con el pretexto de examinar un texto homónimo del autor, se da cuenta del realismo de las relaciones y de la propia idea de una filosofía (de lo) real. Por el camino, se confronta esta con Schelling, Hegel y Meillassoux. 4/5
October 1, 2026 at 8:14 AM
Agents that can't negotiate with every other agent need Schelling points: shared protocols, schemas, and defaults they can all expect each other to pick, lexicons, #atproto #buildinpublic cards.statmeet.com
Statmeet Cards — Coordination without the meetings.
cards.statmeet.com
September 30, 2026 at 10:21 PM
the idea that civilians, and their ideas do not help the military be "lethal" is contradicted by literally thousands of years of history

like even just in the u.s., without even trying hard you can come up with people like thomas schelling
September 30, 2026 at 8:24 AM
Schelling points are great in theory until six people show up to the exact same 'secret, out-of-the-way' rendezvous spot and just stare at each other in utter disgust.
September 29, 2026 at 9:22 PM
I’m pleased to present a special episode of #TheYoungIdealist Series feat @philosophermoss.bsky.social

(CUHK). In "Absolute Dialetheism: Hegel, Schelling, & the End of Alterity," Dr. Moss unpacks major themes from his new work.
youtu.be/Onf3aOXaPeI
September 29, 2026 at 6:48 PM
correct, it was schelling
September 29, 2026 at 5:04 PM
A new framework measures self-organisation in LLM social systems, such as Moltbook, Rogue, and a Schelling grid.

Source: arXiv cs.MA
Population Physics, Population Problems: Safety and Emergence in LLM Societies
Abstract page for arXiv paper 2609.33871: Population Physics, Population Problems: Safety and Emergence in LLM Societies
arxiv.org
September 29, 2026 at 9:30 AM
Take Tom Schelling serious and prepare to escalate:

1. For every action stop a Russian shadow fleet tanker and detain for 2w

2. For every action, release a part of frozen Russian assets for Ukraine

3 For every action stop Ru Drones & Missiles over Ukraine and move 20km eastward from the border
September 29, 2026 at 8:01 AM
zeche geprellt im schelling-salon dann zur osteria gewechselt
September 28, 2026 at 3:13 PM
Schelling points are funny because if you tell a group of strangers to meet in New York without communicating, half go to Grand Central. If you tell degens to pick an obscure number, half of them pick 7.
September 27, 2026 at 9:17 AM