They believed that holding Trump accountable would seem partisan, and they would impress voters by moving on and focusing on policy.
They believed that holding Trump accountable would seem partisan, and they would impress voters by moving on and focusing on policy.
Here’s what we do know, though: voting publics are not predictably responding to material conditions.
Until we figure out what they ARE responding to, we cannot insulate ourselves from cyclical backlash with any degree of certainty.
But SOMETHING is definitely weird about the info environment.
Here’s what we do know, though: voting publics are not predictably responding to material conditions.
Until we figure out what they ARE responding to, we cannot insulate ourselves from cyclical backlash with any degree of certainty.
Using the term “getting even” is de facto complicity - it attempts to turn necessary and mandatory legal accountability into an emotionally-driven “choice”
IMO, for whatever reasons (I won’t speculate), Jeffries is using disingenuous language to support COMPLICITY
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who is now poised to become the next House Speaker, says that Democrats will focus on affordability concerns and not retribution after their midterm wins.
Using the term “getting even” is de facto complicity - it attempts to turn necessary and mandatory legal accountability into an emotionally-driven “choice”
IMO, for whatever reasons (I won’t speculate), Jeffries is using disingenuous language to support COMPLICITY