#steinem
In this Patreon-exclusive episode, Talia and Emma discuss Gloria Steinem: her legacy, her place in the feminist movement, and her writings. They ask what it means to honestly reckon with feminism's history of transphobia and exclusion, as typified by Gloria Steinem's infamous essay "Transsexualism".
Rocky Potter Feminist Show: Gloria Steinem's "Transsexualism" | Cracked Ivory
Rocky Potter Feminist Show: Gloria Steinem's "Transsexualism" by Cracked Ivory on Patreon. Join Cracked Ivory's community for exclusive content and updates.
www.patreon.com
September 29, 2026 at 1:51 PM
Por qué el feminismo no es solo una lucha por los derechos de las mujeres Gloria Steinem, icono del feminismo estadounidense y fundadora de la revista Ms., a quien durante décadas se presentó como símbolo de independencia y de la lucha por la
September 29, 2026 at 1:23 PM
All pain patients are hated by doctors and we hate them right back.

They won't treat pain because they're too afraid, poor little dears.
September 29, 2026 at 12:05 PM
El #blogEspacioVioleta , disponible en nuestra web, publica hoy un artículo sobre Gloria Steinem. ¿Conocías su obra? ✍️

+info: biblioteca.ulpgc.es/blogs/espaci...
Gloria Steinem | Biblioteca ULPGC
La Biblioteca de la ULPGC es un centro de recursos para el aprendizaje, la docencia, la investigación y las actividades relacionadas con el funcionamiento y la gestión de la ULPGC.
biblioteca.ulpgc.es
September 29, 2026 at 12:01 PM
💜 Para honrar la memoria de Gloria Steinem—periodista, activista y referente de la segunda ola feminista—, te invitamos a repasar brevemente su historia. Su fallecimiento no es el final de su ruta, sino una oportunidad para recordar el impacto de su legado por la igualdad.
September 29, 2026 at 12:01 PM
𝖧𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖾𝖿𝗌. 𝖮𝗇𝖾 𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖦𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖲𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗁𝖺𝖽 𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗀 𝗋𝗈𝗅𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘤 𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘤 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 ’𝟪𝟢𝗌 & 𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗒 '𝟫𝟢𝗌 & 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗂𝗆𝗌 𝗌𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖾𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗉𝗍𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴, 𝗈𝖿𝗍𝖾𝗇 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗄𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾.
𝖹𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌. 𝖧𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗎𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗈𝗋𝗒.
September 29, 2026 at 11:28 AM
Opinion: The ‘famous last words’ I’d like to hear now
Gloria Steinem didn’t filter her opinions. The famed feminist who said “a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle” was, at the very least, honest. Which is why it’s odd she chose to appear on the Netflix series “Famous Last Words,” which records interviews with celebrities that get released after their deaths. In her interview, Steinem said things like she wants to “perpetuate what we hope is a global democracy” and that “the most important thing we can do for each other (is) to know each other through stories.” Finally, she advised people to “do what you love — (and) to be, also, the unique person you are.” Did she really have to wait until she was dead to convey those banal sentiments? Probably not. But there are definitely other folks out there who are keeping their cards close to their vests, not telling anyone what they really think. I’d like to nominate some of them for “Famous Last Words.” It’s true that, in keeping quiet about certain subjects, some people are just being polite. No, you don’t have to tell us what you really think of your mother-in-law. Even after you’re dead, we probably don’t care. And there are some who are concerned about losing their jobs. No need to insult your boss. The people I’d really like to hear from, though, are those with considerable amounts of job security and power who nevertheless keep their mouths shut about what they really think. Last year, for instance, I received a call from the leader of a large foundation. We chatted about why conversations about child welfare seemed so unproductive. “You know,” she said, “between you and me, maybe we overemphasized the importance of ‘lived experience.’” “Really?” I replied, somewhat dumbfounded. Opinion: The college students who need to self-soothe Having sat through innumerable meetings where one participant’s main qualification was that he or she had spent time in foster care — and who took any mention of data or research that didn’t exactly mirror his or her own experience as a personal attack — I couldn’t have agreed more. But if you try to discount “lived experience” publicly, or suggest that one person’s story should not be weighed in the same way as population-level data, then you’ll be attacked as insensitive, or more likely, a racist. Of course, it was at least conceivable that this philanthropic leader could be fired for speaking her mind. The same is not true for all the tenured university faculty who refuse to say what they really think. One argument for tenure has always been that it allows professors to pursue the truth in research and teaching and to go against the grain of public opinion without fear that they will lose their jobs. But universities have become hubs of groupthink. It turns out that even if they can say what they want without getting fired, most faculty still don’t want to become social pariahs. Just look at the recent spate of reports that have come from Cornell, Yale and Harvard. These reports acknowledge that there has been a decline in the public’s trust of higher education, that maybe there is not enough free speech on campus, and that it’s not helpful for the university administration to issue political statements. If you had asked Ivy League faculty about these issues in 2020, the answer would have been much different. The fevered pitch of DEI ideology would have ensured the silence of any dissenters. We lived through 'Woke 1.' Should you be afraid of 'Woke 2'? In a recent column in The New York Times, Carlos Lozada asks people who have acknowledged that “Woke 1 was crazy” exactly how they arrived at Woke 2. “Before that time goes farther down the memory hole, discarded as just one of so many vibe shifts,” he asks the “formerly woke”: “If you can dismiss it so casually now — all the defunding and abolishing, the BIPOCing and Latinxing, the canceling and decentering and my truthing — how much of it did you truly believe at the time? How much was conviction, how much was a pose, how much was groupthink, how much was fear?” Almost none of it was conviction, of course. Everything was virtue signaling and fear of being on the outs with their cohort. And the elites, the people with the most power and money and security, were among the worst offenders. They could have stopped the ride or at least stuck their foot out to slow it down anytime they wanted. But they chose not to. If you want to know what these folks really think, you have to wait until the fever breaks. Or until they’re dead.
www.deseret.com
September 29, 2026 at 10:50 AM
Gloria Steinem, trailblazer and feminist icon, lived in a Manhattan brownstone for over 50 years. It was a maximalist space described as a "magical house."
Souvenirs, Art, And An Alcove Bed: Gloria Steinem's NYC Brownstone Was Like 'Another World' - The List
www.thelist.com
September 29, 2026 at 8:32 AM
"America is an enormous frosted cupcake in the middle of millions of starving people."

Gloria Steinem,
(1934~2026)
September 28, 2026 at 11:18 PM
BRIEF COMMENT
Looks like my callouts of the glaring omissions of Dolly Parton and Gloria Steinem—women connected to Tucson via, respectively, the local Imagination Library branch and Steinem having appeared at the Unitarian Universalist Church—were enough to steer David Hoffmann away from the Star.
September 28, 2026 at 11:16 PM
Join us on Friday for The Last Girl Awards, recognizing global changemakers redefining what freedom means. Celebrate this year’s honorees Janet Jensen, Rebecca Zipkin, Liz Stein and Vandana Shiva; enjoy a performance by Martha Redbone; and pay tribute to Gloria Steinem, one of the awards’ champions.
The Last Girl Awards
Join us for a conversation and reception with top human rights activists, artists and writers: a rare and inspiring opportunity to be in the room with global changemakers redefining what freedom…
asiasociety.org
September 28, 2026 at 10:45 PM
"I offer none of this as a defense of Israel, Zionism, or Steinem. I have vigorous criticisms of all three"

What bothers you about Gur's post is not that "it DOES antisemitism", lol.

What bothers you is that he nailed your ass to the wall. 😭
September 28, 2026 at 9:28 PM
Him: "I am not defending Steinem or the horrors committed by Israel here.

Arrested Development Narrator: "He was."
September 28, 2026 at 9:14 PM
If [Gur is commenting on the link that Steinem HERSELF made], then [Gur is not the one making the link].

Have you been kicked in the head by TWO mules today?
September 28, 2026 at 8:58 PM
"The post says Steinem is bad. The evidence it highlights — the only part most people on Facebook will see on their feeds — is her saying “wherever there is antisemitism, I identify as a Jew”.

False. The full post gives the argument.

This is a bad faith, poorly supported charge, JK.
September 28, 2026 at 8:48 PM
I am familiar with all of those terms, yes.

I am not defending Steinem or the horrors committed by Israel here.
I offer none of this as a defense of Israel, Zionism, or Steinem. I have vigorous criticisms of all three, there are other criticisms I disagree with but respect. None of that is relevant to my point.

My point is how that headline image on that Facebook post DOES antisemitism.
September 28, 2026 at 8:44 PM
I do not need everyone to agree with me about registering antisemitism in that post about Steinem … or anything.

But people showing up in my mentions to DISMISS concerns from someone like me as nothing other than a defense of Israel reflect an attitude which opens a door to antisemitic entryism.
A contribution to left renewal and transformation
leftrenewal.net
September 28, 2026 at 8:33 PM
I offer none of this as a defense of Israel, Zionism, or Steinem. I have vigorous criticisms of all three, there are other criticisms I disagree with but respect. None of that is relevant to my point.

My point is how that headline image on that Facebook post DOES antisemitism.
September 28, 2026 at 8:33 PM
The post says Steinem is bad. The evidence it highlights — the only part most people on Facebook will see on their feeds — is her saying “wherever there is antisemitism, I identify as a Jew”.

The antisemitic implication is that opposing antisemitism and identifying as Jewish are bad.
September 28, 2026 at 8:33 PM
The full post faults Steinem as a supporter of western imperialism in general, and Zionism in particular. That critique is not necessarily antisemitic.

But making the most prominent element the quotation “wherever there is antisemitism, I identify as a Jew” IS antisemitic. Why is it there?
Gloria Steinem Was First and Foremost a Zionist. Not Incidentally. Not Reluctantly. Not As a Private Detail Sitting Beside an Otherwise Progressive Life.
Gloria Steinem was a committed liberal Zionist who spent decades defending the israeli state,
theantizionist.substack.com
September 28, 2026 at 8:33 PM
Steinem was first and foremost a capitalism and worked for the CIA to make sure that feminism wasn't 'infected' with class consciousness. It's why after all these decades US feminism is still a weaker, less effective movement than in much of the rest of the world.
September 28, 2026 at 8:18 PM
It's not irrelevant at all. It quite clearly undermines your charge.

Which might be why you want to keep it out of the thread.

Steinem used claims of antisemitism to defend Israel, a Jewish supremacist state. She's using her Jewishness to defend a racist position. Her Jewishness is relevant.
September 28, 2026 at 7:56 PM
My criticism of that post is not a defense of either Zionism or Steinem
I do not want to prevent anyone from seeing the full post. But it is irrelevant to my point about how it appeared on people’s Facebook feeds.
September 28, 2026 at 7:52 PM
It may well be a response to The Times of Israel post here.

blogs.timesofisrael.com/gloria-stein...
The Blogs: Gloria Steinem: Activist, Feminist, Zionist
From the blog of Karen Lieberman at The Times of Israel
blogs.timesofisrael.com
September 28, 2026 at 7:47 PM