#technocacy
LightNews LightNews
kmarieblackxo.bsky.social
Starting to think the #technocacy were just goofball dorks that read too much #JeffNoon 🫩🤦🏻‍♀️🤖
October 20, 2026 at 11:08 PM
techlinear.bsky.social
Appears likely he's a #CIA-owned, cardboard cutout. He's simply the public face for his owners and masters .... his purpose is to deceive the young into going along with the #technocacy and #UN #Agenda2030 goals to enslave the entire world with #UBI, #digitalID, #CBDCs, and #15minutecities
October 11, 2026 at 8:47 PM
berrybunny.bsky.social
and Peter Thiel subscribes to "Dark Enlightenment" which is a technocratic neonazi movement... that maternal grandfather... founded "Technocacy, Inc" to promote "Dark Enlightenment"
And Peter Thiel is basically solely responsible for the couch humper even being in politics.
March 24, 2025 at 8:29 AM
denniesue.bsky.social
I was wondering why no one has brought up Technocacy. It seems to me that Trump is attempting to establish the Technate of North America. This would include the US, Canada, Mexico, Greenland, the Caribbean, Venezuela, Columbia, Guyana, etc. Peter Thiel, JD Vance's sugar daddy, is a big proponent.
January 6, 2026 at 5:44 AM
symbo1ics.bsky.social
Roszak called it the "technocacy" (in 1968!) bsky.app/profile/symb...
symbo1ics.bsky.social Linotype Pilgrim @symbo1ics.bsky.social · Apr 15
Theodore Roszak, The Making of a Counter Culture (1968)
extract from page 16: Thus: We call it "education," the "life of the mind," the "pursuit of the truth." But it is a matter of machine-tooling the young to the needs of our various baroque bureaucracies: corporate, governmental, military, trade union, educational. We call it "free enterprise." But it is a vastly restrictive system of oligopolistic market manipulation, tied by institutionalized corruption to the greatest munitions boondoggle in history and dedicated to infantilizing the public by turning it into a herd of compulsive consumers. We call it "creative leisure": finger painting and ceramics in the university extension, tropic holidays, grand athletic excursions to the far mountains and the sunny beaches of the earth. But it is, like our sexual longings, an expensive adjunct of careerist high-achievement: the prize that goes to the dependable hireling. We call it "pluralism." But it is a matter of the public authorities solemnly affirming everybody's right to his own opinion as an excuse for ignoring anybody's troubling challenge. In such a pluralism, critical viewpoints become mere private prayers offered at the altar of an inconsequential conception of free speech. We call it "democracy." But it is a matter of opinion polling in whch a "random sample" is asked to nod or wag the head in response to a set of prefabricated alternatives, usually related to the _faits accompli_ of decision makers, who can always construe the polls to serve their own ends. Thus, if 80 per cent think it is a "mistake" that we ever "went into" Vietnam, but 51 per cent think we would "lose prestige" is we "pulled out now," then the "people" have been "consulted" and the war goes on with their "approval." page 17, extract: We call it "debate." But it is a matter of arranging staged encounters between equally noncommittal candidates neatly tailored to fit thirty minutes of prime network time, the object of the exercise being to establish an "image" of competence. If there are interrogators present, they have been hand-picked and their questions rehearsed. We call it "government by the consent of the governed." But even now, somewhere in the labyrinth of the paramilitary agences an "area specialist" neither you nor I elected is dispatching "special advisors" to a distance "trouble spot" which will be the next Vietnam. And somewhere in the depths of the oceans a submarine commander neither you nor I elected is piloting a craft equipped with firepower capable of cataclysmic devastation and perhaps trying to decide if—for reasons neither you nor I know—the time has come to push the button. It is all called being "free," being "happy," being the Great Society. From the standpoint of the traditional left, the vices of contemporary America we mention here are easily explained—and indeed too easily. The evils stem simply from the unrestricted pursuit of profit. Behind the manipulative deceptions there are capitalist desperados holding up the society for all the loot they can lay hands on. To be sure, the desperados are there, and they are a plague of the society. For a capitalist technocracy, profiteering will always be a central incentive and major corrupting influence. Yet even in our society, profit taking no longer holds its primacy as an evidence of organizational success, as one might suspect if for no other reason than that our largest industrial enterprises can now safely count on an uninterrupted stream of comfortably high earnings. At this point, considerations of an entirely different order come into play page 18, extract: …among the managers, as Seymour Melman reminds us when he observes: > The "fixed" nature of industrial investment represented by machinery and structures means that large parts of the costs of any accounting period must be assigned in an arbitrary way. Hence, the magnitude of the profits shown in any accounting period varies entirely according to the regulations made by the management itself for assigning its "fixed" charges. Hence, profit has ceased to be the economists' independent measure of success or failure of the enterprise. We can define the systematic quality in the behavior and management of large industrial enterprises not in terms of profits, but in terms of their acting to maintain or to extend the production decision power they wield. Production decision power can be gauged by the number of people employed, or whose work is directed, by the proportion of given markets that a management dominates, by the size of the capital investment that is controlled, by the number of other managements whose decisions are controlled. Toward these ends profits are an instrumental device—subordinated in given accounting periods to the extension of decision power.[6] Which is to say that capitalist enterprise now enters the stage at which large-scale social integration and control become paramount interests in and of themselves: the corporations begin to behave like public authorities concerned with rationalizing the total economy. If profit remains an important lubricant of the system, we should recognize that other systems may very well use different lubricants to achieve the same end of perfected, centralized organization. But in so doing they still constitute _technocratic_ systems drawing upon their own inducements. [6] Seymour Melman, "Priorities and the State Machine," New University Thought, Winter 1966–67, pp. 17–18.
May 17, 2025 at 4:37 PM
fagmedia.bsky.social
The digital ID is just a data harvesting exercise - getting ready for the coming technocacy?
February 23, 2026 at 11:44 AM