#wikileaks
LightNews LightNews
teapainusa.bsky.social
We need a WikiLeaks for the #EpsteinFiles, don’t we?
September 27, 2025 at 3:16 AM
sundaedivine.lol
Who needs Wikileaks when you have Whiskey Leaks?
Hegseth leaked classified information to his wife and brother.
April 21, 2025 at 10:02 AM
marisakabas.bsky.social
comparing it to wikileaks is actually batshit
phillewis.bsky.social Phil Lewis @phillewis.bsky.social · Jul 4
Patrick Healy, NYT assistant managing editor for Standards and Trust, wrote a thread on how the Zohran Mamdani/Columbia story came together:
First post: As the @nytimes assistant managing editor for Standards and Trust, I’ve received reader feedback regarding our reporting on Zohran Mamdani’s 2009 application to Columbia University. To provide context on how the reporting came together, I wanted to share some information: 2nd post: The Times has been reporting comprehensively on Mr. Mamdani’s proposals for the city, his vision on the economy and affordability, his leadership record and his personal background, including his biography and South Asian heritage that he’s talked about during his campaign. Third post: Times journalists for decades have done deep reporting on major party nominees for New York's mayor to provide insight, context and texture about their priorities, history and evolution. Our reporting helps readers better understand how candidates think and what they believe. 4th post: Our reporters obtained information about Mr. Mamdani’s Columbia college application and went to the Mamdani campaign with it. When we hear anything of news value, we try to confirm it through direct sources. Mr. Mamdani confirmed this information in an interview with The Times. 5th post: Mr. Mamdani shared his thinking about the limitations of identity boxes on forms like Columbia’s, and explained how he wrote in “Uganda,” the country of his birth – the kind of decision many people with overlapping identities have wrestled with when confronted with such boxes. 6th post: We believe Mr. Mamdani’s thinking and decision-making, laid out in his words, was newsworthy and in line with our mission to help readers better know and understand top candidates for major offices. 7th post: We sometimes receive information that has been hacked or from controversial sources. The Times does not solely rely on nor make a decision to publish information from such a source; we seek to confirm through direct sources, which we did with Mr. Mamdani. 8th post: Sometimes sources have their own motives or obtain information using means we wouldn't, like Trump's taxes, Wikileaks or Edward Snowden. It’s important to share what we can about sourcing, but we always independently assess newsworthiness and factual accuracy before publishing. 9th post: On sourcing, we work to give readers context, including in this case the initial source’s online alias, as a way to learn more about the person, who was effectively an intermediary. The ultimate source was Columbia admissions data and Mr. Mamdani, who confirmed our reporting. 10th post: We heard from readers who wanted more detail about this initial source. That’s fair feedback. We printed his online alias so readers could learn more about the person. The purpose of this story was to help illuminate the thinking and background of a major mayoral candidate.
July 5, 2025 at 3:26 AM
darthputinkgb.bsky.social
Surely Wikileaks will release the Epstein files....
July 17, 2025 at 7:56 PM
darthputinkgb.bsky.social
Who is surprised Wikileaks didn't leak this?
wartranslated.bsky.social WarTranslated (Dmitri) @wartranslated.bsky.social · Mar 31
Recordings of conversations between the Hungarian Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Russian Foreign Minister have appeared online.
March 31, 2026 at 9:40 AM
chrisjustice01.bsky.social
Nigel Farage, Andrew Tate, Wikileaks/Stone, Russian puppet
September 3, 2025 at 4:49 PM
dashannestokes.com
Can we get some Wikileaks or Anonymous to release the full and unredacted Epstein files? Or better yet, anyone credible with a shred of decency?
January 13, 2026 at 7:58 PM
dashannestokes.com
Can we get some Wikileaks or Anonymous to release the full and unredacted Epstein files? Or better yet, anyone credible with a shred of decency?
March 16, 2026 at 6:27 PM
dashannestokes.com
Can we get some Wikileaks or Anonymous to release the Epstein files? Or better yet, anyone credible with a shred of decency?
November 26, 2025 at 3:57 PM
crimew.gay
no thanks
julian assange and wikileaks posting about how Assange is "back"
September 17, 2026 at 2:08 PM
mattmurph24.bsky.social
Where's WikiLeaks on the Epstein files?
December 1, 2025 at 2:38 PM
sundaedivine.lol
Who needs Wikileaks when you have Pete Hegseth?
Hegseth reveals more classified information to his wife
April 21, 2025 at 9:09 AM
treadres.bsky.social
Wikileaks got a competitor.
March 31, 2025 at 12:18 AM
merovingians.bsky.social
funhouse mirror wikileaks
rincewind.run Micah @rincewind.run · Dec 20
I just don’t think this is going away

people are going to play amateur sleuth with the redactions, people are going to invent brand new conspiracy theories, people are going to rightfully complain that they aren’t releasing everything

there’s no out here
acyn.bsky.social Acyn @acyn.bsky.social · Dec 19
Garcia: In our initial estimation—It could be that we're only getting about 10% of what the DOJ has. And of that 10%, 5% of that has already been released. And the other 5% is highly redacted. So we're getting very little so far
December 20, 2025 at 1:51 AM
kenklippenstein.bsky.social
NYT responds to criticism of its Mamdani story, likening the concerns about their source to “Wikileaks or Edward Snowden” (lol)
July 4, 2025 at 10:39 PM
marujatorres.bsky.social
Qué bien nos vendría ahora un buen Wikileaks.
September 6, 2026 at 7:08 AM
darthputinkgb.bsky.social
Who is surprised wikileaks didn't leak the call with Witkoff getting his instructions from Kremlin?
November 26, 2025 at 3:15 PM
dashannestokes.com
Can we get some Wikileaks or Anonymous to release the Epstein files? Or better yet, anyone credible with a shred of decency?
November 20, 2025 at 9:51 AM
juanmasantiago.bsky.social
Ahora era cuando necesitábamos WikiLeaks.
September 23, 2026 at 6:14 AM
eastsplaining.bsky.social
In retrospective this is weird that Wikileaks did not reveal the Epstein case. It's almost like Assange was not that uncompromised truth-seeker as he pretended to be.
March 24, 2026 at 11:04 AM
sarahjeong.bsky.social
ok maybe the craziest thing about these epstein emails is how many of them are still emailing like this after october 2016 and the wikileaks dnc emails
November 13, 2025 at 5:10 PM
darthputinkgb.bsky.social
Upset Trump admin accidently shared US secrets with journalist. Correct method is for Russian intelligence to give them to wikileaks.
March 24, 2025 at 7:58 PM
darthputinkgb.bsky.social
Outraged @theguardian.com revealed how Kremlin uses the Max app for surveillance. Correct procedure is for Wikileaks to selectively release edited files showing it's whatbout NSA.
September 19, 2026 at 9:30 AM
jenmercieca.bsky.social
Putin's going to wikileaks Trump with the Epstein files, isn't he?
August 15, 2025 at 4:28 PM
handle.invalid
i find it a little hard to believe none of this epstein stuff went through wikileaks all these years or did it
March 13, 2026 at 8:12 AM